Filing season open067 465 2243Tax Pig ↗
// THE CATALOGUE

YOU BOUGHT A THING.WHAT HAPPENS?

Type what you actually bought or did. Not a section of the Act, the real thing: a borehole, a kettle for the office, a loan to your brother, a contract your attorney drew up.

Every item, grouped by what the law does with it.

16 answers for “borehole”

Start again

A shared borehole, water tank or solar system split between two or more households or businesses

Apportioned

Where several parties draw off one physical source, the fair claim is by metered or estimated share of use, documented once in a simple usage-split agreement rather than re-argued every year.

Claim the business share only · Anyone

This is the direct parallel to splitting one fuel tank between a generator and a car, which the catalogue already covers for diesel. See also the sub-metering equipment item, which is the physical fix for this exact problem.

Where people go wrong

Without a documented split, either everyone under-claims out of caution or everyone over-claims the same litre of water, and both failure modes are visible the moment two connected returns are compared.

Work out your share

Enter a cost and a percentage. The percentage has to be one you can defend with something real, floor area for a room, a logbook for a vehicle, an itemised bill for a phone.

Does buying it save you tax?

Worth the one-time cost of a sub-meter or a written formula: it turns an unclaimable grey area into a defensible apportioned deduction for every party sharing the source.

Authority s11(a) governed by Apportionment for part of a property or part of a year may unlock General deduction for expenditure in producing income Private, informal and neighbour arrangements
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole drilled at a property you rent out

Base cost only

A new borehole at a let property is an improvement, so you cannot deduct it against the rent, but it does add to your base cost for capital gains tax later.

No deduction now, it reduces tax when you sell · Landlord

The rental deduction rules allow running costs and repairs, not the creation of something that was not there before. A first borehole is new capacity and is therefore an improvement. Keep the invoice for as long as you own the property, because it lifts your base cost and reduces the capital gain when you sell. The pump and pressure equipment are a separate question and may qualify for wear and tear against the rental income.

Where people go wrong

Claiming the borehole in the year you drill it because the water serves the tenants. It is the single most common improvement-dressed-as-a-repair claim in rental returns, and SARS reverses it on verification. Replacing a borehole pump that has failed is a repair; drilling a hole that never existed is not.

Does buying it save you tax?

There is no immediate tax saving. The relief arrives only when you sell, and only at the effective capital gains rate, which is well under your marginal rate. Drill it if it makes the property lettable or cheaper to run.

Authority s11(a) read with 8th Schedule para 20 governed by Repairs are deductible, improvements are not may unlock Improvements to a let property increase base cost Property
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole drilled at business premises you own

Capital allowance

Drilling the hole is capital, so you cannot write it off in one year, but the pump and tank equipment can usually be depreciated.

A specific capital write-off applies · Company

Sinking a borehole creates something permanent in the ground and that part is capital expenditure, blocked by the capital exclusion in the general deduction formula. Split the invoice: the drilling, casing and civils sit in the cost of the property, while the pump, motor, pressure tank and control gear are machinery and normally qualify for wear and tear. If the borehole is a genuine building improvement to a commercial building that already qualifies for the building allowance, the cost may be added to the allowance base instead.

Where people go wrong

Taking the whole borehole invoice as a repair or a running cost because the water is used in the business. SARS looks at what was created, not what the water is for. Get the contractor to itemise drilling versus equipment before you pay, because you cannot split it credibly afterwards.

Does buying it save you tax?

It is a real business asset and the equipment portion does come back to you over time at your marginal rate, but you get nothing like the full price back and nothing at all in year one for the hole itself. Drill it because municipal water is unreliable or expensive, not for the tax.

Authority s11(a) read with s11(e) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Wear and tear on business assets Property
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole drilled at your own private home

Base cost only

No tax deduction at all for a borehole at the house you live in, but keep the invoice because it adds to your base cost if the home is ever taxable on sale.

