Filing season open067 465 2243Tax Pig ↗
// THE CATALOGUE

YOU BOUGHT A THING.WHAT HAPPENS?

Type what you actually bought or did. Not a section of the Act, the real thing: a borehole, a kettle for the office, a loan to your brother, a contract your attorney drew up.

Every item, grouped by what the law does with it.

Farming · 45 items

Start again

Agricultural co-op membership and service fees

Deductible

Fees paid to an agricultural co-operative for storage, handling, grading and membership services are deductible farming costs.

You can claim this · Farmer

Storage, handling, drying, grading and marketing commission are running costs of getting produce to market. Buying shares in the co-operative, however, is an investment, not a deduction, and any bonus or dividend distributed back to you may be income.

Where people go wrong

Deducting the co-op share subscription along with the service fees. The shares are capital. Also, patronage bonuses and rebates received should be brought into income rather than netted off quietly.

Does buying it save you tax?

Ordinary cost of marketing a crop. Read the co-op statement carefully so shares, levies, interest and service fees are split correctly.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Barn, grain store or silo

Capital allowance

A barn, grain store or silo used to store your own produce is farm development expenditure, though a bolted steel silo may instead be plant.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

A fixed structure erected for the farming operation falls in the development basket. A demountable silo or bulk bin that is really equipment can be treated as farming machinery on the faster write off, which is often better because it escapes the development cap. Look at what the thing actually is, not what it is called on the quote.

Where people go wrong

Storing other people's grain for a fee is a separate trade. If the silo earns storage income rather than serving your own crop, the farming treatment is not automatic.

Does buying it save you tax?

Storage lets you sell off the peak instead of at harvest, which is usually worth more than the deduction.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure may unlock Wear and tear on business assets Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole drilled for a non-farming business (the contrast case)

Base cost only

The same borehole at a shop, office, factory or guesthouse gets no First Schedule treatment and is normally a non-deductible capital improvement to the property.

No deduction now, it reduces tax when you sell · Sole proprietor or freelancer

This is the clearest illustration of why farming is different. Outside the First Schedule, sinking a borehole is expenditure of a capital nature, so the general deduction formula is blocked and there is no wear and tear allowance for a hole in the ground. The cost generally goes into the base cost of the property for capital gains purposes instead. Removable equipment such as the pump, tank and pipework is a separate question and may qualify for wear and tear.

Where people go wrong

Business owners hear from a farming friend that a borehole is claimable and put the whole invoice through the income statement. SARS disallows it as capital. Split the invoice: the drilling and casing is capital, the pump and pressure system is plant.

Does buying it save you tax?

As a tax play, no. Load shedding and municipal water failures may make it worth it operationally, but expect base cost relief years later rather than a deduction now.

Authority s11(a) read with s23(g) excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Base cost includes far more than the purchase price Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole pump, motor and equipping the hole

Capital allowance

The pump and equipment that make the borehole work are farming machinery and are written off over a short period, separate from the drilling itself.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Drilling is development work under the First Schedule. The pump, motor, control box, rising main and storage tank are machinery, implements and articles brought into use for farming, which are written off on the accelerated three year basis for farmers. Keep the driller's invoice and the equipping invoice apart so each goes to the right regime.

Where people go wrong

One combined invoice from the drilling contractor for drilling plus equipping gets claimed entirely under one heading. Ask the contractor to itemise before you pay.

Does buying it save you tax?

You need water to farm, so this is a real cost, not a tax play. The accelerated write off does mean the relief comes through faster than ordinary wear and tear.

Authority s12B governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Borehole sunk on a farm used for farming operations

Capital allowance

A borehole on a working farm is claimable as capital development expenditure under the First Schedule, which is far more generous than the normal rule that treats a borehole as pure capital.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

The First Schedule to the Income Tax Act lists a specific set of farm development works, including the sinking of boreholes and wells, and lets a genuine farmer write the cost off against farming income instead of burying it in base cost. The claim is capped by reference to your farming income for the year, and the part you cannot use is carried forward to future years rather than lost. You must actually be carrying on farming operations, not just own land with water on it.

Where people go wrong

People assume the borehole is deducted in full in the year they pay for it. It is not: the First Schedule limits how much capital development expenditure you may set off in one year, so a big borehole in a bad season mostly rolls forward. Also, a borehole drilled for the farmhouse garden and household water is private, not farming.

Does buying it save you tax?

If you were going to sink the borehole anyway, the First Schedule treatment is genuinely valuable, because the alternative for a non-farmer is no deduction at all. But it still only returns your marginal rate, and only when you have farming income to set it against. Do not drill for the tax.

