A donation to a school or a school building fund
Depends
A genuine donation to a school approved for section 18A is deductible, but school fees repackaged as a donation are not.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
Public schools and many independent schools can be approved for section 18A because education is a qualifying public benefit activity. The deduction still requires a valid 18A receipt and stays within the percentage of taxable income limit.
Where people go wrong
The big one is quid pro quo. A donation is a payment for which you receive nothing in return. If the amount secures your child a place, reduces your fee account, or buys any benefit for your family, it is not a donation, and a school that issues an 18A receipt for it is issuing an invalid receipt. SARS has taken issue with exactly this arrangement.
Does buying it save you tax?
Where it is a true donation with a valid receipt, yes, you recover your marginal rate. Where it is fees with a bow on it, no, and the risk sits with you rather than with the school.
Authority s18A
governed by Section 18A donation deduction
may unlock Understatement penalty percentages
Personal and family
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
A short course you take yourself to keep your own skills current
Depends
Deductible for a business owner where it maintains the skills of the trade you already carry on, not where it qualifies you for something new.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The distinction that matters is maintaining versus acquiring. A plumber's course on a new pipe system, or the CPD hours your professional body requires you to keep your licence, maintains an existing income earning ability and is generally a revenue expense. A course that qualifies you to enter a new field is closer to capital and is much harder to sustain. If you are a salaried employee rather than a business owner, the answer is different and much worse, see the separate item.
Where people go wrong
A sole proprietor claiming a qualification that opens a new career, or that they will only use in a business they have not started yet. Pre trade study for a business that does not exist yet falls under the pre trade rules, not into this year's deduction.
Does buying it save you tax?
Where it is genuine CPD for the work you already do, yes, claim it, it is a real cost of staying licensed. Do not enrol in something for the deduction, you still pay most of the fee yourself.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
ATM cash withdrawal fee
Depends
An ATM withdrawal fee follows what the cash was for, exactly like the withdrawal itself: business cash is deductible, personal cash is not, and a bank statement cannot tell you which. PLEASE CONFIRM WITH YOUR TAX PRACTITIONER: this item is matched to an existing rule by general principle, not a SARS ruling written for this exact situation, so check it applies before relying on it.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The fee is incidental to the withdrawal, so it takes the same character as the withdrawal it belongs to under s11(a). Cash drawn to pay a casual worker or buy stock at a cash-only supplier is business expenditure and the fee follows it. Cash drawn for personal spending is not, and neither is its fee.
Where people go wrong
A blanket rule claiming every ATM fee, or claiming none, is wrong in both directions. The fee cannot be assessed without knowing what the cash itself was for, which the bank line never states.
Does buying it save you tax?
Individually trivial, R5 to R12 a time, but frequent cash withdrawals compound over a year. Worth tracking only if cash is a genuine part of how the business pays for things.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Lending and finance
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Air conditioner or heater installed in the home office room
Depends
A portable heater or fan is written off as equipment, but a fixed split unit installed into the wall usually becomes part of the building and is treated as capital improvement rather than a quick deduction.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
The facts that decide it are whether the unit is movable or permanently affixed, and whether the room qualifies as a home office at all. A plug-in heater used in a qualifying office is equipment under s11(e), apportioned for private use, and often under the small item threshold. A fixed installation attached to the structure of a private home is more likely to be capital expenditure on the residence, which adds to base cost rather than giving a deduction. A sole proprietor operating from a genuinely separate structure may have a different and better answer.
Where people go wrong
Treating a permanently installed aircon as a repair or as office equipment and deducting it in one year. Installation into the fabric of a private home is the point at which the answer changes.
Does buying it save you tax?
Buy it for comfort. The portable version gives you a small allowance, and the installed version gives you nothing now and only a base cost adjustment much later.
Authority s11(e)
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Wear and tear on own equipment used for work
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Home office
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Airport lounge access or membership
Depends
Arguable as a business travel cost if you travel constantly for work, but it looks like entertainment and the VAT on it is denied.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Where lounge access is used to work between meetings on genuine business trips, an income tax deduction can be argued under the general deduction rule, apportioned for private travel. But the supply is essentially food, drink and hospitality, so input tax on entertainment is denied for VAT. A lounge benefit that comes free with a credit card costs you nothing separately and so gives nothing to claim.
Where people go wrong
Deducting an annual lounge membership in full when most of your flying is personal. Apportion it on the same ratio as your business to private flights, and be able to show that ratio.
Does buying it save you tax?
Weak. It is a comfort purchase that happens to have a business argument. If you fly a handful of times a year, do not claim it.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Entertainment input tax is denied
governed by Client entertainment is deductible for income tax but blocked for VAT
Vehicles and travel
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Alarm system, CCTV and armed response at a let property
Depends
The monthly armed response and monitoring fee on a let property is deductible, but installing the alarm and cameras is capital.
The answer turns on the facts · Landlord
Recurring monitoring, armed response and alarm service contracts on a property that earns rent are ordinary running costs. The installation of an alarm panel, beams and a camera system is the acquisition of an asset or an improvement to the property and is not deductible in the year. Where the equipment is genuinely removable plant used to produce rental income, a wear and tear claim may be arguable and is worth asking about.
Where people go wrong
Signing a bundled contract where the installation is amortised into the monthly fee and then deducting the full monthly amount. Ask the provider to show the equipment portion separately, because the finance and equipment component is not the same as the monitoring service.
Does buying it save you tax?
The monthly fee is a real recurring deduction most landlords do claim correctly. The hardware is not, and no security system is worth buying for the tax.
Authority s11(a) read with s11(e)
governed by Rental running expenses are deductible
may unlock Wear and tear on business assets
Property
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Alarm system, cameras and electric fencing installed at business premises
Depends
The installed security equipment is written off over time under wear and tear, but burglar bars and security gates fixed to a building you own may be treated as part of the building instead.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Cameras, alarm panels, beams and electric fence energisers are movable equipment and normally attract s11(e) wear and tear over the accepted period. Burglar bars, security gates and walls fixed into the structure are more likely to be capital improvements to the property, which for an owner sit in base cost rather than in a deduction. A VAT vendor claims the input tax on the installation invoice for business premises in the normal way.
Where people go wrong
Claiming a full immediate deduction for a whole security installation because 'it was for security'. Motive does not decide the answer, the nature of the spend does. The bigger trap is claiming a home security system through a home based business: the home office rules make almost none of that claimable.
Does buying it save you tax?
Necessary spend in South Africa, and worth capturing correctly, but the relief comes slowly. Do not expect the tax to fund the system.
Authority s11(e)
excluded by Home office for a sole proprietor
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Repairs to business property
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Office and premises
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Architect, building plans and municipal plan approval fees
Depends
Plan and approval fees take the character of what you are building, so they are almost always capital rather than deductible.
