Accountant's fee for preparing business financial statements
Deductible
Accounting fees for your business books and annual financial statements are fully deductible.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
This is an ordinary running cost of carrying on a trade. It covers the annual financial statements, management accounts, payroll processing and the business tax computation. Where the accountant also prepares your personal return, that portion is a private cost and should be split out.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the whole invoice where it includes personal work, estate planning or the family trust. Ask for the invoice to be split by matter, because a single line saying professional services invites the whole amount to be queried.
Does buying it save you tax?
Yes, and it is one of the few costs that usually pays for itself by catching deductions you would have missed. Still a real cash cost, so you get back your marginal rate, not the fee.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Antenuptial contract (ANC)
Not deductible
An antenuptial contract is a personal expense with no deduction, but it changes how your income and assets are taxed for the rest of the marriage.
There is no relief for this · Anyone
The notary's fee is private. The consequence is not. Married in community of property means certain income, notably interest and rental, is split fifty fifty between the spouses for tax, and capital gains follow the joint estate. Out of community with or without accrual keeps each spouse taxed on their own income and assets.
Where people go wrong
Not telling your tax practitioner the marital regime, or getting it wrong on the return. Community of property returns that report all the interest on one spouse are a common and easily detected error, and it usually costs the couple money because two interest exemptions are available.
Does buying it save you tax?
No deduction. The tax outcome should be a small part of a much bigger decision, but the income splitting effect of community of property is worth understanding before you sign anything.
Authority s7(2A)
governed by Married in community of property splits income
may unlock Interest in a joint or spousal account
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Attorney drawing up a customer or supplier contract
Deductible
If the contract is part of how you earn your ordinary trading income, the attorney's fee is a normal deductible business cost.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The test is what the contract is FOR. A standard supply or customer agreement that keeps your existing trade running is revenue expenditure and comes off in the year you incur it. A contract that creates a new income producing structure, buys a business, or brings a lasting asset into existence is capital, and the same attorney's bill is then not deductible. Split the invoice if the attorney did both.
Where people go wrong
People assume every attorney invoice is deductible because it says the business name on it. SARS looks at what the legal work achieved, not who paid it. A one off agreement that locks in a brand new revenue stream for many years can be argued as capital, and the whole claim falls over.
Does buying it save you tax?
You are paying an attorney because you need the contract, not because of tax. The deduction gives you back your marginal rate, so a R15,000 drafting fee costs you real money either way. Getting the contract right is worth far more than the tax.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Audit fee
Deductible
Audit and independent review fees are a normal deductible business expense.
You can claim this · Company
Whether you need an audit at all depends on your public interest score and your MOI, and many small companies qualify for an independent review or no assurance engagement instead, which is far cheaper. Whichever applies, the fee is deductible. Fees for special purpose work such as a due diligence on an acquisition follow the underlying transaction and may be capital.
Where people go wrong
Paying for a full audit when your public interest score does not require one. Companies carry this cost for years out of habit, and it is a large deductible expense that many small businesses simply do not need.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible, but check whether you legally need an audit before you accept the quote. Downgrading to an independent review is often the single biggest professional fee saving available to a small company.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
B-BBEE verification certificate
Deductible
B-BBEE verification and consulting fees are deductible as a cost of being able to win work.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Verification fees, the consultant who prepares you for it, and the annual recertification are all incurred to maintain your ability to earn income from customers who require a certificate, so they are revenue and deductible. Note that many small businesses qualifying as exempt micro enterprises need only a sworn affidavit, which costs nothing but the commissioner of oaths.
Where people go wrong
Paying a verification agency thousands of rand when your turnover qualifies you for a free sworn affidavit instead. The fee is deductible, but it is a deduction on money you did not need to spend.
Does buying it save you tax?
Check your turnover band first. If you are an exempt micro enterprise, the affidavit route is free and legally sufficient, which beats any deduction.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Bookkeeper
Deductible
Bookkeeping fees are fully deductible whether the bookkeeper is a contractor or an employee.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
If the bookkeeper is a contractor you deduct the fee. If they are an employee you deduct the salary and the associated employer costs, and you have PAYE, UIF and SDL obligations. Accounting software subscriptions are deductible on the same basis.
