A short course you take yourself to keep your own skills current
Depends
Deductible for a business owner where it maintains the skills of the trade you already carry on, not where it qualifies you for something new.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The distinction that matters is maintaining versus acquiring. A plumber's course on a new pipe system, or the CPD hours your professional body requires you to keep your licence, maintains an existing income earning ability and is generally a revenue expense. A course that qualifies you to enter a new field is closer to capital and is much harder to sustain. If you are a salaried employee rather than a business owner, the answer is different and much worse, see the separate item.
Where people go wrong
A sole proprietor claiming a qualification that opens a new career, or that they will only use in a business they have not started yet. Pre trade study for a business that does not exist yet falls under the pre trade rules, not into this year's deduction.
Does buying it save you tax?
Where it is genuine CPD for the work you already do, yes, claim it, it is a real cost of staying licensed. Do not enrol in something for the deduction, you still pay most of the fee yourself.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
A suit bought for work
Not deductible
A suit is not deductible, no matter how strictly your job requires you to wear one.
There is no relief for this · Anyone
Ordinary clothing is private expenditure even when you would never wear it outside work and even when your employer or your profession requires it. The test is not whether you like the clothing or whether you would have bought it otherwise, it is whether the item is ordinary clothing capable of everyday wear. Suits, smart dresses, shirts, ties and formal shoes all fail. The line is crossed only where clothing is genuinely distinctive as a uniform or genuinely protective, which is why branded workwear and safety boots do get through.
Where people go wrong
This is the single most widely believed wrong deduction in the country. Advocates and estate agents and sales people claim suits, shoes and dry cleaning every year and it fails. A related trap: a company buying suits for directors does get a deduction for the cost as remuneration, but it then creates a taxable fringe benefit on the director, so nothing is gained and payroll was not adjusted.
Does buying it save you tax?
No relief at all, so there is no tax reason to buy it. If the business is going to clothe people, spend the money on properly branded uniform instead, which is deductible and tax free to the wearer. That is the whole difference.
Authority s23(a)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Bursary for an employee's child or relative
Deductible
Deductible for the employer, and exempt for the employee up to a cap that depends on the employee's remuneration and the level of study.
You can claim this · Company
A bursary granted to a relative of an employee is exempt only if the employee's remuneration is below a prescribed proxy threshold, and only up to a monetary cap that differs for schooling versus higher education. Anything above the cap, or any bursary where the employee earns over the threshold, is a taxable fringe benefit in the employee's hands and must run through payroll. A larger cap applies where the relative has a disability.
Where people go wrong
Again, salary sacrifice. Structuring a scheme where employees give up salary so the company pays their children's school fees is specifically blocked, and SARS has attacked these schemes directly. The other common error is applying the higher education cap to primary or secondary school fees.
Does buying it save you tax?
A strong, well liked benefit for lower paid staff where you stay inside the thresholds, and better value than the same rand paid as salary. Above the thresholds it is just taxable pay with extra paperwork.
Authority s10(1)(q)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Employer bursary exemption
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
COIDA assessment and the Workmen's Compensation return
Deductible
The annual Compensation Fund assessment is a deductible business cost, and filing the Return of Earnings is compulsory for almost every employer.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Every employer with employees must register with the Compensation Fund, submit an annual Return of Earnings, and pay an assessment based on payroll and the risk rating of the industry. That assessment is deductible under the general deduction rule. A letter of good standing, which you need for most commercial and government contracts, only issues once the return is filed and the assessment paid. Domestic workers in private households are now covered too.
Where people go wrong
Skipping the Return of Earnings because there were no injuries. The return is due regardless of claims, and late filing attracts penalties and interest, and blocks the letter of good standing that a customer may already be waiting for. Employers also wrongly assume directors or family members can be left off the return.
Does buying it save you tax?
Compulsory. Deductible, but the point of paying it is that it caps your exposure when someone is hurt at work and it keeps you tender eligible. Do not treat it as optional.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Cleaner or tea lady at business premises
Deductible
Cleaning staff for your business premises are a fully deductible business cost.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
It makes no difference whether you employ the cleaner yourself or pay a cleaning company. If you employ the person directly, all the normal payroll duties apply: PAYE where the threshold is crossed, UIF, COIDA and an IRP5. If you use a contractor, keep the invoice. Where the premises are partly private, for example a room in your home, apportion.
Where people go wrong
Running the household domestic worker through the business books as an office cleaner. If the person's hours are actually spent at your house, the deduction fails and it also creates a fringe benefit question for you as the owner.
Does buying it save you tax?
Ordinary running cost, deductible, no special advantage. It saves your marginal rate on money you would have spent anyway.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Home office for a sole proprietor
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Commission paid to a salesperson
Deductible
Commission paid for sales made is fully deductible, and if the person is on your payroll it is remuneration with PAYE.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The deduction is straightforward. The classification is where it goes wrong: a commission only salesperson is very often still an employee for tax, not an independent contractor, and PAYE applies at the commission earner rate. Commission is variable remuneration, which has its own timing rule for accrual in the employee's hands. Commission paid to a genuinely independent agent running their own business is a normal expense against an invoice.
Where people go wrong
Treating every commission only person as a contractor to avoid payroll. If they work under your control, use your systems and mostly serve you, they are an employee and the unwithheld PAYE becomes your liability. See the independent contractor item.
Does buying it save you tax?