The answer turns on the facts · Landlord
Fees for designing and getting approval for an extension, a cottage or a new structure form part of the cost of that improvement and go to base cost, or into the allowance base if the building qualifies for a building allowance. If the plans were for a project that never went ahead, the cost is generally still capital in nature and simply lost. Plans drawn purely to regularise existing unapproved structures before a sale are a cost of disposal question worth asking about.
Where people go wrong
Deducting professional fees against rental income because they are professional fees rather than bricks. The nature of the underlying project governs, not the type of supplier.
Does buying it save you tax?
No relief now in most cases. Get the plans approved for legal and resale reasons, since unapproved structures cost far more at transfer than any deduction would have saved.
Authority 8th Schedule para 20
governed by Improvements to a let property increase base cost
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Property
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Artist's paint, canvas, framing and studio rent
Depends
Materials and studio rent are deductible against art income, but paint sitting in unsold work is closer to stock than to a spent expense.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Studio rent, electricity for a kiln, framing and delivery to galleries are running costs deductible when incurred. Materials consumed are deductible, but where you hold finished unsold works as stock the cost tied up in them may need to be carried as closing stock rather than deducted immediately. Gallery commission deducted from your sale price is a business expense, and you should declare the gross sale and claim the commission, not just bank the net.
Where people go wrong
Declaring only what the gallery paid out. The gross sale price is your income and the commission is your deduction. Netting them off hides turnover, which matters for provisional tax and for the VAT registration threshold.
Does buying it save you tax?
The studio and framing costs are worth claiming properly. The deeper win for most artists is simply getting registered and declaring correctly, because gallery payment trails are visible.
Authority s11(a), s22
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Provisional tax as a new business owner
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Beautician's treatment bed, wax pot and salon consumables
Depends
The bed and machines are equipment written off over time; wax, strips, lash glue and creams are consumables deducted as you use them.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A treatment bed, facial steamer, laser or IPL machine is equipment recovered through wear and tear over its write-off period, and financing it does not change that: only the interest portion of the instalment is a running deduction, not the whole instalment. Consumables and product used in treatments are deductible when used, with unused stock at year end added back. If you work from a room at home you are into home office territory, which has its own strict requirements about a dedicated, exclusively used space.
Where people go wrong
Deducting the full monthly instalment on a financed IPL machine. Only the finance charge is a running expense; the capital portion is recovered through the wear and tear allowance, and claiming both is a double deduction SARS will pick up.
Does buying it save you tax?
Consumables and the room cost are the real money here. A R150,000 machine bought for the tax break is a bad trade: you recover your marginal rate, spread over years.
Authority s11(a), s11(e), s24J, s23(b)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Interest incurred on business borrowing
may unlock Home office for a sole proprietor
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Bicycle or e-bike used for work
Depends
A bicycle genuinely used in a trade is a business asset written off over time, but cycling to the office is a private commute.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
If the bike is a tool of the trade, for example a courier or a delivery service, it is capital, written off under wear and tear, and its repairs and parts are running costs. If it is used to get to work it is a commute and gives no deduction at all. There is no South African tax incentive for cycling to work, unlike some other countries, so do not assume one exists. A registered vendor can generally claim input tax on a bicycle since it is not a motor car.
Where people go wrong
Believing there is a cycle to work benefit here. There is not. And an employee who buys a bike for work purposes cannot deduct it, employees cannot claim ordinary work costs.
Does buying it save you tax?
Only if you earn income with the bike. Otherwise it is a healthy purchase with no tax consequence.
Authority s11(e)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
Vehicles and travel
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Bond registration and bond initiation fees
Depends
Bond costs are financing costs, not property costs, and they usually get neither a deduction nor a place in base cost.
The answer turns on the facts · Landlord
Registering a bond relates to raising the loan, not to acquiring the property, so it does not naturally sit in base cost the way transfer duty and conveyancing do. Whether any part of the cost of raising finance is deductible against rental or business income depends on the specific provision relied on and is a question a practitioner should answer for your facts. The ongoing bond interest is a separate and much more important item and is deductible against rental income.
Where people go wrong
Two traps. First, adding bond registration to base cost alongside transfer duty because they arrived on the same attorney statement. Second, and far bigger, deducting the whole monthly bond instalment against rental income. Only the interest portion is deductible, never the capital repayment.
Does buying it save you tax?
Do not shop for a bond on the tax treatment of the setup fee. The interest deduction on a let property is where the real money is, and that follows the loan, not the fee.
governed by Transfer duty and bond costs are not deductible now
may unlock Bond interest, not the bond instalment
Property
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Bookshelf or shelving for the home office
Depends
A freestanding bookshelf is office furniture written off under wear and tear, but built in shelving fixed to the wall is an improvement to the house, not a deduction.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
The dividing fact is whether the item is movable furniture or permanently attached to the structure. Freestanding shelving follows the furniture write-off period and may fall under the small item threshold. Built in joinery becomes part of the residence, so it is capital expenditure that may increase the base cost of the property for capital gains purposes instead of producing an income tax deduction.
Where people go wrong
Ordering built in cabinetry for the study and expecting to write it off like a bookshelf from a furniture store. The moment it is fixed to the building the answer changes.
Does buying it save you tax?
The freestanding version gives you a small annual allowance. The built in version gives you a nicer study and a base cost entry you must remember to keep the invoice for.
Authority s11(e)
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Wear and tear on own equipment used for work
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Home office
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Breach of contract settlement paid out
Depends
A settlement paid is deductible if the risk of that claim is an inseparable part of how you trade, and not deductible if it is not.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The test is whether the liability arose from the ordinary operations of your trade and is a risk inseparably connected with carrying it on. A builder settling a defective workmanship claim is close to the line and often deductible. A settlement that is really the price of acquiring or protecting a capital asset, or that arises from something outside your trade, is not. Fines and penalties imposed for unlawful conduct are separately and specifically blocked.
Where people go wrong
Treating a settlement as automatically deductible because you had no choice but to pay it. Compulsion is not the test. The test is the connection to your income producing operations, and a payment to make a capital problem go away stays capital.
Does buying it save you tax?
There is no upside here. Even where deductible you get back only your marginal rate on money you would much rather have kept.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Buying back a squatted domain matching your trademark
Depends
Small annual defensive renewals sit with the ordinary domain renewal item already in the catalogue; a single large purchase to recover a squatted domain is closer to a capital cost of protecting the trademark.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The distinction is size and purpose: routine renewal versus a one-off acquisition of an asset.
Where people go wrong
Treating a large one-off domain buy-back as an ordinary running cost.
Does buying it save you tax?
Worth doing to protect the brand, but budget for it as a capital cost, not an annual expense.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Digital economy, platforms and crypto
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Car on a maintenance plan
Depends
A maintenance plan bundled into the purchase price is not a separate deduction, but it does change the numbers on a company car and on the deemed cost table.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
If the plan is built into the price of the vehicle, it forms part of the cost you write off, not a separate expense. A separately purchased plan on a business vehicle is a running cost, apportioned for private use. For an employee with a company car, a lower monthly percentage of the determined value applies where the car is subject to a maintenance plan, and for a travel allowance the deemed maintenance element of the cost table falls away if the car is on a plan.