Where people go wrong
Paying a regular monthly amount to a person who works only for you, on your premises, under your direction, and treating them as an independent contractor. SARS may treat them as an employee, which means PAYE that should have been withheld, plus penalties and interest on the employer.
Does buying it save you tax?
Yes. Good bookkeeping is what makes every other deduction in this catalogue claimable. Without records, none of it survives a verification.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Record retention obligation
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Breach of contract settlement paid out
Depends
A settlement paid is deductible if the risk of that claim is an inseparable part of how you trade, and not deductible if it is not.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The test is whether the liability arose from the ordinary operations of your trade and is a risk inseparably connected with carrying it on. A builder settling a defective workmanship claim is close to the line and often deductible. A settlement that is really the price of acquiring or protecting a capital asset, or that arises from something outside your trade, is not. Fines and penalties imposed for unlawful conduct are separately and specifically blocked.
Where people go wrong
Treating a settlement as automatically deductible because you had no choice but to pay it. Compulsion is not the test. The test is the connection to your income producing operations, and a payment to make a capital problem go away stays capital.
Does buying it save you tax?
There is no upside here. Even where deductible you get back only your marginal rate on money you would much rather have kept.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Business or trading licence from the municipality
Deductible
An annual business or trading licence fee is a deductible cost of being allowed to trade.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Recurring licence and permit fees paid to keep trading are revenue and deductible in the year incurred. A once off application fee for an initial licence that gives you a lasting right can be argued as capital, though for ordinary municipal trading licences the amounts are usually small enough that it is not worth arguing about.
Where people go wrong
Fines for trading without a licence are not deductible, and paying the fine does not retrospectively make the year's operation compliant. Keep the licence current.
Does buying it save you tax?
Small and deductible. Not a tax decision, it is a legal requirement.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
CCMA or Labour Court matter defended by the employer
Deductible
Costs of defending a CCMA or Labour Court matter arising from your own staff are deductible as an ordinary cost of employing people.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Employment disputes are a risk inseparable from carrying on a trade that has employees, so both the legal or consultant fees and any compensation award ordered are generally deductible. An award of compensation for unfair dismissal is different in character from a fine, so the fines prohibition does not usually bite, but check how the award is described.
Where people go wrong
Employers forget to claim the labour consultant retainer they pay monthly whether or not there is a case. It is deductible in every year, not only in the years you end up at the CCMA.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible, but the cheapest CCMA case is the one you avoid with a proper contract and a documented disciplinary process. Spend there first.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
CIPC annual return fee
Deductible
The CIPC annual return fee is a small deductible cost of keeping the company in existence.
You can claim this · Company
It is an ongoing statutory compliance cost of carrying on the trade, not a cost of acquiring anything, so it is revenue and deductible in the year incurred. Penalties for late filing are a different matter and are unlikely to be deductible.
Where people go wrong
Missing it entirely. CIPC deregisters companies for repeated non filing, and a deregistered company cannot legally trade, open accounts or get a tax clearance. Reinstatement is slow and expensive, and the reinstatement cost is far less clearly deductible than the annual return itself.
Does buying it save you tax?
Trivial cost, deductible, and non negotiable. Diarise it.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Company registration and incorporation costs
Not deductible
The cost of registering the company is a capital cost of bringing the business into existence and is not deductible.
There is no relief for this · Company
You cannot deduct the cost of creating the income producing structure itself, only the costs of running it once it exists. Pre trade expenditure has its own rules and may be carried forward and allowed when the trade starts, but formation and incorporation costs are capital in nature and do not get in that way.
Where people go wrong
The wider trap is claiming everything spent before the business opened its doors. Pre trade expenses are held over and allowed against income from that trade once it commences, not deducted against your salary in the year you spent the money.
Does buying it save you tax?