Authority First Schedule para 12 excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Bridge or river crossing on the farm

Capital allowance

A bridge or crossing built so the farming operation can move across water is First Schedule capital development expenditure.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Bridges sit with roads in the development list. As always, the deduction in a year is limited by farming income and the excess carries forward. If the crossing is shared with neighbours or a municipality, only your share of the cost is yours to claim.

Where people go wrong

Contributing to a shared or public crossing and claiming the whole cost. Claim what you actually paid and can prove.

Does buying it save you tax?

Infrastructure spend. Worth it if the farm cannot function without it, not because of the deduction.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Buying the farm or smallholding itself (the land)

Base cost only

The price of the land is never deductible, no matter how generous the First Schedule is about what you build on it.

No deduction now, it reduces tax when you sell · Farmer

The purchase price, transfer duty, conveyancing and bond registration costs are capital and go into base cost for capital gains tax when you eventually sell. What is deductible is the interest on the bond used to buy farming land, to the extent the land is used in the farming trade. The development works you carry out afterwards, boreholes, fencing, dams and roads, are the part the First Schedule helps with.

Where people go wrong

Assuming that because a borehole and a fence are claimable, the farm itself is too. It is not, and the difference between the land and the improvements is the single most misunderstood point in farm tax. Also note that on eventual sale, land beyond two hectares falls outside any primary residence exclusion.

Does buying it save you tax?

Buy land for what it will produce or because you want to live on it. There is no tax deduction for the land, and the interest deduction only helps to the extent you are genuinely farming.

Authority s11(a) read with s23(g) governed by Base cost includes far more than the purchase price may unlock Interest incurred on business borrowing may unlock Land beyond two hectares is outside the residence exclusion Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Clearing land, stumping and removing bush

Capital allowance

Clearing and preparing land for cultivation, and eradicating invasive or noxious plants, is on the First Schedule capital development list.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

This covers stumping, grubbing, removing bush and the initial preparation of land for planting, as well as the eradication of noxious plants. It is one of the clearest cases where farming beats ordinary business rules, because for anyone else this is straightforward capital improvement of land with no deduction at all.

Where people go wrong

Clearing done to make land ready for a residential development, a lodge or a subdivision to sell is not farming development expenditure. If the real purpose is to realise the land, expect SARS to say so.

Does buying it save you tax?

Genuine improvement to productive capacity, with a deduction attached that no other business would get. Still rationed against farming income.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Combine harvester or self propelled harvester

Capital allowance

A harvester is farming machinery on the accelerated write off, but if you contract it out to other farmers part of the income is not farming income.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

The allowance itself is straightforward. The complication is contracting: harvesting for neighbours for a fee is generally a separate service trade, which affects both the apportionment of the asset and the farming income figure that caps your capital development expenditure claim.

Where people go wrong

Running a full contracting business off the farm's books and calling it all farming. It inflates the farming income used for other calculations and it is the kind of thing that unravels badly on audit.

Does buying it save you tax?

The most expensive machine on most grain farms. Compare owning against hiring a contractor honestly, including the recoupment when you sell. Tax relief does not close a gap that big.

Authority s12B governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Recoupment when an asset is sold Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Crop and hail insurance

Deductible

Premiums to insure a crop or the farming assets are deductible, and any payout you receive is taxable income.

You can claim this · Farmer

The premium is a running cost of the trade. The other half people forget is that the claim proceeds come back into income, and a large hail payout can create a spike in taxable income in a year with no crop to sell. The farming rating formula exists partly to soften exactly this kind of spike.

Where people go wrong

Deducting the premium and then not declaring the payout, or being caught out by the tax on a payout in a disaster year when the cash has already gone on replanting. Insurance on the farmhouse and household contents is private and not deductible.

Does buying it save you tax?

Yes, on risk grounds, in a hail belt. The deduction is a small discount on the premium, the real value is not losing a season.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Rating formula for fluctuating farming income Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Dam built on the farm

Capital allowance

Constructing a dam on a farm is listed capital development expenditure and is claimable against farming income under the First Schedule.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Dams, water furrows and similar water works appear in the First Schedule list of qualifying development expenditure. The same annual cap by reference to farming income applies, with the excess carried forward. Repairs to an existing dam wall are a different question and are usually an ordinary repair deduction rather than development expenditure.

Where people go wrong

A dam built mainly as a fishing or leisure feature at the farmhouse is not farming development expenditure, even though it is on the farm. The test is use in the farming operation.

Does buying it save you tax?

Water security is usually worth it on its own merits. The tax treatment is unusually good compared with any other business building a dam, but it is still relief at your marginal rate and it is rationed year by year.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Diesel for farming and the diesel refund

Deductible

Diesel used in farming is fully deductible, and a registered farmer can separately claim a refund of part of the fuel levies on qualifying farming use.