Where people go wrong
Claiming actual maintenance costs as well as the deemed maintenance in the cost table, or forgetting to tell your employer the car is on a plan so the fringe benefit is calculated at the higher percentage all year.
Does buying it save you tax?
The plan is bought for peace of mind, not for tax. Its only tax value is a slightly lower fringe benefit if you drive a company car.
Authority Seventh Schedule para 7
governed by Deemed cost table versus actual vehicle costs
governed by Company car fringe benefit reduced for business use
Vehicles and travel
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Cash withdrawal or handling fee, over the counter or at a till point
Depends
Same rule as an ATM fee: the fee takes the character of the cash it was drawn for. PLEASE CONFIRM WITH YOUR TAX PRACTITIONER: this item is matched to an existing rule by general principle, not a SARS ruling written for this exact situation, so check it applies before relying on it.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Covers branch counter withdrawals and till-point cash-back fees, which carry a different bank descriptor from an ATM withdrawal but the identical tax question. See EX-FIN-037.
Where people go wrong
A till cash-back line reads as a purchase at the retailer on a naive matcher. It is a cash withdrawal, not spend at that retailer, and must be split out before any merchant-based categorisation runs.
Does buying it save you tax?
Same as EX-FIN-037.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Lending and finance
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Charging for use of a pool, braai area or garden for a private event
Depends
Hire income for a private venue is taxable, and the cleaning, extra water, electricity and any breakage the event caused are deductible costs against it.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
Once this becomes regular weekend hire rather than a once-off favour for a friend, it starts to look like a trade in its own right and needs its own basic record keeping, separate from a personal household budget.
Where people go wrong
Treating recurring cash hire as informal pocket money is the same trap as items 3 and 4 above.
Does buying it save you tax?
Worth declaring correctly from the first booking; a pattern of undeclared cash hire is exactly what a bank data match flags.
Authority s1
governed by Short term letting is still rental income
may unlock Ring fencing of an assessed loss from a suspect trade
Private, informal and neighbour arrangements
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Cheap office equipment: write it off now or over several years
Depends
Small, cheap items bought for the office can usually be written off in full in the year you buy them, while anything above the small item threshold has to be written off bit by bit over its useful life.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The wear and tear allowance in s11(e) is the general rule for business equipment: you claim a slice each year, not the whole price. There is a long standing exception for small items: assets costing less than a set rand amount per item may be written off in full in the year of acquisition. The threshold is a specific rand figure per item, not per invoice, and it is set by SARS practice rather than something you choose. This is why a plug adaptor and a fridge get different answers even though both plug into the same wall.
Where people go wrong
People buy ten chairs on one invoice, see a big total, and capitalise the lot. The test is the cost of each separate item, not the invoice total. The reverse trap is just as common: someone expenses an expensive fridge in full because it is 'just a kitchen appliance' and SARS spreads it over years on audit, moving the deduction into later years and creating an understatement in the year claimed.
Does buying it save you tax?
The timing is worth getting right but do not overrate it. Whether you claim it all now or over five years, you eventually deduct the same total, and you only ever get back your marginal rate on it. Never buy equipment you do not need in order to trigger a write off.
Authority s11(e)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
may unlock Recoupment when an asset is sold
Office and premises
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Chef's knife roll, whites and personally owned kitchen tools
Depends
A private chef or caterer can claim knives, whites and tools; a chef employed in a restaurant kitchen generally cannot claim the same items.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Trading for own account as a private chef, caterer or pop-up operator makes knives, whites, thermometers, transport containers and ingredient purchases deductible, with knives usually below the small item write-off threshold. Ingredients bought for a specific event are deductible when the event happens, and food still in the fridge at year end is stock. A chef on a restaurant's payroll is a salaried employee and cannot deduct the knife roll he was required to buy, although wear and tear on equipment he owns and uses in his duties may be worth investigating.
Where people go wrong
Employed chefs replacing a stolen knife roll and expecting relief. There is none through the tax system for an employee. The claim to make is on the restaurant or on insurance, not on the ITR12.
Does buying it save you tax?
For a self employed chef, ingredients and transport dwarf the knives and are the claim worth getting right. For an employed chef there is little here.
Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Wear and tear on own equipment used for work
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Coffee machine and coffee pods for the office
Depends
The machine is equipment, the pods are consumables, and the two are treated differently: the machine may have to be written off over time if it is expensive, while the coffee itself is a running cost.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A cheap pod machine falls under the small item write off and comes off in full. A commercial bean to cup machine will usually exceed the small item threshold and is written off under s11(e) over its useful life. The pods, beans, milk and sugar are consumed as you go and are deducted as spent. The VAT position is where it gets uncomfortable: refreshments supplied to staff or clients fall inside the VAT definition of entertainment, so input tax on the coffee itself is normally denied even though the income tax deduction stands.
Where people go wrong
Claiming VAT input tax on the monthly coffee order because the income tax deduction was allowed. Income tax and VAT genuinely diverge here. See the staff refreshments and client entertainment items before you file a VAT201.
Does buying it save you tax?
Fine to claim, not a tax strategy. Buy the machine because your staff need coffee, not because it is deductible. You get back your marginal rate, not the machine.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Entertainment input tax is denied
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Client entertainment is deductible for income tax but blocked for VAT
Office and premises
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Company car provided to an employee
Depends
A company car is a taxable fringe benefit each month, and you reduce it on assessment by proving business kilometres with a logbook.
The answer turns on the facts · Salaried employee
A monthly percentage of the determined value of the vehicle is included in your remuneration, with a lower percentage where the car is subject to a maintenance plan. PAYE is withheld on a portion of that benefit. On assessment the benefit is reduced in the ratio of business kilometres to total kilometres, and further reduced where you personally bore the cost of licence, insurance, maintenance or fuel for private travel. All of it comes off the logbook.
Where people go wrong
Accepting the fringe benefit all year and keeping no logbook, in which case there is no reduction at all and you are taxed on the full benefit. People also forget that they can reduce it further for fuel they paid for out of their own pocket, but only if they kept the slips.
Does buying it save you tax?
A company car with heavy business use and a good logbook can work out well. A company car used mainly privately is an expensive way to be paid, and it is often better to take the cash and buy your own vehicle.
Authority Seventh Schedule para 7
governed by Deemed cost table versus actual vehicle costs
governed by Company car fringe benefit reduced for business use
Vehicles and travel
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Complete new roof on a property you rent out
Depends
Replacing a whole roof usually reads as an improvement, especially if the new roof is better than the old one, so the deduction is far from automatic.