No deduction now, it reduces tax when you sell · Anyone

Nothing spent on your private residence is deductible, because there is no trade producing income. The cost is an improvement and goes into base cost. For most people the primary residence exclusion swallows the gain anyway, so the invoice may never be used. It matters if the home is worth well above the exclusion, if you have a qualifying home office area, or if you later move out and let the property.

Where people go wrong

Believing that because water is a necessity or because of drought restrictions there is some relief. There is none. Also, people file the invoice nowhere and then cannot prove the improvement fifteen years later when it would actually have reduced a taxable gain.

Does buying it save you tax?

Zero tax benefit now. Buy it for water security, not for tax.

Authority 8th Schedule para 20 excluded by Primary residence exclusion governed by Base cost includes far more than the purchase price Property
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole drilled for a non-farming business (the contrast case)

Base cost only

The same borehole at a shop, office, factory or guesthouse gets no First Schedule treatment and is normally a non-deductible capital improvement to the property.

No deduction now, it reduces tax when you sell · Sole proprietor or freelancer

This is the clearest illustration of why farming is different. Outside the First Schedule, sinking a borehole is expenditure of a capital nature, so the general deduction formula is blocked and there is no wear and tear allowance for a hole in the ground. The cost generally goes into the base cost of the property for capital gains purposes instead. Removable equipment such as the pump, tank and pipework is a separate question and may qualify for wear and tear.

Where people go wrong

Business owners hear from a farming friend that a borehole is claimable and put the whole invoice through the income statement. SARS disallows it as capital. Split the invoice: the drilling and casing is capital, the pump and pressure system is plant.

Does buying it save you tax?

As a tax play, no. Load shedding and municipal water failures may make it worth it operationally, but expect base cost relief years later rather than a deduction now.

Authority s11(a) read with s23(g) excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Base cost includes far more than the purchase price Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole or dam sunk on a working farm

Capital allowance

Farmers get a special capital development allowance for boreholes, dams and water works that other businesses do not get.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

The First Schedule treats certain farming capital development expenditure, including the sinking of boreholes and wells and the building of dams and water furrows, differently from ordinary capital spending. There are limits on how much can be set off against farming income in a year, with the balance carried forward. You must be carrying on genuine farming operations, not simply owning a smallholding.

Where people go wrong

Assuming the whole cost comes off this year's farming income. The capital development allowance is capped against farming income and the excess carries forward, so a big borehole in a bad year gives you far less than you expected. Also, a lifestyle smallholding that does not trade as a farm gets none of this.

Does buying it save you tax?

This is one of the genuinely favourable regimes in the Act. If you actually farm and actually need the water, the deduction is real and meaningful. It is still not free money: you get your marginal rate back, spread over the years the cap allows.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Capital development expenditure Property
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole pump, motor and equipping the hole

Capital allowance

The pump and equipment that make the borehole work are farming machinery and are written off over a short period, separate from the drilling itself.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Drilling is development work under the First Schedule. The pump, motor, control box, rising main and storage tank are machinery, implements and articles brought into use for farming, which are written off on the accelerated three year basis for farmers. Keep the driller's invoice and the equipping invoice apart so each goes to the right regime.

Where people go wrong

One combined invoice from the drilling contractor for drilling plus equipping gets claimed entirely under one heading. Ask the contractor to itemise before you pay.

Does buying it save you tax?

You need water to farm, so this is a real cost, not a tax play. The accelerated write off does mean the relief comes through faster than ordinary wear and tear.

Authority s12B governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole pump, pressure tank and pipework at business premises

Wear and tear

The moving parts of a borehole, the pump, motor and pressure tank, are plant and can be written off over their useful life against business income.

Written off over time, not all at once · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Equipment that can be removed and replaced without demolishing anything is treated as machinery or plant rather than part of the structure. SARS publishes suggested write-off periods for asset classes and you should use the closest published class rather than inventing your own life. Buried pipework laid into the ground is more likely to be treated as part of the structure and therefore capital.