It is a cost that only arises when revenue arrives, which is why it is a sensible way to pay. Deductible, no special tax advantage over salary.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Commission earner business expenses
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Conference, seminar or industry event
Apportioned
Deductible where the conference relates to the trade you already carry on, with any private portion of the trip stripped out.
Claim the business share only · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The delegate fee, flights, accommodation and reasonable meals connected to a genuine business conference deduct. If you extend the trip for a holiday, or take a spouse who has no role in the business, that portion is private and comes out. Keep the programme or agenda, not just the invoice, because the agenda is what proves the business connection. VAT input tax on entertainment elements is generally denied even where the income tax deduction stands.
Where people go wrong
The destination conference. Three days of sessions attached to ten days at the coast, claimed in full. Apportion honestly by days, and never claim a spouse's ticket or flight unless the spouse genuinely works in the business and attended for that reason.
Work out your share
Enter a cost and a percentage. The percentage has to be one you can defend with
something real, floor area for a room, a logbook for a vehicle, an itemised bill
for a phone.
Does buying it save you tax?
Legitimate and deductible where the business link is real, and it saves your marginal rate. It is not a way to write off a holiday, and SARS looks at conference travel precisely because people try.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Entertainment input tax is denied
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Business travel, flights and accommodation
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Degree or qualification paid for an employee (employer bursary)
Deductible
The cost is deductible for you, and it can be tax free in the employee's hands if the bursary conditions are met.
You can claim this · Company
The employer deducts the cost as a staff expense. For the employee, a bona fide bursary or scholarship granted to enable study at a recognised institution is exempt, subject to conditions and monetary caps set in the Act. A key condition is the repayment undertaking: the employee must be obliged to repay if they fail to complete their studies for a reason other than death, ill health or injury. There is a separate, more generous treatment where the employee has a disability.
Where people go wrong
Salary sacrifice. If the employee gives up part of their existing salary in exchange for the bursary, the exemption is specifically denied. Employers restructure packages to convert taxable salary into a tax free bursary and it does not work. The second trap is exceeding the monetary cap and not putting the excess through payroll as a taxable benefit.
Does buying it save you tax?
Genuinely good value where it is a real addition to the package: fully deductible for you and, within the caps, tax free for the employee, which is better than paying the same amount as salary. It only works if it is new money, not converted salary.
Authority s10(1)(q)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Employer bursary exemption
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Domestic worker or nanny at your own home
Not deductible
Wages for a domestic worker at your private home are a private cost and give you no tax deduction.
There is no relief for this · Anyone
This is private and domestic expenditure, which the Act specifically blocks. It does not become deductible because you work from home, and it does not become deductible because you could not work without childcare. The only narrow exception is a genuine, properly apportioned share of cleaning that relates to a qualifying home office area, and even that is only available to taxpayers who can claim a home office at all. You do still have real obligations as a domestic employer: UIF registration and contributions, and COIDA now covers domestic workers.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the full domestic worker wage as a home office expense. Cleaning the whole house is not a home office cost, and claiming it invites SARS to look at the entire home office claim. Separately, people assume a domestic worker is outside UIF and COIDA. They are not.
Does buying it save you tax?
There is no tax saving here at all. Budget for it as a household cost and make sure you are registered for domestic UIF and COIDA, because that is where the real exposure sits.
Authority s23(a)
excluded by Home office for a sole proprietor
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) subscription
Deductible
A deductible staff welfare cost alongside the team-building item already listed in the catalogue.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Ordinary deductible cost of employing people.
Where people go wrong
None specific.
Does buying it save you tax?
Worth it for staff wellbeing, and the deduction is straightforward.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Employer contributions to a staff pension, provident or retirement annuity fund
Deductible
Deductible for the employer, treated as a fringe benefit on the employee, who then deducts it as if they had contributed it themselves.
You can claim this · Company
The employer claims its contributions to an approved fund as a deduction, subject to the limits in the Act. The employee is taxed on the employer contribution as a fringe benefit, and the same amount is then treated as a contribution made by the employee, so it feeds into the individual retirement contribution deduction which is capped by percentage of remuneration or taxable income and an annual rand ceiling. In most cases the two legs largely cancel out, unless the employee is already over the cap.
Where people go wrong
High earners already at the annual cap. The fringe benefit is fully taxed but the corresponding deduction is limited, so the employee ends up taxed on part of a contribution they cannot deduct. Contributions disallowed for this reason are carried forward and also affect the tax on the eventual annuity, so they must be tracked and not forgotten.
Does buying it save you tax?
Yes, this is one of the genuinely strong parts of the system. Retirement funding is one of the few large deductions an individual can actually get, and running it through the employer is efficient. Just check where the employee sits against the annual cap before increasing contributions.
Authority s11(l)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Retirement fund contribution deduction
may unlock Excess retirement contributions carried forward
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Employment tax incentive for young workers (ETI)
Deductible
ETI is not a deduction, it is a reduction of the PAYE you pay over to SARS for hiring qualifying young employees.
You can claim this · Company
For each qualifying employee in a qualifying age band, earning within a prescribed wage range, hired after the qualifying date, the employer reduces the monthly PAYE payment by a calculated amount for a limited number of months. It is claimed on the EMP201, not on the income tax return, and it does not reduce the salary deduction, which stays fully claimable. The employer must be tax compliant and registered for PAYE. Special rules apply in special economic zones and to certain designated industries.