The answer turns on the facts · Landlord
Repairing part of a roof restores the property. Replacing the entire roof renews a substantial whole and SARS often treats it as capital. Changing the character or quality of the roof, for example thatch to tile, or adding insulation and new trusses that were not there, pushes it firmly into improvement. Where a like for like replacement was forced by damage and the property is simply back to its former condition, a repair argument exists but you must be able to evidence it.
Where people go wrong
Assuming that because the roof leaked, the whole replacement is a repair. The leak proves the need, not the character of the spend. If you are replacing everything, expect to defend it, and get an assessor or contractor report describing the old roof's condition and confirming like for like.
Does buying it save you tax?
This is a large number and the tax answer moves a lot of money, so it is worth paying a practitioner to look at the quote before the work starts, not after.
Authority s11(d)
governed by Repairs are deductible, improvements are not
may unlock Improvements to a let property increase base cost
Property
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Content creator's ring light, studio setup and platform subscription fees
Depends
If content is a real income earning trade, lighting, microphones and camera gear are equipment written off over time, while software and platform fees are deducted in full.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Cameras, microphones, lighting and capture cards are equipment on wear and tear, with many individual items falling under the small item write-off threshold. Editing subscriptions, hosting, platform fees and music licensing are running costs. The prior question is whether you are carrying on a trade: consistent income from brand deals, ad revenue or subscriptions supports it, while an aspirational channel with no revenue does not, and losses from an activity that is not a trade cannot be set off against your salary. Products given to you free by brands are usually income at their value, not free stuff.
Where people go wrong
Forgetting that gifted product and free trips from brand partnerships are taxable receipts. Creators claim the ring light as a deduction and never declare the R30,000 of gifted product that came with the deal. SARS treats the value received for services rendered as income.
Does buying it save you tax?
Once the channel earns real money, yes, and the equipment claim is genuine. Before that, buying gear to 'write it off' against a salary usually fails both the trade test and the ring fencing rules.
Authority s11(a), s11(e), s20A
excluded by Ring fencing of an assessed loss from a suspect trade
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Costs of a data breach or ransomware attack
Depends
Cleaning up after a breach is generally deductible, but any fine or penalty imposed on you is not, and a ransom payment is legally fraught.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Forensic investigation, system rebuild, legal advice, notification costs and cyber insurance premiums are expenditure incurred in carrying on the trade and are generally deductible. A penalty imposed by the Information Regulator or any other administrative fine is expressly not deductible. A ransom paid to a criminal is a separate problem: quite apart from deductibility, it may be unlawful, and payments that are unlawful are denied. Any insurance recovery you receive is brought into income against the costs.
Where people go wrong
Assuming the whole incident cost is one deductible number. Split it: remediation on one side, fines and penalties on the other, and do not net the insurance payout out of sight.
Does buying it save you tax?
Nothing about this is worth it. The deduction returns your marginal rate on money you never wanted to spend. The lesson is that prevention and cyber insurance are cheap by comparison.
Authority s23(o)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Technology
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Courier or delivery driver's motorbike, delivery bag and phone data
Depends
Working as an independent delivery driver, fuel, data, maintenance and the bag are deductible; the bike itself is written off over time.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Gig platform drivers are usually contracting for own account rather than employed, which means fuel, maintenance, tyres, helmet, thermal bag, phone data and platform commission are deductible against delivery income. The motorbike or scooter is an asset on wear and tear. A logbook or the platform's own trip records are essential to show the business portion where the same bike is also used privately. Traffic fines are not deductible.
Where people go wrong
No records. Platform earnings are paid into a bank account and are traceable, but cash fuel purchases with no slips are not. Drivers routinely end up taxed on gross platform earnings because they cannot prove a single expense. Download the platform's trip statements monthly and keep the fuel slips.
Does buying it save you tax?
Very much so, because gross platform earnings badly overstate real profit. Getting the expenses documented is the difference between a manageable assessment and an unpayable one.
Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(o)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Record retention obligation
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Credit life insurance on a bond or loan
Depends
Credit life on your own home is a private cost with no deduction, but on a bond over a rental property it is arguably a cost of the rental trade.
The answer turns on the facts · Landlord
On a primary residence there is no trade and no deduction. Where the bond is over a property you let, and the credit life cover is a requirement of the loan producing the rental income, there is a reasonable argument that the premium is deductible along with the bond interest. Take advice, and be clear that the bond capital repayment is never deductible in any case.
Where people go wrong
Bundling the whole bond instalment into rental expenses. Only the interest portion is deductible, never the capital. The insurance premium is a separate line and must be argued separately. Get the annual bond statement that splits interest from capital.
Does buying it save you tax?
Marginal either way. The bigger money is in checking that the credit life premium on the bond is competitive, because banks often sell it at well above market and you are usually entitled to substitute your own policy.
Authority s11(a)
governed by Rental running expenses are deductible
governed by Bond interest, not the bond instalment
Insurance
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Crypto exchange and network transaction fees
Depends
Deductible against trading income if the crypto is held as part of a trade; on a purely personal holding the fees instead adjust base cost for capital gains, mirroring the brokerage item already in the catalogue.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
The revenue-versus-capital question has to be answered first, using the same badges-of-trade analysis SARS applies to any asset.
Where people go wrong
Assuming all crypto fees are automatically deductible regardless of whether the holding is a trade.
Does buying it save you tax?
Worth tracking every fee regardless of classification, since it affects either the deduction or the base cost.
Authority s1
governed by Crypto is taxed, and the basis depends on behaviour
may unlock Swapping one crypto for another is a disposal
Digital economy, platforms and crypto
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Curtains or blinds for the home office window
Depends
Blinds for a qualifying office room may be claimable as low value equipment or as part of fitting out the office, but on a private home the domestic character of the spend usually wins.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
The facts that decide it are whether the room passes the s23(b) exclusivity test, whether the item is movable or fitted, and how private the character of the spend is. Movable curtains in a genuinely exclusive office used to reduce screen glare have an argument under wear and tear, most likely below the small item threshold. Fitted shutters attached to the building are an improvement to the residence. A salaried employee faces the additional s23(m) filter, though wear and tear does survive it.
Where people go wrong
Redecorating the study to a domestic standard and calling it fitting out an office. If the same items would be there in any home, expect SARS to treat the spend as private.
Does buying it save you tax?
Not worth much either way. The amounts are small and the argument is not strong enough to be worth flagging your return over.
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Wear and tear on own equipment used for work
Home office
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
DJ's controller, speakers, lighting and music subscriptions
Depends
Decks, speakers and lighting are equipment written off over time, while music pool subscriptions and track purchases used for paid sets are running costs.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A controller, CDJs, a mixer, PA speakers and lighting rigs are equipment recovered through wear and tear, with cheaper individual items potentially falling under the small item write-off threshold. Subscriptions to record pools and streaming services used to source music for paid sets are deductible, apportioned if you also listen to them privately, which most people do. Transport to venues, insurance on the rig and equipment repairs are deductible running costs.