You can claim this · Farmer

These are two different reliefs. The income tax deduction is the cost of the diesel as a running expense. The diesel refund is an excise refund for primary production users, claimed through the VAT return by a farmer registered for it, and it requires detailed logbooks of litres used per activity and vehicle. If you receive a refund, it reduces the effective cost, so do not deduct the refunded portion again.

Where people go wrong

The refund claim is the one SARS audits hardest in farming. Refunds get reversed years later because the logbooks do not distinguish qualifying from non qualifying use, or because road going vehicles were included. Keep the storage tank readings, the dip records and the per vehicle logs from day one.

Does buying it save you tax?

The refund is one of the few genuine cash back items in farming, not just a deduction. It is worth the paperwork, but only if the paperwork is actually done.

governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Dipping and spraying of livestock

Deductible

Dip, pour ons and the cost of dipping the herd are ordinary deductible farming costs.

You can claim this · Farmer

The chemicals and the labour are running costs. Building a dip tank or a spray race, however, is a structure and is more likely capital development expenditure under the First Schedule rather than a current deduction.

Where people go wrong

Putting the construction of a new dip tank or spray race through as consumables. The chemical is a running cost, the structure is not.

Does buying it save you tax?

Tick borne disease costs more than the dip. Deduct it and move on.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Drought and disaster losses

Depends

Losses from drought, fire or flood are recognised through the normal farming account, and there are specific First Schedule reliefs that only apply if you use them correctly.

The answer turns on the facts · Farmer

Stock that dies is simply not there at year end, which reduces closing stock and therefore taxable income, provided you record it. Assets destroyed may trigger a recoupment or a scrapping adjustment, and insurance or disaster grants received are income. Separately, the First Schedule contains relief aimed at drought and disaster situations, including deferral where livestock is sold off because of drought.

Where people go wrong

Not documenting the losses. Dead animals with no records, no photographs, no vet or extension officer confirmation and no dates are simply an unexplained drop in stock numbers, which is the hardest thing to defend on audit.

Does buying it save you tax?

There is nothing to buy. What matters is claiming what the disaster actually did to you, which requires records made at the time, not reconstructed later.

Authority First Schedule governed by Disaster and forced sale relief may unlock Recoupment when an asset is sold Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Electricity supply and power lines brought to the farm

Capital allowance

The cost of getting power onto the farm and carrying it to where it is used is on the First Schedule capital development list.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Carrying electricity from one point to another for the farming operation qualifies, which covers the reticulation to pump stations, sheds and lands. A connection fee paid to the utility, and any contribution to their infrastructure, should be tested separately because it may be a service charge rather than your asset.

Where people go wrong

Including the portion of the line that serves the farmhouse and any non farming activity. Apportion honestly, because the line to the house is private.

Does buying it save you tax?

You cannot pump water without power. The First Schedule treatment is a genuine advantage: an ordinary business gets no deduction for a power line at all.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Farm bakkie running costs

Apportioned

Running a bakkie on the farm is deductible for the farming use, and you have to be able to show the split between farm and private kilometres.

Claim the business share only · Farmer

Fuel, servicing, tyres, insurance and licence are deductible to the extent the vehicle is used in the farming operation. The vehicle itself is written off, though the write off basis for a passenger vehicle is not the same as for a tractor. On a farm the private portion is rarely zero, because the same bakkie fetches the children and goes to town.

Where people go wrong

Claiming one hundred percent because the bakkie never leaves the farm. Keep a simple logbook or at least a defensible basis. VAT is a separate trap: input tax on a double cab used as a passenger vehicle can be denied even where the income tax deduction is fine.

Work out your share

Enter a cost and a percentage. The percentage has to be one you can defend with something real, floor area for a room, a logbook for a vehicle, an itemised bill for a phone.

Does buying it save you tax?

Real cost of farming, claim it properly. Do not buy a bigger bakkie because it is deductible.

Authority s11(a) read with s23(g) excluded by Motor car input tax is denied governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Farm buildings and sheds used in the farming operation

Capital allowance

Buildings erected for the farming operation are claimable under the First Schedule, which is a much better outcome than the slow building allowances an ordinary business gets.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

The development list covers buildings used in connection with farming operations, other than a dwelling house not occupied by farm employees. So an implement shed, workshop, dairy, chicken house or piggery generally qualifies. The farmhouse you live in does not.

Where people go wrong

Trying to slip the farmhouse, a converted guest cottage or a home office extension into the shed claim. The exclusion of the farmer's own dwelling is explicit and it is one of the first things a reviewer looks for.