Where people go wrong
Two big ones. First, claiming for employees who fail a condition, most often the minimum wage floor set by the wage regulating measure or the national minimum wage, which SARS has actively audited and reversed with penalties. Second, letting an excess ETI balance simply expire: unclaimed ETI is refundable only through the EMP501 reconciliation process and only within the rules, and employers routinely lose it by not reconciling.
Does buying it save you tax?
Yes. This is real cash, not a deduction, and it is worth more per rand than an expense claim. But the eligibility rules are exact and the penalty regime for over claiming is harsh, so run it off proper payroll software and keep the age, wage and start date evidence.
Authority Employment Tax Incentive Act
governed by Employment tax incentive
governed by Tax compliance status
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Ergonomic assessment or equipment for a staff member's home office
Depends
Deductible for the employer if it is a genuine work health and safety cost, not simply home furniture provided as a perk.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Where the employer retains ownership of the equipment, it is a business asset written off under wear and tear; where it becomes the employee's property, it may instead be a taxable fringe benefit.
Where people go wrong
Treating a general home-comfort upgrade as a work health and safety cost when it is really a perk.
Does buying it save you tax?
Worth doing for genuine remote workers, provided ownership and the fringe benefit position are thought through first.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Wear and tear on business assets
may unlock Employer provided accommodation
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Fees paid to a labour broker
Deductible
Labour broker fees are deductible, but you must withhold PAYE from the broker unless they show you a valid exemption certificate.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A labour broker as defined provides other people to work for a client. The fee is a normal business expense. The compliance point is that payments to a labour broker are remuneration for PAYE purposes unless the broker holds a valid exemption certificate, commonly called an IRP30, and gives you a copy. Get the certificate before you pay, check it covers the current period, and keep it on file with the invoices.
Where people go wrong
Paying the broker gross with no exemption certificate on file. The PAYE you failed to withhold becomes recoverable from you, with penalties, and no invoice fixes that later. Also watch the labour law side: after a set period a temporary employment service worker can be deemed the client's employee.
Does buying it save you tax?
It is a legitimate way to buy labour flexibility. There is no tax advantage over hiring directly, and the certificate admin is real. Price it on the commercial merits.
Authority Fourth Schedule
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Tax compliance status
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Gift to a staff member
Deductible
Deductible for the business, but a gift to an employee is generally a taxable fringe benefit that should go through payroll.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The cost is an ordinary staff expense for the employer. On the employee side, the Seventh Schedule taxes assets given to an employee free or at a reduced price, and vouchers or gift cards are treated as cash equivalents, which makes them squarely taxable. There is a specific exclusion for long service awards subject to conditions and a monetary limit, but that is a separate, narrow rule and does not cover a general Christmas gift.
Where people go wrong
Handing out gift vouchers at year end and never putting them through payroll. Vouchers are effectively cash and are the version SARS finds most easily on an employer audit. A physical, low value item is a softer case than a voucher, but the safe route is to value it and process it.
Does buying it save you tax?
The deduction is real but small, and it is largely offset by the PAYE the employee pays on the benefit. If you want to give something meaningful and tax efficient, look at the long service award exclusion or a bursary rather than a voucher.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Entertainment input tax is denied
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Group life, disability or funeral cover for staff
Deductible
Premiums are deductible for the employer, and the employer paid premium is generally a taxable fringe benefit for the employee.
You can claim this · Company
Group risk cover for employees is a staff cost and deducts. Where the cover sits inside an approved retirement fund, the contribution is treated under the retirement fund rules; where it is a standalone group scheme, the employer paid premium is generally a taxable benefit in the employee's hands. Whether the eventual payout is taxable depends on the type of benefit and how the policy is structured, and the rules changed over time for income protection policies, so do not assume the position from an older policy document.
Where people go wrong
Assuming the payout is tax free because the premiums were taxed, or the reverse. The premium and payout treatment must be looked at together for the specific policy, and income protection in particular was changed so that premiums are no longer deductible by the individual while benefits are taxed as income.
Does buying it save you tax?
Sensible cover to provide, and deductible. Treat the tax as neutral to slightly negative and buy it on the cover, not the tax.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Independent contractor versus employee: which one are they really
Depends
You do not decide this by writing contractor on the invoice, and getting it wrong makes the unpaid PAYE your problem, not theirs.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The payment is deductible either way, so the money at stake is not the deduction, it is employees' tax. The Fourth Schedule and SARS practice look at the substance: who controls how and when the work is done, whose tools and premises are used, whether the person carries their own risk of profit and loss, whether they can send a substitute, and whether they serve other clients. There are also statutory presumptions that treat a person as not independent where they work mainly at your premises under your control or supervision. Separately, where the contractor works through their own company or trust and looks like an employee of yours, that entity can be a personal service provider, which puts you under a duty to withhold PAYE at a high rate on payments to it.
Where people go wrong
The whole trap. If SARS reclassifies the person, it does not chase them, it raises the PAYE you should have withheld against you as the employer, plus a percentage based penalty and interest, going back over open years. A signed contractor agreement is evidence, not a defence, and it loses to the facts every time. The second trap is paying a company or trust and assuming that ends your PAYE duty. It does not, if the personal service provider tests are met.
Does buying it save you tax?
There is no tax saving in calling someone a contractor. You save payroll admin and UIF, and you take on a contingent PAYE liability that can dwarf both. If the person walks, talks and reports like an employee, put them on payroll and sleep.