Where people go wrong
Claiming a full Spotify or Apple Music subscription as a business cost when it is also your everyday listening. Apportion it honestly, or use a genuine DJ pool subscription that is clearly work only, and keep the two separate.
Does buying it save you tax?
Real but modest. The rig is a slow deduction and heavy private use cuts it further. Transport and repairs are the reliable claims.
Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(g)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Damages or a settlement received
Depends
What you received is taxed according to what it replaced: lost profits are income, damage to a capital asset or reputation is capital.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
This is the fill the hole principle. If the payment compensates you for income you would otherwise have earned, such as lost trading profits or unpaid fees, it is gross income and fully taxable. If it compensates you for the loss or impairment of a capital asset, it is a capital receipt and goes into the CGT calculation instead, potentially with a rollover if it was an involuntary disposal. Personal injury and defamation awards to an individual are generally treated very differently again.
Where people go wrong
Not declaring it at all because the money came from a court and felt like a windfall. SARS sees the attorney's trust account payment. Declaring it in the wrong box is fixable, not declaring it is an understatement penalty.
Does buying it save you tax?
Not applicable, this is income to be reported rather than something you buy. Get the settlement agreement to state clearly what each portion is for, before you sign it, because that wording drives the tax.
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Involuntary disposal rollover
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Damages paid after losing a court case
Depends
Damages paid are deductible only where the wrong arose out of your ordinary trading operations, never where they are a fine or arise outside the trade.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Damages for a trading mishap, for example a delivery vehicle causing damage while on a business run, are generally closer to deductible. Damages arising from conduct that is not part of the trade, or that relate to a capital asset, are not. Any element that is a fine, penalty or payment for unlawful activity is expressly disallowed regardless of how it is described.
Where people go wrong
Splitting is where people lose. A single court order often mixes damages, interest, costs and a penalty component. Interest and party and party costs may be treated differently to the damages themselves, and the penalty element is dead. Get the order itemised.
Does buying it save you tax?
No. Nothing about paying damages is a tax play. Make sure your public liability cover is adequate instead.
Authority s23(o)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Damp proofing a let property
Depends
Treating damp in an existing wall is usually a deductible repair, but installing a damp proof course that the building never had can be an improvement.
The answer turns on the facts · Landlord
Where you are restoring a failed damp proof layer or repairing water damaged plaster, that is repair. Where an older building had no damp proof course at all and you install one, you have added something new and SARS may treat it as capital. In practice many damp jobs are a mix of replastering, which repairs, and a new injected course, which improves.
Where people go wrong
Damp jobs are almost always invoiced as one number. Ask for the quote to separate the removal and replastering from any new membrane, course or tanking, because that split is the whole tax answer.
Does buying it save you tax?
The repair portion is real relief now. Do the work regardless, because damp destroys the asset and the rental income far faster than tax saves you anything.
Authority s11(d)
governed by Repairs to business property
governed by Repairs are deductible, improvements are not
Property
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Demolishing a structure on a business or rental property
Depends
Demolition costs usually attach to whatever you build next rather than giving you a deduction, and any relief for the value of what you demolished depends on the allowance history of that building.
The answer turns on the facts · Company
Where you demolish to clear the site for a new structure, the cost is part of the capital cost of the new build. Where a structure is demolished and not replaced, whether any loss or scrapping relief is available turns on whether the demolished asset qualified for capital allowances, because relief on scrapping generally only applies to assets that were being written off. Buildings and structures often sit outside that relief, which is an unwelcome surprise.
Where people go wrong
Assuming that because you lost a real asset you must get a tax loss. If no allowance was ever claimed on the structure, there may be no scrapping deduction and the only route is the capital gains calculation on eventual disposal of the property.
Does buying it save you tax?
Do not demolish expecting a write off. Get the allowance history of the structure checked first, because that history is what decides the answer.
governed by Commercial building allowance
governed by Recoupment when an asset is sold
Property
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Dentist's chair, X-ray unit, autoclave and materials
Depends
The chair, X-ray unit and scanner are practice equipment written off over years; materials and dental lab fees are deducted as you use them.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Dental units, imaging equipment and sterilisers are equipment recovered through wear and tear over the applicable write-off period. Composites, impression materials, burs, gloves and single use items are consumables deductible when incurred, with unused stock added back at year end. Laboratory fees for crowns and dentures are deductible when incurred, and where you have billed the patient but not yet paid the lab, match the periods properly.
Where people go wrong
Financing a full surgery fit-out and deducting the whole instalment. Only the interest is a running deduction. The equipment cost comes back through wear and tear, and leasehold improvements to rented rooms are a separate regime again, not an immediate deduction.
Does buying it save you tax?
Yes for practice costs, but a fit-out is a business decision, not a tax play. The allowance arrives in slices and a February purchase does not rescue a provisional tax estimate.
Authority s11(a), s11(e), s24J, s11(g)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Lease premiums and leasehold improvements
governed by Interest incurred on business borrowing
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Device bought on contract versus bought outright
Depends
Bought outright you write the device off over time; taken on a contract you are financing it, so the device part is still an asset and only the interest and service charges are running costs.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Buying a device gives you an asset with a cost, written off under wear and tear from the date it is brought into use. Taking the same device on a 24 or 36 month contract does not turn it into a monthly expense: in substance you have bought it on credit, so the device portion is capitalised and written off, the finance charge is deductible interest, and the airtime and data portion is a running cost. A true rental where the device goes back and never becomes yours is different and is deductible as rent.
Where people go wrong
Deducting the full monthly contract instalment as an expense. Where the contract is a financed purchase, you are deducting the repayment of capital, which is not deductible, and you are probably also claiming wear and tear on the same device. That is a double claim and it is exactly the kind of thing that unravels on audit.
Does buying it save you tax?
Tax should not decide this. Compare the total cost of the contract against the cash price plus a prepaid plan, because contract pricing usually carries a high effective interest rate that no deduction makes up for.
Authority s11(e)
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
may unlock Interest incurred on business borrowing
Technology
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Dog-sitting, pet-sitting or informal animal boarding income
Depends
Fees for looking after someone's pet are taxable income once they are more than an occasional favour, and a portion of food, bedding and vet call-outs directly tied to the boarded animal is deductible against it.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
Only costs for the boarded animal count. Costs for the sitter's own pets are private expenditure and cannot be blended into the claim.
Where people go wrong
Mixing your own pet's costs into the claim is the fastest way this gets disallowed entirely.
Does buying it save you tax?
Usually small money; the record keeping only pays for itself once it is a repeat arrangement, not a one-off.
Authority s1
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Ring fencing of an assessed loss from a suspect trade
Private, informal and neighbour arrangements
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Domain name registration and renewal
Depends
Annual domain renewals are a small deductible running cost, but paying a large premium to buy an existing domain from someone is capital.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A normal registration or renewal of a domain, together with hosting, is a recurring operating cost and comes off in the year. Buying a valuable existing domain from a third party for a substantial sum is acquiring an asset with lasting value, which is capital and goes to base cost rather than being deducted. The size of the payment and whether it is recurring are the practical indicators.