No deduction, and the registration fee itself is small. Do not pay an agent a large premium for something CIPC charges very little for.
Authority s11A
excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Provisional tax as a new business owner
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Company secretarial fees
Deductible
Ongoing company secretarial fees are deductible as a cost of keeping the company compliant.
You can claim this · Company
Routine work such as maintaining the statutory registers, filing director and address changes and preparing resolutions is revenue and deductible. Work on share issues, restructures, conversions or an MOI amendment tied to a capital transaction follows the capital transaction instead.
Where people go wrong
Lumping the once off restructure fee in with the monthly retainer. The retainer is deductible, the restructure work usually is not, and one invoice covering both will be treated as the least favourable of the two if it is queried.
Does buying it save you tax?
Modest and deductible. Deregistration for unfiled annual returns costs far more to reverse than the retainer.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Copyright registration
Not deductible
South Africa has no general copyright register, so there is usually no fee to claim: copyright arises automatically when the work is created.
There is no relief for this · Anyone
Copyright in most works exists the moment the work is created and fixed in material form, with no registration required. The one recognised registration in South Africa is for cinematograph films. So for the vast majority of people, the honest answer is that there is nothing to deduct because there is nothing to pay. Where you do incur costs to acquire an existing copyright for use in your trade, the acquired intellectual property allowance may apply.
Where people go wrong
Paying an overseas or online service to register your South African copyright. These services sell you a dated record of existence, not a legal registration, and they are widely oversold. The deduction question is a distraction from the fact that the product is largely unnecessary.
Does buying it save you tax?
No. Do not buy copyright registration for South African works. Save the money and keep dated originals of your work instead.
excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Damages or a settlement received
Depends
What you received is taxed according to what it replaced: lost profits are income, damage to a capital asset or reputation is capital.
The answer turns on the facts · Anyone
This is the fill the hole principle. If the payment compensates you for income you would otherwise have earned, such as lost trading profits or unpaid fees, it is gross income and fully taxable. If it compensates you for the loss or impairment of a capital asset, it is a capital receipt and goes into the CGT calculation instead, potentially with a rollover if it was an involuntary disposal. Personal injury and defamation awards to an individual are generally treated very differently again.
Where people go wrong
Not declaring it at all because the money came from a court and felt like a windfall. SARS sees the attorney's trust account payment. Declaring it in the wrong box is fixable, not declaring it is an understatement penalty.
Does buying it save you tax?
Not applicable, this is income to be reported rather than something you buy. Get the settlement agreement to state clearly what each portion is for, before you sign it, because that wording drives the tax.
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Involuntary disposal rollover
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Damages paid after losing a court case
Depends
Damages paid are deductible only where the wrong arose out of your ordinary trading operations, never where they are a fine or arise outside the trade.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Damages for a trading mishap, for example a delivery vehicle causing damage while on a business run, are generally closer to deductible. Damages arising from conduct that is not part of the trade, or that relate to a capital asset, are not. Any element that is a fine, penalty or payment for unlawful activity is expressly disallowed regardless of how it is described.
Where people go wrong
Splitting is where people lose. A single court order often mixes damages, interest, costs and a penalty component. Interest and party and party costs may be treated differently to the damages themselves, and the penalty element is dead. Get the order itemised.
Does buying it save you tax?
No. Nothing about paying damages is a tax play. Make sure your public liability cover is adequate instead.
Authority s23(o)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Debt collection agency commission
Deductible
Commission you pay a debt collector to recover trade debts is a deductible business expense.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
It is incurred in the production of income from your existing trade and is revenue in nature. Claim the commission actually incurred, and remember that the commission is calculated on the gross recovered amount even though you only bank the net. Where the collector deducts commission before paying you over, your income is the gross figure and the commission is the expense.