Authority Fourth Schedule
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Understatement penalty percentages
may unlock Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Job advert on a jobs site or in the paper
Deductible
Advertising a vacancy is a deductible business expense in the year you place the advert.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
This covers job board listings, newspaper classifieds, LinkedIn job slots and printed notices. Keep the invoice and note which role it was for, since it is the kind of small line item that a verification will ask you to explain. Same pre trade caveat as recruitment fees if the business has not started trading.
Where people go wrong
Very little goes wrong here. The only real issue is bundling it into a general advertising figure with no supporting invoices at all.
Does buying it save you tax?
Small, ordinary, deductible. No tax angle worth thinking about.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Laundry and dry cleaning of uniforms
Depends
A business paying a laundry to clean staff uniforms deducts it; an employee washing their own work clothes at home gets nothing.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Where the business contracts a laundry service for uniforms, overalls or restaurant linen, the invoice is a deductible operating cost. Where the clothing being cleaned is ordinary clothing rather than a uniform, the cost follows the clothing and is private. For a salaried employee, personal laundry or dry cleaning is not on the short list of employee deductions, so there is no claim even for a required uniform.
Where people go wrong
Employees claiming dry cleaning of work suits, which fails twice over: the suit itself is private, and employees cannot deduct it in any event. Businesses sometimes also run the owner's personal dry cleaning through the laundry account.
Does buying it save you tax?
For a business with real uniforms or linen, an ordinary deductible cost. For an individual, nothing.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Leave paid out to an employee
Deductible
Deductible for the employer and taxed as ordinary remuneration for the employee, even when it is paid on retrenchment.
You can claim this · Company
Leave actually paid out is a normal wage cost and deducts. For the employee it is remuneration subject to PAYE at their normal rates. An accounting provision for leave that has accrued but has not yet become an unconditional liability is generally not deductible, which is a common difference between the financial statements and the tax computation.
Where people go wrong
Including leave pay in a severance directive so it is taxed on the retirement table. It does not belong there and SARS corrects it on assessment, producing a bill months after the money is spent. The employer side trap is deducting the leave provision rather than actual leave paid.
Does buying it save you tax?
Not a choice, just a cost. The point worth knowing is that a leave payout in the same month as a retrenchment is taxed quite differently from the severance benefit next to it.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Leave paid out on resignation
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Loan or salary advance to a staff member
Not deductible
Lending money to an employee is not an expense at all, and an interest free or cheap loan creates a taxable fringe benefit.
There is no relief for this · Company
A loan is a movement of an asset, not expenditure, so there is nothing to deduct when you make it. If the employee never repays and you write it off, the write off may be deductible or it may be treated as remuneration, depending on the facts. Where you charge no interest or less than the official rate of interest, the shortfall is a fringe benefit taxable on the employee and must be run through payroll monthly. Short salary advances repaid within the same month are usually not treated as loans, but check the terms.
Where people go wrong
Interest free staff loans that sit on the loan account for years with no fringe benefit ever declared. It is a standard employer audit finding. The second trap is deducting the loan as a wage expense when it is paid out.
Does buying it save you tax?
No deduction, and an admin burden if the loan is cheap. If you actually intend to give the employee the money, pay it as a bonus and tax it properly, it is cleaner than a loan you will never collect.
Authority Seventh Schedule
governed by Low interest loan from an employer
may unlock Bad and doubtful debts
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Long service award
Deductible
Deductible for the employer, and partly tax free for the employee if it meets the long service conditions and stays under the limit.
You can claim this · Company
The Seventh Schedule provides a specific exclusion for an award made for long service, subject to a definition of what counts as long service (an initial unbroken period, and then further periods after that) and a monetary limit. The exclusion applies to the asset given, and any value above the limit is a taxable benefit. Cash paid instead of an asset does not get the same treatment.
Where people go wrong
Paying cash. A cash long service bonus is simply remuneration and is fully taxed, which surprises employers who thought the long service rule covered it. The other trap is awarding for a period that does not meet the definition, for example a five year award, and treating it as exempt.
Does buying it save you tax?
Where you were going to recognise long service anyway, structuring it as a qualifying asset award within the limit is genuinely more efficient than the same value in cash. Check the current limit before deciding what to buy.
Authority Seventh Schedule
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Maternity top up paid by the employer
Deductible
Any maternity pay the employer adds on top of the UIF benefit is deductible for the employer and taxable remuneration for the employee.
You can claim this · Company
The UIF maternity benefit itself comes from the fund and is not taxable in the employee's hands, and it is not an employer expense. Where the employer pays a top up so the employee receives a fuller salary, that top up is an ordinary wage cost, deductible, and subject to PAYE and the usual payroll treatment. Statutory maternity leave itself is unpaid under the Basic Conditions of Employment Act unless the contract or policy says otherwise.
Where people go wrong
Treating the employer top up as a non taxable benefit because it relates to maternity. It is salary. The other practical trap is failing to submit the UI-19 and the required documentation, which delays or blocks the employee's UIF claim entirely.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible for the employer, taxed for the employee, no special relief. It is a retention decision, not a tax one.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Medical aid contributions the employer pays for staff
Deductible
Deductible for the employer, taxed as a fringe benefit on the employee, and the employee then gets the medical scheme fees tax credit.