Where people go wrong

Writing off the whole equipping invoice including the trenching, slab and buried pipes. Only the removable plant qualifies. The second trap is small item full write-off: a pump usually costs well above the small item threshold, so it must be depreciated rather than expensed.

Does buying it save you tax?

Yes, in the sense that the cost does eventually come off your taxable income. No, in the sense that spreading it over years at your marginal rate is a fraction of what you paid. Buy the pump you need.

Authority s11(e) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Property
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole sunk on a farm used for farming operations

Capital allowance

A borehole on a working farm is claimable as capital development expenditure under the First Schedule, which is far more generous than the normal rule that treats a borehole as pure capital.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

The First Schedule to the Income Tax Act lists a specific set of farm development works, including the sinking of boreholes and wells, and lets a genuine farmer write the cost off against farming income instead of burying it in base cost. The claim is capped by reference to your farming income for the year, and the part you cannot use is carried forward to future years rather than lost. You must actually be carrying on farming operations, not just own land with water on it.

Where people go wrong

People assume the borehole is deducted in full in the year they pay for it. It is not: the First Schedule limits how much capital development expenditure you may set off in one year, so a big borehole in a bad season mostly rolls forward. Also, a borehole drilled for the farmhouse garden and household water is private, not farming.

Does buying it save you tax?

If you were going to sink the borehole anyway, the First Schedule treatment is genuinely valuable, because the alternative for a non-farmer is no deduction at all. But it still only returns your marginal rate, and only when you have farming income to set it against. Do not drill for the tax.

Authority First Schedule para 12 excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole water quality testing, required for compliance or by an insurer

Deductible

A deductible compliance and running cost, separate from the borehole's own capital treatment.

You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Recurring testing is an ordinary running cost, not a capital item.

Where people go wrong

None specific.

Does buying it save you tax?

Worth claiming every time it is done.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Property
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Renting a borehole, water point or right of access from a neighbour who isn't in business

Depends

The rent is deductible against trade income exactly like renting anything else, but a private individual almost never issues a tax invoice, so the standard of proof shifts from a tax invoice to a written agreement, a bank trail and a receipt.

The answer turns on the facts · Anyone

A dated written agreement stating what is rented, the amount and the payment terms, an EFT reference that ties the payment to it, and a receipt from the neighbour, even handwritten, together stand in for the tax invoice that a private, non-vendor counterparty cannot issue. There is no VAT input to claim either way, because the neighbour is not a registered vendor.

Where people go wrong

Paying a family member, or someone who lives on the same property, for their borehole invites scrutiny of whether the price is market related and whether the money genuinely moved. Connected party rentals get more attention, not less.

Does buying it save you tax?

Yes, if the water is genuinely needed for the trade and the rent is real. The paperwork discipline matters more here than for a paid supplier, because no third party is reporting the same transaction back to SARS on your behalf.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Record retention obligation Private, informal and neighbour arrangements
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

The neighbour's side: declaring rent, hire or a fee received for a borehole, room, driveway or wifi

Depends

Whatever a neighbour is paid for water, parking, storage or wifi is their taxable income, declarable whether or not an invoice was ever raised.

The answer turns on the facts · Anyone

What one side claims as rent and what the other side should be declaring as rental income are meant to be the same number. This item exists so the product's evidence layer treats both ends of an informal arrangement together, rather than only ever showing the payer the deduction and staying silent about the receiver's obligation.

Where people go wrong

No invoice does not mean invisible. Cash received for a service is still income, and undeclared informal rent is exactly the kind of thing a bank data match surfaces once third party reporting improves.

Does buying it save you tax?

For the payer, yes, it is a legitimate deduction. For the receiver, declaring it properly is what keeps the payer's deduction defensible, it is a shared exposure, not a private one.