Where people go wrong
Only recording the net amount received. That understates both income and expenses, and it means when SARS reconciles your bank to your turnover the numbers will not tie. It also quietly loses you the deduction for the commission.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible, but a collector taking a large percentage of an old debt is often worse value than a settlement discount offered directly. Compare before handing over.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Bad and doubtful debts
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Domain name registration and renewal
Depends
Annual domain renewals are a small deductible running cost, but paying a large premium to buy an existing domain from someone is capital.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
A normal registration or renewal of a domain, together with hosting, is a recurring operating cost and comes off in the year. Buying a valuable existing domain from a third party for a substantial sum is acquiring an asset with lasting value, which is capital and goes to base cost rather than being deducted. The size of the payment and whether it is recurring are the practical indicators.
Where people go wrong
Letting the renewal lapse is the real world trap. Losing a domain someone else immediately registers can cost far more to recover than any tax at stake. Set the domain to auto renew and keep the registrar contact email current.
Does buying it save you tax?
Renewals are small and deductible. A premium domain purchase should be justified commercially, because there is no annual write off waiting for you.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Drafting a will
Not deductible
The cost of having a will drawn up is personal estate planning and is not deductible.
There is no relief for this · Anyone
It produces no income and has no trade connection. Many banks and trust companies draft the will free on condition they are nominated as executor, which is not free at all, it is prepaid out of the executor's fee your estate will pay later.
Where people go wrong
Accepting a free will in exchange for nominating a corporate executor without negotiating the executor's fee percentage in writing. The default fee is a maximum set by regulation, not a fixed price, and it is negotiable while you are alive and nearly impossible to change afterwards.
Does buying it save you tax?
No tax relief, and still one of the highest value few thousand rand you will ever spend. Dying without a will is expensive for the people you leave behind.
Authority s23(a)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
may unlock Estate duty abatement and portability
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Employment contract drafted by an attorney or labour consultant
Deductible
Getting employment contracts drawn up is an ordinary running cost of employing people and is deductible.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
This sits squarely on the revenue side. You are not acquiring anything lasting, you are managing the workforce that produces your income. The same applies to a set of template employment contracts drafted once and reused, and to updating them when labour law changes.
Where people go wrong
Employers sometimes bundle the employment contract fee into a bigger restructuring or sale of business invoice from the same attorney. The employment portion is deductible, the sale of business portion is not. Ask the attorney for a split invoice at the time, not two years later when SARS queries it.
Does buying it save you tax?
Yes as far as it goes, but the real value is that a proper contract keeps you out of the CCMA. The tax saving is your marginal rate on a modest fee.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Executor's fees and the cost of winding up an estate
Not deductible
Estate administration costs are not an income tax deduction for the heirs, though they do reduce the estate for estate duty purposes.
There is no relief for this · Anyone
Two different taxes are at work. Executor's remuneration, Master's fees and advertising costs are administration expenses that come off the estate before estate duty is calculated. They are not deductible on the deceased's final income tax return or on any beneficiary's return. What the heirs inherit is not taxable income in their hands.
Where people go wrong
Beneficiaries trying to claim a share of the executor's fee on their own returns, or assuming the inheritance itself must be declared as income. Neither is right. Only income the estate earns after death, and income distributed to beneficiaries, gets reported.
Does buying it save you tax?
Not a purchase decision, but the executor's fee percentage is negotiable before death and almost never afterwards. That conversation is worth having.
governed by An inheritance is not taxable income
governed by Final and post death returns
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Goodwill purchased when buying a business
Base cost only
Goodwill you pay for when buying a business gets no deduction and no annual write off: it sits in base cost until you sell.
No deduction now, it reduces tax when you sell · Anyone
Goodwill is a capital asset. There is no wear and tear allowance for it and it is not on the list of intellectual property that qualifies for an acquisition allowance. Accounting amortisation of goodwill is added back in the tax computation. The relief comes only on disposal, when the purchase price forms part of base cost and reduces the capital gain.
Where people go wrong
Assuming that because the accountant amortises goodwill in the financial statements, the amortisation is deductible. It is not, and every year of amortisation must be added back. If nobody adds it back, the error compounds across years.
Does buying it save you tax?
No current relief. When you negotiate a business purchase, the allocation between goodwill, stock, equipment and a restraint matters a lot for tax, and it is worth taking advice on the split before signing rather than after.