You can claim this · Company
The employer claims the contribution as a staff cost. The Seventh Schedule treats the employer's contribution as a taxable benefit in the employee's hands, which must be shown on the payslip and the IRP5. The employee is then entitled to the medical scheme fees tax credit for themselves and their dependants, which the employer normally applies against PAYE monthly. The net position for the employee is usually much better than paying the contribution from after tax salary themselves.
Where people go wrong
Paying the medical aid and never processing the fringe benefit or the credit through payroll. Both sides get missed together, which understates PAYE and also robs the employee of the credit, and it is picked up on the EMP501 reconciliation. Also watch the IRP5 codes, since an incorrect code stops the credit calculating on assessment.
Does buying it save you tax?
A well used benefit. It is not free of tax, but the tax credit substantially offsets the fringe benefit, and it costs the employee less than funding the same cover privately. Just make sure payroll processes both legs.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Employer paid medical contributions
may unlock Medical scheme fees tax credit
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Occupational health assessments required by law for certain roles
Deductible
A legally required health assessment for staff is a deductible employment cost.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Distinguish from an employee's own out-of-pocket medical costs, which are not deductible for the employer or the employee under the catalogue's existing medical items.
Where people go wrong
None specific.
Does buying it save you tax?
Worth doing for compliance reasons regardless of the tax treatment; the deduction is a straightforward bonus.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Paying a casual worker in cash
Depends
Cash wages are deductible if you can prove the work happened and who you paid, and they still carry PAYE and UIF obligations.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The law does not care that you paid in cash, it cares whether you can show the expense was actually incurred in producing income. That means a wage register with names, ID numbers, dates, hours and a signature per payment. Casual and part time workers are not automatically outside the PAYE and UIF net: the thresholds and rules in the Fourth Schedule and the UIF legislation apply on their own terms, not on whether you call the person casual.
Where people go wrong
No record at all. An undocumented cash wage bill is the single easiest deduction for SARS to disallow on verification, because there is nothing to look at. The second trap is assuming casual means no PAYE and no UIF.
Does buying it save you tax?
It is a real cost, so claim it, but only claim what you can evidence. A wage register you fill in on the day is worth more than the deduction itself if you are ever verified.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Record retention obligation
governed by Understatement penalty percentages
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Paying your spouse a salary from your business
Depends
Deductible if your spouse actually works in the business and is paid a market related rate for that work.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Same test as any family member: real services, market related amount, proper payroll. The salary is taxable in your spouse's hands and needs an IRP5, and PAYE applies once the income crosses the threshold. If you are married in community of property, be aware that trade income from the joint estate is already split for tax in a particular way, so paying a salary on top can double up or muddle the picture. Get the marital regime checked before structuring it.
Where people go wrong
Paying a large salary for two hours of admin a week. SARS will accept a bookkeeper's market rate for bookkeeping work, not a manager's salary. The other trap is forgetting that this makes your spouse an employee, with UIF, a contract and an IRP5.
Does buying it save you tax?
It can be a real saving where you are in a high bracket and your spouse is in a low one, but only for genuine work at a defensible rate. If your spouse does nothing in the business, this is not a plan, it is a risk.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Married in community of property splits income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Professional exam fees and professional body membership
Depends
Deductible if you are self employed and the registration keeps you licensed to trade, effectively nil if you are a salaried employee paying it yourself.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
For a sole proprietor or a company, the annual registration or licence fee that lets the practice operate is a normal cost of producing income and deducts. Exam fees for admission to a profession you are not yet qualified in look more like acquiring a new income earning capacity, which is a weaker claim. For a salaried employee, the closed list in s23(m) is the problem: professional subscriptions paid personally by an employee are generally not deductible. Where the employer pays the subscription for an employee, the employer deducts it and there is a fringe benefit question to check.
Where people go wrong
Employees claiming annual professional subscriptions on the ITR12 because they used to be claimable, or because a colleague said so. Get the employer to pay it directly instead.
Does buying it save you tax?
For the self employed it is unavoidable and deductible, so claim it. For employees the real move is to have the employer carry it as a company cost.
Authority s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Protective clothing, PPE and safety boots
Deductible
Protective equipment the law or the job requires is deductible for the employer and is not a taxable benefit for the worker.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
PPE is required by occupational health and safety legislation and is squarely a business cost. Boots, hard hats, gloves, high visibility vests, goggles, respirators and hearing protection all deduct in the year bought where they are consumables replaced regularly. Larger, longer lived safety equipment can fall into wear and tear instead, and small items below the write off threshold are typically written off in full. Providing PPE is an employer duty under the OHS Act, not something you may charge back to the worker.
Where people go wrong
Deducting the cost of PPE from a worker's wages. That is an OHS Act problem, not a tax one, but it also muddies your deduction. On the tax side, the common error is a self employed person claiming boots and workwear that are actually ordinary clothing with no protective character.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible, legally required, and cheaper than an injury on duty claim and the resulting COIDA experience. Buy the right gear.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Wear and tear on business assets
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Psychometric assessment, background or credit check on a candidate
Deductible
Screening and vetting costs for hiring are deductible business expenses.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Fees to a vetting bureau, a psychometrist or an assessment provider are part of the cost of staffing the business and deduct in the year incurred. The compliance risk here is not tax, it is data protection and labour law: psychometric testing must be scientifically valid and properly applied, and credit and criminal checks need consent and a defensible link to the job.