Where people go wrong
Letting the renewal lapse is the real world trap. Losing a domain someone else immediately registers can cost far more to recover than any tax at stake. Set the domain to auto renew and keep the registrar contact email current.
Does buying it save you tax?
Renewals are small and deductible. A premium domain purchase should be justified commercially, because there is no annual write off waiting for you.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Domain name registration or renewal
Depends
The annual renewal is a small deductible running cost, but buying an existing premium domain from someone is capital.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A yearly registration or renewal fee is revenue expenditure deductible in the year. Paying a significant amount to acquire an existing domain from a third party is acquiring an enduring asset and is capital, so it is not deductible in the year and instead forms part of base cost or possibly qualifies for an allowance if it is intellectual property.
Where people go wrong
A large once-off payment for a valuable domain claimed as if it were a renewal. The amount and the nature of the transaction give it away.
Does buying it save you tax?
Renewals are trivial and deductible. A premium domain purchase should be judged as an investment, not a deduction.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Technology
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Domestic worker or cleaner who also cleans the home office
Depends
A domestic worker is a private household expense, and only a genuinely business specific portion of cleaning could ever be claimed, which for most people is nothing.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
The facts that matter are whether there is an identifiable business cleaning function, whether it is separately contracted and paid for, and whether you can evidence it. A sole proprietor who pays a cleaner specifically to service a customer facing office space has an argument for that portion. A salaried employee has almost none, because s23(m) leaves only premises expenditure and equipment allowances open. Remember the domestic worker still has UIF and, above the earnings threshold, PAYE and compensation fund obligations regardless of any deduction.
Where people go wrong
Slicing the domestic worker's wage by the office floor area percentage. That is not a recognised approach and it converts a private household cost into a claim that will not survive verification.
Does buying it save you tax?
No for almost everyone. Focus on getting the household employment registrations right, which is a real legal obligation, instead of chasing a deduction that is not there.
Authority s23(b)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by Home office for a sole proprietor
Home office
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Door locks, keys and access control at the office
Depends
Replacing a lock, calling a locksmith or cutting keys is a deductible repair, while installing an access control system is equipment written off over time.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Restoring what was there, a broken lock replaced with a similar lock, is a repair under s11(d) and deducted. Cutting spare keys and emergency locksmith call outs are running costs. Installing a biometric reader, card access system or an electric gate motor where none existed creates a new asset, so it falls into s11(e) wear and tear or, if the amount per item is small enough, the small item write off.
Where people go wrong
Calling an upgrade a repair. Swapping a normal lock for a full electronic access control system is not a repair, even though the old lock was broken and the invoice says 'replace lock'. Describe what was actually installed.
Does buying it save you tax?
Small either way. Security spend pays for itself in things other than tax.
Authority s11(d)
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Repairs to business property
Office and premises
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Doubtful debts allowance on overdue debtors
Depends
You can claim an allowance for debts that look doubtful but are not yet written off, calculated on a prescribed basis rather than on your own estimate.
The answer turns on the facts · Company
The doubtful debt allowance is based on how long a debt has been outstanding, using percentages set in the legislation, and the basis differs depending on whether the taxpayer applies IFRS 9 for financial reporting. Whatever allowance you claim in one year is added back to income in the following year and a fresh allowance is calculated, so it is a timing benefit rather than a permanent one. Your own accounting provision is not automatically the tax number.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the accounting provision straight off the trial balance. The tax allowance is a formula driven number tied to ageing, and it is not the same as the provision your accountant raised. A second trap is forgetting the add back in the following year, which understates that year's income.
Does buying it save you tax?
It is a cash flow benefit only. The allowance reverses next year, so it defers tax rather than saving it. The real saving only arrives when the debt is finally written off as bad.
Authority s11(j)
governed by Bad and doubtful debts
Lending and finance
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Drought and disaster losses
Depends
Losses from drought, fire or flood are recognised through the normal farming account, and there are specific First Schedule reliefs that only apply if you use them correctly.
The answer turns on the facts · Farmer
Stock that dies is simply not there at year end, which reduces closing stock and therefore taxable income, provided you record it. Assets destroyed may trigger a recoupment or a scrapping adjustment, and insurance or disaster grants received are income. Separately, the First Schedule contains relief aimed at drought and disaster situations, including deferral where livestock is sold off because of drought.
Where people go wrong
Not documenting the losses. Dead animals with no records, no photographs, no vet or extension officer confirmation and no dates are simply an unexplained drop in stock numbers, which is the hardest thing to defend on audit.
Does buying it save you tax?
There is nothing to buy. What matters is claiming what the disaster actually did to you, which requires records made at the time, not reconstructed later.
Authority First Schedule
governed by Disaster and forced sale relief
may unlock Recoupment when an asset is sold
Farming
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Early settlement penalty on paying off a loan
Depends
If the interest on the loan was deductible, the settlement penalty usually follows it, but a penalty on a private loan gives you nothing.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A settlement or breakage charge is a cost of the borrowing arrangement, so it tends to take the same character as the interest it replaces. Where the loan funded a trade and the interest was deductible, there is a good argument for deducting the penalty in the year it is incurred. Where the loan funded a private house or a personal purchase, there is no deduction. Note that this is a contractual charge, not a fine imposed by law, so the rule denying deductions for fines and penalties does not apply to it.
Where people go wrong
Confusing a commercial settlement penalty with a statutory fine and writing it off as automatically non deductible, or the reverse, deducting a penalty on a private bond because it appeared on a bank statement alongside deductible items.
Does buying it save you tax?
Settling early usually saves more in interest than the penalty costs, and the tax treatment is a second order question. Do the interest maths first.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by Interest incurred on business borrowing
Lending and finance
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Electric fencing installed at a let property
Depends
The first electric fence is an improvement you cannot deduct, but servicing or repairing an existing one is a deductible running cost.
The answer turns on the facts · Landlord
Installing electric fencing where there was none adds a new feature and is capital, so it goes to base cost. Once it exists, the annual service, replacing a blown energiser, restringing broken wires and the electric fence certificate of compliance are deductible against rental income. If the fence and energiser are genuinely removable plant rather than part of the structure, a wear and tear claim may be arguable, and that is a fact question worth asking a practitioner about.
Where people go wrong
Treating the installation and the first year service on one invoice as a single deductible security cost. Split them. The other trap is forgetting that the certificate of compliance fee, unlike the installation, is deductible for a let property.
Does buying it save you tax?
The recurring costs give a real annual deduction. The installation does not. Install it to protect the property and keep it lettable.