Does buying it save you tax?

Strongly favourable compared with the commercial building allowance an ordinary business would use. Still capped against farming income each year, with carry forward.

Authority First Schedule para 12 excluded by Commercial building allowance governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Farm labour wages and seasonal workers

Deductible

Wages paid to farm workers are fully deductible, provided you can prove who you paid and you meet your PAYE and UIF obligations.

You can claim this · Farmer

Permanent and seasonal wages, UIF, and the employer's contributions are deductible. The employment tax incentive may apply to qualifying young workers, which is a direct reduction of PAYE rather than a deduction. Rations and free accommodation given to workers raise separate fringe benefit and record keeping questions.

Where people go wrong

Cash wages with no worker names, ID numbers or signed wage register. A round cash figure for labour with no supporting record is one of the most commonly disallowed items in farming. SARS also cross checks whether anyone was registered for PAYE and UIF at all.

Does buying it save you tax?

Not optional spending. The tax point is simply that unrecorded cash wages cost you the deduction on top of the labour law exposure.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Employment tax incentive Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Farm manager's salary, including a family member

Deductible

A farm manager's salary is deductible, and paying a family member is fine as long as the person really does the work and is paid a market related amount through the payroll.

You can claim this · Farmer

The test is whether the expenditure is actually incurred in producing the farming income. A genuine salary to a son, daughter or spouse who manages the operation qualifies, and it is taxed in their hands, which can be efficient if their marginal rate is lower. It must go through PAYE, be supported by an employment record, and be an amount you would pay a stranger for the same job.

Where people go wrong

Paying a family member who does no real work purely to split income. That is the classic disallowance, and it can also draw a donations tax question. Paying yourself a salary out of your own sole proprietor farming business is not a deduction at all, because you cannot employ yourself.

Does buying it save you tax?

Where the work is real, this genuinely reduces household tax by moving income to a lower bracket. Where it is not real, it is a false claim with penalties attached.

Authority s11(a) read with s23(g) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Farm roads and access tracks

Capital allowance

Building roads on the farm for the farming operation is listed First Schedule capital development expenditure.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Construction of roads used in the farming operation qualifies. Regravelling and grading an existing road each year is more naturally an ordinary repair or running cost, deductible in full without the development cap.

Where people go wrong

The driveway to the farmhouse and the road built to serve a guest lodge or a subdivided plot are not farming roads. Apportion if the road serves both.

Does buying it save you tax?

You need to get to the lands. The tax treatment is a genuine advantage over any other business, which gets no deduction for a private road.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure may unlock Repairs to business property Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Feed, fodder and licks

Deductible

Feed bought for the herd or flock is an ordinary running cost of farming and is deductible in full in the year it is incurred.

You can claim this · Farmer

This includes bought in hay, lucerne, licks, concentrates and silage ingredients. Feed on hand at year end is produce and may need to be brought in as closing stock rather than fully deducted. Feed for the family horse or pets is private.

Where people go wrong

Buying a shed full of feed just before year end and deducting all of it. Unused feed on hand at year end is stock and comes back into the calculation.

Does buying it save you tax?

Straightforward cost of production. Claim it, keep the invoices, and do not confuse a stockpile with a deduction.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Livestock and produce on hand at standard values Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Fencing on the farm

Capital allowance

Fencing a farm is capital development expenditure under the First Schedule and is claimable against farming income, unlike fencing at an ordinary business.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Erecting fences, including internal camp fencing and boundary fencing used in the farming operation, is on the First Schedule list. Repairs to existing fencing are usually an ordinary repair deduction instead, which is often better because a repair is not subject to the development expenditure cap.

Where people go wrong

The fence around the farmhouse garden, the tennis court or a private lodge is not farming fencing. Farmers also often misclassify a like for like fence replacement as new development when it is really a repair that could have been claimed in full.

Does buying it save you tax?

You fence because of stock theft and predation, not tax. The relief is real but rationed against farming income.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure may unlock Repairs to business property Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Fertiliser and lime

Deductible

Fertiliser and lime applied to the lands are deductible farming inputs in the year applied.

You can claim this · Farmer

Even though lime has a benefit lasting several seasons, it is in practice treated as a running input rather than a capital improvement to land. Fertiliser sitting in the shed at year end is stock on hand and should not be fully deducted.

Where people go wrong

Prepaying a large fertiliser order before year end for the deduction. If it has not been delivered or is still on hand, the deduction is not simply yours, and SARS looks closely at year end input prepayments in farming.

Does buying it save you tax?