Where people go wrong
Running credit or criminal checks without the candidate's written consent, or using a psychometric instrument that cannot be justified for the role. That is a POPIA and Employment Equity Act problem, and the SARS deduction is the least of it.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible and cheap relative to a bad hire. Nothing tax driven about it.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Recruitment agency placement fee
Deductible
What you pay a recruiter to fill a position in an existing business is deductible in the year it is incurred.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Recruiting for a running business is an ordinary cost of producing income, even though the benefit of a good hire lasts more than a year. The picture changes if the recruitment is part of setting up a brand new business or a new line of trade before any income exists, because pre trade expenditure is treated separately and is only released against income from that trade once it starts.
Where people go wrong
Recruitment costs incurred before the business begins trading. They are not simply lost, but they do not deduct in the year spent either, they are held over under the pre trade expenditure rules. People claim them in year one and lose the argument.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible, so the effective cost is the fee less your marginal rate. Choose the recruiter on the quality of the shortlist, not the deduction.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Referral fee or spotter's fee paid to someone who does not work for you
Deductible
A referral fee for business actually introduced is deductible, provided it is documented and lawful.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
This is a normal cost of getting income, so it passes the general deduction test. What you need is evidence: who referred what, when, and an invoice or signed acknowledgement of the payment. The recipient must declare it as income. If the arrangement is regular enough it can start to look like remuneration, and in some regulated sectors, for example financial services and medical practice, referral payments are restricted or prohibited by the regulator.
Where people go wrong
Paying it in cash with no paper and no idea of the recipient's details, then finding SARS treats it as an unsubstantiated expense. Worse, a payment that is actually an inducement prohibited by a regulator or by law is specifically not deductible.
Does buying it save you tax?
Fine as a cost of acquisition and deductible, but only pay what the lead is genuinely worth. There is no tax reason to pay a referral fee, only a commercial one.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Registered learnership agreement
Deductible
A registered learnership gives you an extra deduction on top of the wages you already deduct, and a further one when the learner completes.
You can claim this · Company
Section 12H provides an annual allowance for each registered learnership agreement in force, plus a completion allowance when the learner finishes, with a larger amount where the learner has a disability. The agreement must be registered with a SETA and must meet the requirements in the section, and the allowance is apportioned where the agreement runs for part of a year. This is in addition to the ordinary deduction for the learner's salary, not instead of it. The section has been extended by successive amendment acts, so confirm it is still in force for your year of assessment.
Where people go wrong
The paperwork. The allowance depends on a properly registered agreement lodged with the SETA within the required period, and employers who signed the learner up but never completed registration get the salary deduction and nothing else. Also common: claiming the completion allowance in the wrong year, or claiming for an internship or in house training that is not a registered learnership at all.
Does buying it save you tax?
Yes, genuinely. This is one of the few places where the tax system pays you extra for something you were probably going to do anyway, and it stacks with SETA discretionary grants and often with ETI on the same young learner. Worth setting up properly.
Authority s12H
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Learnership allowance
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Retrenchment and severance pay
Deductible
Deductible for the employer, and for the employee a qualifying severance benefit is taxed on the favourable retirement table, not at the marginal rate.
You can claim this · Company
For the business, retrenchment costs are a cost of the trade and deduct when the liability is incurred. For the employee, a severance benefit paid because of retrenchment, redundancy or reaching a qualifying age is taxed on the retirement lump sum table, which includes a tax free portion, and the employer must apply for a tax directive before paying. Critically, the tax free portion is a lifetime amount aggregated with all previous retirement and severance lump sums, so a prior withdrawal can consume it. Not everything in the package qualifies: leave pay, notice pay, pro rata bonus and outstanding salary are ordinary remuneration taxed normally.
Where people go wrong
Assuming the whole package is taxed on the severance table. Payroll frequently lumps leave pay and notice pay into the directive request, or the other way round, and the assessment corrects it later with an unexpected bill. The other trap is a director or connected person whose payment does not meet the qualifying conditions and so is not a severance benefit at all.
Does buying it save you tax?
Nobody plans a retrenchment for tax. What matters is getting the directive right and knowing that the tax free portion may already have been used up by an earlier fund withdrawal, so the net number can be far lower than expected.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Severance benefit taxed on the retirement table
governed by Withdrawal lump sums aggregate across a lifetime
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Salaries and wages paid to staff
Deductible
What you pay your staff to work in your business is fully deductible in the year it is incurred.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The deduction is for the gross cost, not the net amount paid into the bank, so PAYE and UIF withheld from the employee still form part of your deductible wage bill. You must be registered as an employer and run a payroll: EMP201 monthly, EMP501 reconciliation twice a year, and an IRP5 for each employee. The deduction sits in the year the liability was incurred, not necessarily the year it was paid.
Where people go wrong
Paying people without registering for PAYE. The deduction usually still stands if the payments are real and provable, but SARS can raise the PAYE you should have withheld against you personally, plus a percentage penalty and interest. The unpaid PAYE costs far more than the deduction saves.
Does buying it save you tax?
Not a tax play, it is the cost of running a business. It reduces taxable income so you recover your marginal rate, and it creates payroll obligations that cost money and time. Never put someone on the payroll for the deduction.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Record retention obligation
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Salary paid to a family member working in the business
Depends
Deductible only if the family member genuinely does the work and the pay is what you would pay a stranger for that job.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Two things must both be true: real services were rendered, and the amount is market related for those services. If the work is genuine but the salary is inflated, SARS can disallow the excess as expenditure not laid out for the purposes of trade. If no work is done at all, none of it is deductible and the payment is really a gift or a distribution of profit. Keep the same evidence you would keep for any employee: a contract, job description, timesheets or duty records, payslips and an IRP5.