Authority s1 governed by Short term letting is still rental income may unlock Voluntary disclosure programme Private, informal and neighbour arrangements
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Water use licence application for a business borehole

Deductible

A compliance cost distinct from the capital cost of drilling the hole itself, already listed in the catalogue.

You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer

The application fee itself is a deductible compliance running cost, separate from the borehole's own capital allowance or base cost treatment.

Where people go wrong

Bundling the licence fee into the capital cost of the borehole and losing a straightforward deduction.

Does buying it save you tax?

Worth claiming separately from the borehole itself.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Capital development expenditure Property
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Solar pumping system on the farm

Capital allowance

Solar panels and inverters that run farm pumps are business assets with an accelerated write off, and there are two possible regimes so the better one should be chosen deliberately.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

A solar installation used in the farming operation can fall under the farming machinery allowance or the renewable energy allowance for business, both of which are faster than ordinary wear and tear. Mounting structures, cabling and the inverter usually go with the panels. The residential solar rebate for individuals is a different thing entirely and does not apply to farm production assets.

Where people go wrong

Claiming a system that mainly powers the farmhouse as a farming asset. If the array runs the house and the pump, apportion. Farmers also try to claim the individual solar rebate as well as the business allowance on the same panels.

Does buying it save you tax?

This is one of the genuinely strong ones. Accelerated relief plus a real reduction in diesel and Eskom cost. Still, buy the system you need for the pumping load, not the biggest one your accountant can write off.

Authority s12B excluded by Solar panel rebate for individuals governed by Renewable energy allowance for business Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Water on the municipal account where there is a home office

Apportioned

Water is a premises running cost, but it is a weak claim because a home office consumes almost no water and SARS looks at it that way.

Claim the business share only · Anyone

Where the home office qualifies, the floor-area share of water on the municipal account is arguably claimable in the same way as rates and electricity. In practice the amounts are tiny and the connection between an office and water consumption is thin, which makes it a poor place to be aggressive. For a business that actually uses water in its trade the position is different and stronger.

Where people go wrong

Padding the claim with the whole water and sanitation line because it sits on the same bill as the rates. If the office does not use the water, the claim is hard to defend.

Work out your share

Enter a cost and a percentage. The percentage has to be one you can defend with something real, floor area for a room, a logbook for a vehicle, an itemised bill for a phone.

Does buying it save you tax?

Barely. The rand value is negligible and it adds audit risk to a bigger claim.

Authority s23(b) governed by Home office for a sole proprietor governed by Home office expenditure Home office
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Buying the farm or smallholding itself (the land)

Base cost only

The price of the land is never deductible, no matter how generous the First Schedule is about what you build on it.

No deduction now, it reduces tax when you sell · Farmer

The purchase price, transfer duty, conveyancing and bond registration costs are capital and go into base cost for capital gains tax when you eventually sell. What is deductible is the interest on the bond used to buy farming land, to the extent the land is used in the farming trade. The development works you carry out afterwards, boreholes, fencing, dams and roads, are the part the First Schedule helps with.

Where people go wrong

Assuming that because a borehole and a fence are claimable, the farm itself is too. It is not, and the difference between the land and the improvements is the single most misunderstood point in farm tax. Also note that on eventual sale, land beyond two hectares falls outside any primary residence exclusion.

Does buying it save you tax?

Buy land for what it will produce or because you want to live on it. There is no tax deduction for the land, and the interest deduction only helps to the extent you are genuinely farming.

Authority s11(a) read with s23(g) governed by Base cost includes far more than the purchase price may unlock Interest incurred on business borrowing may unlock Land beyond two hectares is outside the residence exclusion Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Why so many of these say no

Because that is the truth, and a catalogue that never says no is a brochure. Most spending does not become cheaper because it is deductible: a deduction reduces your taxable income, so you get back your marginal rate, not the price. The money in a tax return is almost never in buying more things. It is in the claims you already qualify for and never made, and in being able to prove them.

Check what your own records support