Buy it for the soil test result, not the tax year end. Prepaying inputs to shift a deduction is one of the most commonly challenged farming manoeuvres.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Livestock and produce on hand at standard values Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Forced sale of livestock because of drought

Depends

If drought forces you to sell livestock you did not plan to sell, the First Schedule allows the proceeds to be spread or deferred rather than taxed all in one brutal year.

The answer turns on the facts · Farmer

The relief is aimed at a farmer who destocks because of drought, stock disease or similar conditions and then restocks later. In broad terms the proceeds can be held over and brought into income over subsequent years, or set against the cost of replacement stock, subject to conditions including time limits and, in some cases, the area being formally declared. The mechanics and the election requirements are specific, so this is one to get applied properly rather than assumed.

Where people go wrong

Selling the herd, spending the money, and only discovering at assessment that the entire proceeds landed in one year at the top marginal rate. The relief usually requires an election and often has a deadline. Ask before you sell, not at tax time.

Does buying it save you tax?

This is one of the genuinely valuable farming provisions, and it is regularly missed. If you destocked in a drought year, raise it with your practitioner specifically by name.

Authority First Schedule governed by Disaster and forced sale relief may unlock Rating formula for fluctuating farming income Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Game bought or held on a game farm

Depends

Game farming can be farming for tax purposes, but game is not automatically livestock and the treatment of purchases and year end game numbers needs to be established for your specific operation.

The answer turns on the facts · Farmer

Whether an operation is farming, and whether particular game animals are trading stock with a value at year end, has been the subject of specific SARS rulings and practice rather than a simple statutory list. High value breeding game bought at auction is a particular area where the deduction has been challenged. Hunting and lodge income sitting alongside game breeding may not be farming income at all.

Where people go wrong

Assuming an expensive game purchase is deductible like cattle. Several game breeding structures sold on that assumption did not survive scrutiny. Also, mixing lodge and hunting income into farming income distorts the farming caps and the rating formula.

Does buying it save you tax?

Do not enter game breeding for the tax treatment. Establish the position in writing before you buy, ideally with a ruling or clear professional opinion.

governed by Livestock and produce on hand at standard values Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Generator for the farm

Capital allowance

A generator used in the farming operation is farming machinery and is written off on the accelerated basis, with the running diesel deductible as you use it.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

The unit itself is an asset. The diesel, servicing and filters are ordinary running costs deductible in the year. A generator that keeps the farmhouse on during load shedding is private, and one that does both should be apportioned on a defensible basis such as connected load or hours.

Where people go wrong

The whole generator claimed as farming when it is wired into the house distribution board. This is exactly the sort of thing that shows up when SARS asks for the electrician's certificate of compliance.

Does buying it save you tax?

If a power cut spoils milk or stops irrigation at a critical time, the generator pays for itself. The tax relief is a discount at your marginal rate, not a reason to buy.

Authority s12B governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Herd on hand at year end (closing stock)

Depends

The animals standing in your camps at year end are added back into income at their standard values, so a bigger herd means a bigger tax number even though nothing was sold.

The answer turns on the facts · Farmer

The farming account works as opening stock plus purchases plus costs, less closing stock. Natural increase raises the closing count without any purchase cost, so it increases taxable income. Deaths, theft and slaughter for the household all have to be recorded and are the reason a stock reconciliation is not optional.

Where people go wrong

Not counting. A farmer who guesses the year end herd, or who never records losses to theft and predation, will overstate closing stock and pay tax on animals that no longer exist. Household consumption also has to be accounted for rather than quietly ignored.

Does buying it save you tax?

Nothing to buy here. The value is in doing an honest annual count, which usually reduces the tax number rather than increasing it.

Authority First Schedule governed by Livestock and produce on hand at standard values Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Housing built on the farm for farm employees

Capital allowance

Homes built on the farm and occupied by farm employees are claimable development expenditure, unlike the farmer's own house.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

The First Schedule allows expenditure on dwellings occupied by employees engaged in the farming operation. There is a per dwelling limit in the legislation, so a large or high specification house may only be partly claimable, and the amount has been changed over the years. The house must actually be occupied by employees, not standing empty or let to outsiders.

Where people go wrong

Two traps. First, assuming the whole cost qualifies when a per dwelling ceiling applies. Second, later letting the cottage on a holiday platform, which changes the use and can put the earlier claim in question. Providing free accommodation also raises a fringe benefit question on the employee side.

Does buying it save you tax?

Worth it where you need staff on site. Check the per dwelling limit before you sign the building contract, not after.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure may unlock Employer provided accommodation Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Implement such as a plough, planter, baler or sprayer

Capital allowance

Farm implements get the same accelerated write off as the tractor that pulls them.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Implements, utensils and articles brought into use for farming qualify. Small tools and low value items may be written off in full under the small item practice rather than capitalised. Second hand implements qualify on what you paid, and if you bought from a non vendor there may also be a notional VAT input if you are registered for VAT.