Where people go wrong
Putting a spouse or child on the payroll purely to shift income into a lower bracket, with no job to point to. It is one of the first things a verification looks at in a small business, and the payment also has to go into the family member's own tax return as income, so the family only wins if the split is real.
Does buying it save you tax?
Where the work is genuine, yes, it is a normal deductible cost and moving income to a lower bracket family member is legitimate. Where it is a paper arrangement it is not a tax saving, it is an understatement waiting to be found.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Understatement penalty percentages
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Skills Development Levy (SDL)
Deductible
SDL is a deductible cost, and if you train staff you may be able to claim part of it back as a grant.
You can claim this · Company
SDL is payable by employers whose annual payroll exceeds a prescribed threshold, and is calculated as a percentage of leviable payroll. It is deductible as a cost of trade. Employers who register with their SETA and submit a workplace skills plan and annual training report can recover a portion as a mandatory grant, and discretionary grants exist for learnerships and bursaries. That recovery is income when received.
Where people go wrong
Paying SDL for years and never claiming the mandatory grant back because nobody registered with the SETA or filed the workplace skills plan by the deadline. The money is simply forfeited. The other trap is not registering for SDL at all once the payroll grows past the threshold.
Does buying it save you tax?
Compulsory once you are over the threshold. The real value is on the recovery side: if you train staff anyway, registering with the SETA turns a pure levy into a partial refund. Worth an hour of admin.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Learnership allowance
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Staff bonus or thirteenth cheque
Deductible
Bonuses you pay staff are deductible, but PAYE must be withheld on them and it is usually withheld too little.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
For the employer this is simply more remuneration and it is deductible. The timing question is when the liability was actually incurred: a bonus that is unconditional and quantified at year end can generally be deducted in that year even if paid later, while a discretionary bonus not yet declared usually cannot. On the employee side, variable remuneration such as a bonus or commission has its own timing rule for when it is treated as accrued and taxed.
Where people go wrong
Payroll taxes the bonus as if it were a normal month's pay, which pushes far too little PAYE through, and the employee gets an unexpected assessment at filing. The employer trap is accruing a bonus in the accounts that was still entirely discretionary at year end and claiming it early.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible for you, taxed in the employee's hands at their marginal rate. If you want the employee to feel it, warn them about the PAYE before it lands, not after.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Employer paid the wrong PAYE on a bonus
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Staff canteen, subsidised meals and tea and coffee
Deductible
Deductible as a staff cost, but VAT input tax on meals is denied and a proper canteen benefit can be taxable on the employee.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Tea, coffee, milk and basic refreshments for staff and visitors are small operating costs and deduct without difficulty. A subsidised canteen also deducts. For the employee, the Seventh Schedule taxes meals and refreshments supplied by an employer, but with exclusions for meals supplied in a canteen or dining room operated by the employer for staff generally, and for refreshments during working hours. VAT input tax on entertainment, which includes food and drink, is denied except in narrow cases such as certain employer canteens charging a consideration.
Where people go wrong
Claiming VAT on the grocery run. The entertainment denial catches food and drink, and it is one of the most common small VAT audit adjustments. The second trap is subsidising individual meals for a few senior people, which looks nothing like a canteen for staff generally and is a taxable benefit.
Does buying it save you tax?
The income tax deduction is real but small. Feed people because it is good for the workplace. Just budget for it VAT inclusive, because you will not be claiming that back.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Entertainment input tax is denied
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Staff transport to and from work
Deductible
The cost of transporting staff is deductible, and free transport in a company vehicle is normally not a taxable benefit for the employee.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Fuel, the driver, the shuttle contract or the taxi money are all business costs and deduct. On the employee side, the Seventh Schedule generally does not tax transport that the employer supplies for employees as a group between home and work in a vehicle used for that purpose. A cash transport allowance is different: cash paid to the employee is remuneration and is taxed. Input tax on a motor car as defined is denied for VAT, though a bus or a bakkie may fall outside that definition.
Where people go wrong
Paying cash instead of providing transport. A transport allowance in cash is taxed as remuneration, while the same value provided as an actual shuttle is generally not, so employers hand employees a worse outcome for the same money. Second trap: claiming VAT input tax on a vehicle that meets the motor car definition.
Does buying it save you tax?
Providing the transport rather than paying an allowance is usually the better structure for both sides. Deductible either way, but the employee keeps more when it is provided in kind.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Motor car input tax is denied
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Staff uniforms and branded workwear
Deductible
Clothing that is a genuine uniform, distinctive and required for work, is deductible for the employer and not taxed on the employee.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Two things make it work: the clothing must be a real uniform that the employer requires to be worn while on duty, and it must be clearly distinguishable from ordinary clothes, which in practice means branding, a distinctive colour and design, or protective purpose. Overalls, embroidered golf shirts, kitchen whites, security uniforms and branded delivery shirts all qualify. Where those conditions are met, supplying the uniform is not a taxable benefit for the employee under the Seventh Schedule uniform provision.