Authority s11(a) read with s11(d)
governed by Rental running expenses are deductible
governed by Repairs are deductible, improvements are not
Property
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Electrician's test equipment, insulation tester and wireman's registration
Depends
Running your own electrical business, test gear and your registration renewal are claimable business costs, but the test gear usually comes off over several years, not all at once.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Annual registration as an installation or master installation electrician, and the body's renewal fee, are ordinary costs of carrying on the trade and are deductible in the year paid. Test instruments are equipment: below the small item write-off threshold they can be written off immediately, above it they go on wear and tear over the applicable period. The original qualification and trade test that got you registered in the first place is a different animal: initial qualification costs are usually treated as capital or private in nature, while a renewal or CPD refresher is a running cost.
Where people go wrong
Salaried electricians on a firm's payroll routinely claim their own tool purchases and their registration renewal on the ITR12. Those claims are disallowed, and the same person is often unaware that wear and tear on equipment they own and actually use for work is the one thing that may be claimable.
Does buying it save you tax?
Modest but real. A calibration and registration renewal you are legally required to pay anyway is free money to claim. Buying a new test set purely for the deduction is not, since you recover only your marginal rate.
Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
may unlock Wear and tear on own equipment used for work
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Ergonomic assessment or equipment for a staff member's home office
Depends
Deductible for the employer if it is a genuine work health and safety cost, not simply home furniture provided as a perk.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Where the employer retains ownership of the equipment, it is a business asset written off under wear and tear; where it becomes the employee's property, it may instead be a taxable fringe benefit.
Where people go wrong
Treating a general home-comfort upgrade as a work health and safety cost when it is really a perk.
Does buying it save you tax?
Worth doing for genuine remote workers, provided ownership and the fringe benefit position are thought through first.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Wear and tear on business assets
may unlock Employer provided accommodation
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Estate agent's PPRE qualification, Fidelity Fund certificate and marketing costs
Depends
A commission earning estate agent can deduct real marketing and running costs, which is a genuine exception to the rule that employees cannot deduct work expenses.
The answer turns on the facts · Salaried employee
Where more than the required proportion of your remuneration is commission based on sales, the usual s23(m) block does not apply in the same way and you may deduct expenditure actually incurred in producing that commission: portal listing fees, boards, show day catering, printing, cellphone and business kilometres on a logbook. Annual Fidelity Fund certificate and PPRA fees are running costs of being allowed to trade. The PPRE or professional designation examination that qualifies you in the first place is closer to acquiring a qualification and is a weaker claim than the annual renewal.
Where people go wrong
Assuming commission earner status applies automatically. It depends on the proportion of your remuneration that is commission, and your IRP5 codes must actually reflect it. Agents on a basic salary plus a small commission usually do not qualify, and a full expense claim on that IRP5 will be reversed.
Does buying it save you tax?
For a genuine commission-only agent this is one of the strongest employee-side claims in the whole tax system, and marketing spend is real money. Check the commission proportion first, before you build a claim on it.
Authority s11(a), s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by Commission earner business expenses
may unlock Travel allowance deduction against business kilometres
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Financial adviser's FSCA levies, RE exams and CPD
Depends
An independent adviser with their own FSP licence deducts the levies, compliance and CPD in full; a tied agent on a payslip generally cannot.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
For a licensed FSP trading for own account, FSCA levies, external compliance officer fees, professional indemnity cover, CPD and licence renewal are ordinary running costs deductible in the year. The RE1 and RE5 regulatory examinations, and the initial qualification needed to get licensed, are entry requirements and are closer to acquiring a qualification, so they are a materially weaker claim than the annual levies. An adviser employed by an insurer as a tied agent is caught by s23(m) unless they meet the commission earner test.
Where people go wrong
Treating the RE5 exam fee like the annual levy. One is the price of entry into the trade and one is the cost of continuing a trade you already carry on. SARS treats those differently and lumping them together weakens the whole claim.
Does buying it save you tax?
For an independent FSP the recurring compliance burden is large and fully deductible, so claim it properly. It is a cost of doing business, not a tax play.
Authority s11(a), s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Commission earner business expenses
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Fire extinguishers, fire compliance certificate and servicing
Depends
Annual servicing, refills and the fire compliance inspection are deductible running costs, while a substantial installed fire system is equipment written off over time.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Servicing, pressure testing, refills and the municipal or private fire compliance inspection are recurring and deducted as incurred. A portable extinguisher is usually cheap enough for the small item write off. A hose reel installation, sprinkler system or detection system installed into the building is a different scale and can be either wear and tear equipment or, if it becomes part of the structure, part of the building's cost with its own capital treatment.
Where people go wrong
Treating a full detection or sprinkler installation as a running cost because it appeared on the same invoice as the annual service. Split the invoice between the recurring service and the installed asset.
Does buying it save you tax?
You have to do this regardless. Claim the servicing every year, it is the part people forget.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
may unlock Commercial building allowance
Office and premises
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Forced sale of livestock because of drought
Depends
If drought forces you to sell livestock you did not plan to sell, the First Schedule allows the proceeds to be spread or deferred rather than taxed all in one brutal year.
The answer turns on the facts · Farmer
The relief is aimed at a farmer who destocks because of drought, stock disease or similar conditions and then restocks later. In broad terms the proceeds can be held over and brought into income over subsequent years, or set against the cost of replacement stock, subject to conditions including time limits and, in some cases, the area being formally declared. The mechanics and the election requirements are specific, so this is one to get applied properly rather than assumed.
Where people go wrong
Selling the herd, spending the money, and only discovering at assessment that the entire proceeds landed in one year at the top marginal rate. The relief usually requires an election and often has a deadline. Ask before you sell, not at tax time.
Does buying it save you tax?
This is one of the genuinely valuable farming provisions, and it is regularly missed. If you destocked in a drought year, raise it with your practitioner specifically by name.
Authority First Schedule
governed by Disaster and forced sale relief
may unlock Rating formula for fluctuating farming income
Farming
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Foreign exchange loss on a payment to an overseas supplier
Depends
Exchange differences on business debts are generally brought to account for tax, but the rules differ sharply between companies and individuals.
The answer turns on the facts · Company
For a company, exchange gains and losses on foreign currency debts and forward contracts are usually included or deducted as they arise, whether or not the amount has been settled. For an individual or a trust the rules are narrower and often only apply where the item is held in the course of trade, which means a private foreign payment may produce no deduction at all. The distinction between a realised loss on settlement and an unrealised year end translation difference matters and is not intuitive.
Where people go wrong
An individual assuming a company style translation loss can be claimed on a personal foreign transaction. The other common error is converting at the year end rate when the correct rate for that item is the spot rate on the transaction date or an approved average rate.
Does buying it save you tax?
This is not a planning item, it is a reporting obligation. If you deal in foreign currency at any scale, the cost of getting the conversion basis right in your accounting system is far lower than fixing it under audit.
Authority s24I
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Currency conversion basis
Lending and finance
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Game bought or held on a game farm
Depends
Game farming can be farming for tax purposes, but game is not automatically livestock and the treatment of purchases and year end game numbers needs to be established for your specific operation.