Where people go wrong

Capitalising every hand tool and spanner instead of expensing genuinely small items, which creates an asset register nobody maintains and understates the current year deduction.

Does buying it save you tax?

Buy the implement for the job. The write off is fast, which helps cash flow, but it is not free money.

Authority s12B governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Notional input tax on second hand goods Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Irrigation system and centre pivot

Capital allowance

Irrigation equipment on a farm is claimable, but which regime applies depends on whether the item is fixed development work or movable farming machinery.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Buried mainlines, canals and permanent water reticulation tend to be First Schedule capital development expenditure. A centre pivot, pump station, filters and drip lines are machinery and implements used in farming and fall under the accelerated farming asset allowance. The two regimes have different limits: the development expenditure claim is rationed against farming income, the machinery allowance generally is not.

Where people go wrong

Claiming the whole pivot project under the development expenditure heading can push you into the annual cap unnecessarily when part of it would have been fully claimable as machinery. Split the quote into civils and equipment.

Does buying it save you tax?

Irrigation usually pays for itself in yield, not in tax. The tax treatment is favourable either way, so the decision should be an agronomic one.

Authority s12B and First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure may unlock Wear and tear on business assets Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Livestock purchased during the year

Deductible

Livestock bought is claimed as a purchase in the farming account, but the First Schedule limits the deduction so that livestock purchases cannot manufacture a farming loss.

You can claim this · Farmer

Livestock is trading stock in a farming business. Purchases are deducted, opening stock is added and closing stock is brought in at standard values or, in some cases, market value. A specific limitation restricts the livestock purchase deduction by reference to farming income, with the disallowed portion carried forward to the next year. Breeding stock is treated as livestock, not as plant.

Where people go wrong

Buying a large herd late in the tax year expecting a full deduction. The limitation exists precisely to stop that, and the disallowed part rolls forward. The other trap is treating expensive breeding bulls or stud animals as depreciable equipment.

Does buying it save you tax?

Buying stock to reduce tax largely does not work in South Africa because of the limitation, and you end up with animals to feed. Buy stock for the herd plan.

Authority First Schedule governed by Livestock and produce on hand at standard values Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Livestock standard values

Depends

Livestock on hand is valued at fixed standard values set by regulation rather than at what the animals are actually worth, which is what makes the farming tax result look odd.

The answer turns on the facts · Farmer

The First Schedule requires livestock held at year end to be brought into income at standard values published for each class of animal, unless a higher value has been adopted. Because the standard values are low relative to market prices, a growing herd shows far less taxable income than the economic gain, and a shrinking herd shows more. You may elect a higher value, but once adopted you generally cannot simply drop back down.

Where people go wrong

Electing higher values in a good year without understanding that you are largely stuck with the election. The other trap is inconsistent classification between years, moving animals between classes to smooth the result, which is exactly what a reviewer looks for.

Does buying it save you tax?

This is not a spending decision, it is a valuation regime. Understanding it is what lets you see whether your farming profit is real or just a stock movement.

Authority First Schedule governed by Livestock and produce on hand at standard values Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Packhouse, pack shed and cold room

Depends

The packhouse shell is usually farm development expenditure, but a packing and grading line may cross into manufacturing, which has its own faster allowance.

The answer turns on the facts · Farmer

The building itself, erected for the farming operation, sits in the First Schedule. The equipment inside is either farming machinery or, where the process is a manufacturing or similar process, may qualify under the manufacturing plant allowance. Where packing has become a business in its own right, packing third party fruit for a fee, that income may not be farming income at all, which changes the cap on your development expenditure.

Where people go wrong

Farmers who pack for neighbours treat the whole operation as farming. Splitting farming income from packing service income matters, because the development expenditure cap is measured against farming income specifically.

Does buying it save you tax?

A packhouse is a margin decision. Get the classification right before you build, because it changes both the allowance and the VAT position.

governed by Capital development expenditure may unlock Wear and tear on business assets Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Pesticides, herbicides and crop chemicals

Deductible

Crop chemicals are deductible running costs of the farming operation.

You can claim this · Farmer

Herbicides, insecticides and fungicides applied to a crop are inputs. Aerial spraying contractor fees are also deductible. Chemicals on hand at year end form part of stock.

Where people go wrong

Same year end prepayment trap as fertiliser: a big chemical order bought in March for next season is stock, not a deduction.

Does buying it save you tax?