Where people go wrong
Plain clothing bought at a chain store, then claimed as a uniform because staff were told to wear black trousers and a white shirt. If it can be worn on a Saturday without anyone noticing, it is not a uniform. Adding a small logo to items that are otherwise ordinary fashion clothing does not automatically save it.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible and, done properly, a tax free benefit to staff, which is better than paying them extra to buy their own. Brand it properly, that is what makes the difference.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Study fees you pay for yourself while employed on a salary
Not deductible
If you are a salaried employee paying your own study fees, you get no deduction, even if the qualification is directly for your job.
There is no relief for this · Salaried employee
The Act limits what an employee may deduct against salary to a short list, and study costs are not on it. It makes no difference that your employer required the qualification or that it led to a promotion. The routes that do work are the employer paying it as a bursary, which can be exempt in your hands, or the employer reimbursing you against proof, which is generally not taxable if structured correctly.
Where people go wrong
Claiming tuition under other deductions on the ITR12 and having the whole return pulled for verification. The bigger practical loss is not asking the employer to pay it as a bursary instead, which is worth more than any deduction would have been.
Does buying it save you tax?
There is no tax relief for you here at all. Before you pay it yourself, ask your employer to fund it as a bursary. Same money to them, deductible for them, and potentially tax free for you.
Authority s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
may unlock Employer bursary exemption
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Team building day or staff offsite
Depends
Deductible where it is genuinely about the business and the staff, but the entertainment and accommodation parts carry VAT and fringe benefit issues.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A facilitated team building or strategy session with an agenda is a staff cost and deducts. The more the day looks like a paid holiday, the weaker it gets, and an offsite with overnight accommodation and partners invited needs to be split. VAT input tax on the entertainment element, and generally on accommodation used for entertainment, is denied, so do not claim it. Keep the agenda and the attendance list.
Where people go wrong
A weekend away at a game lodge with families, called team building. The private and family portion is not deductible, and where individual employees receive an identifiable private benefit it can be a fringe benefit. The routine smaller error is claiming VAT on the whole invoice.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible when it is real, so it costs you the net of your marginal rate. Do not scale it up for the deduction, and expect to lose the VAT on the food and accommodation.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Entertainment input tax is denied
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Training course for your staff
Deductible
Training that improves staff at the job they already do for you is fully deductible.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Course fees, materials, the trainer's fee and the venue all deduct in the year incurred. Training an existing employee to do their current job better is a revenue expense. Where the employer pays for a formal qualification rather than a short course, the bursary rules come into play for whether the benefit is taxable in the employee's hands. Keep the invoice and a note of who attended and why.
Where people go wrong
Assuming the training is automatically tax free for the employee. Short job related training is normally not a taxable benefit, but paying for a full qualification is treated under the bursary exemption with its own conditions and caps, and going over those caps creates a fringe benefit that should have gone through payroll.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible and usually a genuinely good spend. If your payroll is over the SDL threshold, register with the SETA first so training you were doing anyway can also pull a mandatory grant.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Employer bursary exemption
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
UIF contributions you pay as the employer
Deductible
The employer's share of UIF is a deductible business cost, the employee's share is not yours to claim.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
UIF is split between employer and employee. The employer's own contribution is a cost of employing people and is deductible. The employee's half is deducted from their pay and is part of the gross salary you already claim, so do not claim it twice as a separate expense. Contributions are capped by reference to a prescribed earnings ceiling that changes, so check the current figure rather than assuming.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the total UIF payment made to SARS as a separate expense on top of gross salaries. The employee half is already inside the gross wage deduction, so claiming both is a double deduction.
Does buying it save you tax?
Compulsory, so the question of worth does not arise. It is deductible, which softens it slightly, but it is a levy not an investment.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Wages paid to an apprentice or intern
Deductible
Apprentice and intern pay is deductible like any wage, and it may also qualify for the learnership allowance or ETI.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The wage or stipend itself is an ordinary deduction. What people miss is the layer on top: if the apprenticeship is registered as a learnership with a SETA, the s12H allowance applies as well, and if the person is young and paid within the qualifying band, the employment tax incentive may reduce your PAYE payment. A stipend paid to an intern is still remuneration for PAYE and UIF purposes unless a specific exclusion applies, so run it through payroll rather than calling it a bursary.
Where people go wrong
Calling a stipend a bursary to avoid PAYE. A bursary exemption has its own conditions and does not cover payment for work done. If the person is working for you, it is remuneration.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible, and potentially much better than that if you register the agreement and check ETI eligibility. The tax system actively favours training young workers here, so it is worth the admin.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Learnership allowance
may unlock Employment tax incentive
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Year end function or staff party
Deductible
A staff function is deductible for income tax as a staff welfare cost, but you cannot claim the VAT input tax on it.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Entertaining your own staff is accepted as expenditure in the production of income, so the venue, catering and drinks deduct. VAT is different: input tax on entertainment is specifically denied, so claim the full VAT inclusive amount as an income tax expense and do not put it in your VAT return. Occasional, modest staff functions are generally not treated as a taxable fringe benefit for employees, but lavish or individually attributable benefits are a different question.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the VAT. The entertainment denial in the VAT Act catches staff functions, and it is a routine finding on a VAT audit. The second trap is a function that is really the owner's family celebration with two employees invited.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible, so it costs you the net of your marginal rate. Do it because it is worth doing for the team, not for the deduction, and remember you lose the VAT.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Entertainment input tax is denied
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Staff
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.