The answer turns on the facts · Farmer
Whether an operation is farming, and whether particular game animals are trading stock with a value at year end, has been the subject of specific SARS rulings and practice rather than a simple statutory list. High value breeding game bought at auction is a particular area where the deduction has been challenged. Hunting and lodge income sitting alongside game breeding may not be farming income at all.
Where people go wrong
Assuming an expensive game purchase is deductible like cattle. Several game breeding structures sold on that assumption did not survive scrutiny. Also, mixing lodge and hunting income into farming income distorts the farming caps and the rating formula.
Does buying it save you tax?
Do not enter game breeding for the tax treatment. Establish the position in writing before you buy, ideally with a ruling or clear professional opinion.
governed by Livestock and produce on hand at standard values
Farming
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Garden service and landscaping at a let property
Depends
A monthly gardener at a property you let is deductible, while landscaping that transforms the garden is a capital improvement.
The answer turns on the facts · Landlord
Recurring maintenance such as mowing, hedge trimming and garden refuse removal at a let property is a running cost of earning rent. Building retaining walls, laying a new irrigation system, terracing, or installing instant lawn where there was none creates something new and is capital. Replacing dead plants in an existing bed is maintenance.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the gardener at your own home because the same person also cuts the grass at the rental. Only the hours at the income producing property count, and you need an invoice that says which property.
Does buying it save you tax?
The recurring service is a real, if small, deduction that people forget. The landscaping is not.
Authority s11(a)
governed by Rental running expenses are deductible
governed by Apportionment for part of a property or part of a year
Property
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Gas stove and gas bottles for a business kitchen
Depends
For a restaurant, cafe or caterer the stove is an asset written off over time and the gas refills are a straight deductible running cost; at home neither is deductible.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Gas refills consumed in producing income are ordinary trading stock or overhead, fully deductible in the year. The stove itself is equipment subject to wear and tear, or a full write-off if it falls under the small item threshold. If the same bottles feed your house braai, apportion. A gas stove in a private kitchen gets nothing, and if it is built in it is an improvement adding to base cost rather than a deduction.
Where people go wrong
Home cooks with a small food business claiming the full household gas account. Only the portion actually used in the trade is claimable, and there is no deemed percentage you can just assert.
Does buying it save you tax?
For a food business, yes, gas is a real cost of trading and keeps the kitchen running through load shedding. For a home, no tax angle at all.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
Energy
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Giving lifts for money on an informal, not-Uber basis
Depends
Money received for driving someone becomes taxable income the moment it is more than an occasional petrol contribution among friends, and once it is income, the actual running costs apportioned to those trips become deductible against it.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
Runs on the same logic as any other vehicle-for-income item already in the catalogue: a logbook proving business kilometres is what makes the deduction real, informal or not.
Where people go wrong
Just covering my petrol is the exact phrase that hides an unregistered informal transport trade. The line is regularity and profit, not the words used to describe it.
Does buying it save you tax?
For genuine occasional cost sharing, no tax event either way. Once it is regular income it needs its own logbook, exactly like any other vehicle claim.
Authority s1
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Ring fencing of an assessed loss from a suspect trade
Private, informal and neighbour arrangements
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Graphic designer's drawing tablet, fonts and stock image licences
Depends
The tablet is equipment written off over time; font and stock image licences bought for client work are deducted in the year.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A Cintiq, iPad Pro or colour-calibrated monitor is equipment recovered through wear and tear, with smaller items possibly under the small item write-off threshold. Per-project font licences, stock photography, mockup packs and plugin subscriptions are ordinary running costs. Where a client reimburses you for a stock licence, that reimbursement is income and the licence is your expense; do not simply leave both off the return.
Where people go wrong
Salaried designers claiming their home setup. If you are on a payslip, the tablet you bought yourself is not deductible as a purchase, and font licences are not equipment so the employee wear and tear route does not reach them either.
Does buying it save you tax?
Solid for freelancers because licences are a clean full-year deduction. Buying a new tablet in February to reduce tax does very little, because you only get a slice.
Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Hairdresser's styling chair, scissors, dryers and colour stock
Depends
Chairs, basins and dryers are salon equipment written off over time, while colour, treatments and retail products are stock deducted as you sell or use them.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Chairs, wash basins, mirrors and hooded dryers are equipment recovered through wear and tear. Scissors, clippers and a straightener will often individually fall under the small item write-off threshold and come off in full. Colour, peroxide, shampoo used in treatments and retail product you resell are trading stock, so closing stock on the shelf at year end is added back and only what actually went through the salon reduces this year's profit. If you rent a chair in someone else's salon you are usually trading for your own account, and the chair rental itself is deductible.
Where people go wrong
Rent-a-chair stylists who assume the salon owner 'handles the tax'. You are trading in your own right, you are likely a provisional taxpayer, and nobody is deducting PAYE for you. Registering late is a bigger problem than any deduction you miss.
Does buying it save you tax?
Product and chair rental are your two biggest real deductions and both are usually under claimed. Equipment reduces tax slowly, so buy it when the salon needs it.
Authority s11(a), s11(e), s22
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Wear and tear on business assets
may unlock Provisional tax as a new business owner
Trades and professions
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Having a contract reviewed by an attorney before signing
Depends
Review fees follow whatever the contract itself is: reviewing a supply agreement is deductible, reviewing the purchase of a business or a property is not.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
This is the clearest place to see the capital versus revenue split. Same attorney, same hourly rate, completely different answer depending on the document on the desk. Reviewing your standard customer terms protects existing income and is deductible. Reviewing the agreement under which you buy premises, buy a business, or acquire shares is a cost of acquiring an asset and goes to base cost.
Where people go wrong
Booking all review fees to one professional fees account so the deductible and the capital work becomes impossible to separate at year end. Narrate each attorney invoice with the matter it relates to when you capture it.
Does buying it save you tax?
The tax outcome should not drive whether you get a contract reviewed. The cost of an unreviewed bad contract dwarfs the deduction.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Heat pump for a geyser or pool
Depends
At home a heat pump gives no deduction and only adds to base cost; in a business there is an ordinary write-off and possibly an energy efficiency allowance if you go through certification.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
For a private residence this is an improvement, treated exactly like the gas geyser: no deduction, add it to base cost. For a business, the unit is plant subject to wear and tear. There is also a separate energy efficiency savings allowance for businesses that achieve measured savings, but it requires a certificate from the designated national body and independent measurement and verification, which is only worth doing at meaningful scale.
Where people go wrong
Assuming the energy efficiency allowance is something you can simply claim on the return because you installed efficient equipment. Without the certificate there is no claim, and the certification process has to be set up before and after the installation, not reconstructed later.
Does buying it save you tax?
At home, no. In a business, the ordinary write-off is worth claiming; the energy efficiency allowance is only worth chasing for large installations where the measured saving justifies the consultant's fee.
Authority s12L
governed by Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
may unlock Wear and tear on business assets
Energy
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.