Ordinary cost of growing a crop. Claim it in the right year.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Plantation and timber growing costs

Depends

Plantation farming has its own rules in the First Schedule, separate from ordinary crop farming, and the treatment of planting, tending and felled timber needs to be read specifically.

The answer turns on the facts · Farmer

Forestry is dealt with by dedicated provisions covering plantation establishment and maintenance expenditure and the value of standing or felled timber, which do not simply mirror the general capital development paragraph. The answer for a specific spend turns on whether it is establishment, tending, or harvesting, and on how the standing timber is valued at year end. Do not apply orchard logic to a plantation without checking.

Where people go wrong

Assuming plantation costs work like a vineyard. They do not, and the difference shows up in the year of felling when the timber value comes into account.

Does buying it save you tax?

Forestry is a long cycle business with a matching long tax cycle. Get the plantation paragraphs applied properly by someone who has done it before, because the timing differences are large.

governed by Capital development expenditure may unlock Livestock and produce on hand at standard values Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Planting trees and establishing an orchard or vineyard

Capital allowance

The cost of establishing an orchard or vineyard, including the young trees or vines, is treated as farm capital development expenditure rather than being locked up until you sell the farm.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

The First Schedule development list includes the planting of trees, shrubs and perennial plants grown for fruit, nuts and similar produce, and the establishment of the area planted. Trellising, supports and irrigation within the block may fall under either development expenditure or farming machinery depending on what it is, so itemise the establishment budget. The annual cap against farming income matters a lot here, because establishment is front loaded and income only arrives years later.

Where people go wrong

This is the classic carry forward case. A new orchard has heavy establishment cost and no crop for several years, so most of the claim is deferred. People budget as if they get the full deduction in year one and are surprised by their provisional tax.

Does buying it save you tax?

The regime is genuinely favourable, but the cash benefit lands years after the cash goes out. Plan the establishment on the agronomics and the finance, not on the tax deduction.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Seed and planting material

Deductible

Seed for an annual crop is a fully deductible input cost in the year it is incurred.

You can claim this · Farmer

Annual crop seed is a running cost. Young trees, vines and perennial planting material are different: those are part of establishing an orchard or vineyard and go into the First Schedule capital development basket instead. Seed on hand at year end is produce and forms part of closing stock.

Where people go wrong

Treating nursery trees or vines like seed. Establishing a perennial block is development expenditure, which is rationed against farming income, and getting that wrong overstates the current year deduction significantly.

Does buying it save you tax?

Core input cost. Nothing clever to do here beyond claiming it correctly.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Smallholding with a few animals: hobby or a real farming trade

Depends

Farming losses only help you if you are genuinely carrying on farming as a trade with a real prospect of profit, and a smallholding that never makes money will usually have its losses ring fenced.

The answer turns on the facts · Anyone

There are two separate hurdles. First, are you trading at all? A few chickens, two cows and a vegetable patch for the household is a hobby, and hobby expenses are not deductible against anything. Second, even if you are trading, farming is a listed suspect trade under the ring fencing rules, so if you are a high income taxpayer and the farming operation makes losses repeatedly, the loss can be ring fenced and set only against future farming income, not against your salary. Scale, business plan, records, marketing, and a realistic route to profit are what distinguish the two.

Where people go wrong

The big one is believing that buying a smallholding creates a deduction against your salary. People buy land, plant a few trees, run a loss for years and then discover the losses are ring fenced and have never reduced their PAYE at all. The ring fencing rules also look at how many of the last several years were loss making, so the problem compounds quietly before anyone notices.

Does buying it save you tax?

Honestly: for most people, no. If you want a plot, buy it because you want to live there. Do not buy it expecting a tax deduction, because the two rules above are specifically designed to stop exactly that. If you do intend to farm commercially, build the business case and the records from day one, because that evidence is what decides the question later.

Authority s20A excluded by Ring fencing of an assessed loss from a suspect trade governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Assessed loss carried forward Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Soil erosion works and contour banks

Capital allowance

Works to prevent soil erosion, including contour banks and stormwater control on the lands, are listed First Schedule capital development expenditure.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Soil conservation works are one of the categories the First Schedule specifically encourages. Ordinary maintenance of existing contours each season is more naturally a running cost and is deductible in full, which is usually the better answer where it applies.

Where people go wrong

Treating annual contour maintenance as development expenditure pushes it into the capped basket when it could have been deducted in full as a running farming cost.

Does buying it save you tax?

Losing topsoil costs more than the tax. Do it for the soil, and take the deduction as a bonus.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure may unlock Repairs to business property Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Solar pumping system on the farm

Capital allowance

Solar panels and inverters that run farm pumps are business assets with an accelerated write off, and there are two possible regimes so the better one should be chosen deliberately.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

A solar installation used in the farming operation can fall under the farming machinery allowance or the renewable energy allowance for business, both of which are faster than ordinary wear and tear. Mounting structures, cabling and the inverter usually go with the panels. The residential solar rebate for individuals is a different thing entirely and does not apply to farm production assets.

Where people go wrong

Claiming a system that mainly powers the farmhouse as a farming asset. If the array runs the house and the pump, apportion. Farmers also try to claim the individual solar rebate as well as the business allowance on the same panels.

Does buying it save you tax?

This is one of the genuinely strong ones. Accelerated relief plus a real reduction in diesel and Eskom cost. Still, buy the system you need for the pumping load, not the biggest one your accountant can write off.

Authority s12B excluded by Solar panel rebate for individuals governed by Renewable energy allowance for business Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Statutory agricultural levies and industry body fees

Deductible

Statutory commodity levies and industry body subscriptions paid by a farmer are deductible as costs of carrying on the farming trade.

You can claim this · Farmer

Levies deducted off your delivery statement by a commodity organisation, and subscriptions to producer organisations and farmers unions, are trade expenditure. Political donations and non trade contributions are not.

Where people go wrong

Levies are usually deducted at source off the settlement statement, so farmers record only the net receipt and lose the deduction. Record gross income and the levy separately.

Does buying it save you tax?

Small amounts individually, but they are deducted automatically all year and add up. Read the settlement statements.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Tractor bought for the farm

Capital allowance

A tractor used in farming is written off over a short accelerated period, much faster than ordinary business plant.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Machinery, implements, utensils and articles brought into use by a farmer for farming purposes get an accelerated write off. If you buy on instalment sale, you claim the allowance on the cost of the tractor and the finance charges separately as interest, not the monthly instalment. When you trade it in or sell it, a recoupment of the allowances claimed comes back into income.

Where people go wrong

Two big ones. Claiming the instalment as if it were a running cost, which double counts. And forgetting the recoupment on trade in, which is why a farmer who upgrades every three years can get a nasty assessment in a year when cash is tight.

Does buying it save you tax?

Buying a tractor to save tax is the single most common bad decision in farming. You spend a rand to save your marginal rate, and you carry the debt. Buy it when the work needs it.

Authority s12B governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Recoupment when an asset is sold Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Veterinary costs and animal medicines

Deductible

Vet fees and medicines for production animals are fully deductible farming expenses.

You can claim this · Farmer

Vaccinations, dosing, antibiotics, calving and lambing assistance, and the vet's call out fee all qualify. Medicines on hand at year end are stock in principle, though small quantities are usually not material. Costs for pets, riding horses and household animals are private.

Where people go wrong

The farm vet also treats the family dogs and the children's ponies on the same account. Ask the vet to bill separately, because a single account with private items on it invites a full disallowance.

Does buying it save you tax?

Animal health is production. Deduct it, and never skip treatment because of the tax.

Authority s11(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Water furrows, canals and reticulation on the farm

Capital allowance

Furrows, canals and the works that carry water to the lands are named in the First Schedule development list and are claimable against farming income.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

This includes the works that lead water from the source to where it is used in the farming operation. As with all First Schedule development expenditure, the deduction in any one year is limited by reference to your farming taxable income, and the balance carries forward indefinitely against future farming income.

Where people go wrong

Farmers with a bad year assume the unclaimed portion is lost and simply do not record it. Track the carried forward balance every year, because it is real money and it only survives if it is on the return.

Does buying it save you tax?

Necessary infrastructure. The value of the tax treatment is that it exists at all, since a non-farming business gets nothing for the same work.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Weir built in a river or stream on the farm

Capital allowance

A weir built to hold or divert water for farming falls in the same First Schedule capital development basket as a dam.

A specific capital write-off applies · Farmer

Weirs sit alongside dams and water furrows in the First Schedule development list. Practically, the water use licence and environmental authorisation costs that go with a weir are a separate question and are more likely an ordinary deduction or capital, depending on what they secure.

Where people go wrong

Building a weir without a water use licence can cost you the structure and the deduction argument at the same time. Also, professional fees for the licence application are often lumped into the construction claim without thought.

Does buying it save you tax?

Only build it if the farm needs the water. The deduction follows the farming need, it does not justify it.

Authority First Schedule para 12 governed by Capital development expenditure Farming
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Why so many of these say no

Because that is the truth, and a catalogue that never says no is a brochure. Most spending does not become cheaper because it is deductible: a deduction reduces your taxable income, so you get back your marginal rate, not the price. The money in a tax return is almost never in buying more things. It is in the claims you already qualify for and never made, and in being able to prove them.

Check what your own records support