Authority para 20 of the Eighth Schedule
excluded by Wear and tear on business assets
governed by Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Having a contract reviewed by an attorney before signing
Depends
Review fees follow whatever the contract itself is: reviewing a supply agreement is deductible, reviewing the purchase of a business or a property is not.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
This is the clearest place to see the capital versus revenue split. Same attorney, same hourly rate, completely different answer depending on the document on the desk. Reviewing your standard customer terms protects existing income and is deductible. Reviewing the agreement under which you buy premises, buy a business, or acquire shares is a cost of acquiring an asset and goes to base cost.
Where people go wrong
Booking all review fees to one professional fees account so the deductible and the capital work becomes impossible to separate at year end. Narrate each attorney invoice with the matter it relates to when you capture it.
Does buying it save you tax?
The tax outcome should not drive whether you get a contract reviewed. The cost of an unreviewed bad contract dwarfs the deduction.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Health and safety or food safety certificate
Deductible
Health, safety and food certificates and the inspections behind them are deductible operating costs.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Certificates of acceptability, environmental health inspections, occupational health and safety compliance work and fire clearance are all ongoing costs of being legally permitted to trade and are deductible. Where compliance requires you to physically alter the premises, for example installing a new extraction system or a wash up area, that is capital expenditure on an asset and follows the wear and tear or building allowance rules instead.
Where people go wrong
Treating a compliance driven building alteration as a repair because it was forced on you by an inspector. Compulsion does not make it a repair. If it improves the property or creates a new asset, it is capital.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible and legally required. The compliance work itself is what protects you from a closure notice, which costs far more than the fee.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Repairs to business property
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Industry certification or accreditation for the business
Depends
Ongoing certification and surveillance fees are deductible, but a large once off accreditation that opens a genuinely new market can be capital.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Annual surveillance audits, recertification and the consultant who keeps your system current are revenue costs of maintaining the business you already have. A substantial first time accreditation that is a precondition for entering an entirely new market, and that gives an enduring benefit, is more exposed to a capital argument. In practice the amounts and the facts decide it.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the consultant's implementation project, which can run to a large sum over a year or two, in the same account as the small annual fee. If SARS looks, the implementation project is the part that gets challenged, and having it visibly separate makes the annual fee easy to defend.
Does buying it save you tax?
Certification is a commercial decision about winning work. Where deductible you recover your marginal rate, which never justifies a certification you do not need.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Initial franchise fee paid to buy into a franchise
Not deductible
The upfront fee to join a franchise buys a lasting right to trade under the brand, which is capital and not deductible.
There is no relief for this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The initial fee gives you an enduring benefit, the right to operate the franchise for the term of the agreement, so it is capital in nature. It goes to the base cost of what you acquired, giving relief only when you eventually sell or exit. This is the opposite of the ongoing royalty, which is fully deductible.
Where people go wrong
Deducting the whole initial fee in the first year, which is exactly when the business can least afford the assessment that follows. The initial fee and the ongoing royalty land in the same bank account of the same franchisor, and people treat them the same way. They are not the same.
Does buying it save you tax?
No immediate relief, and this is worth knowing before you sign, because franchisee cash flow projections sometimes assume the fee is deductible. Record it as base cost from day one.
excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Lease agreement drawn up for business premises
Depends
The attorney's fee for a normal business lease is usually deductible, but a lease premium and leasehold improvements follow completely different rules.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Three separate things get confused here. The legal fee for drafting or registering the lease is normally revenue and deductible where the lease is for ordinary trading premises. A lease premium (a lump sum paid on top of rent to get the lease) has its own allowance regime spread over the lease period. Improvements you are obliged to make to the leased property are handled under the leasehold improvement rules, not as a repair. If it is a long lease that must be notarially registered, the registration cost is more likely to be capital.
Where people go wrong
Deducting the whole lump sum you paid the landlord to get the lease as if it were rent. A premium is not rent, it is spread, and the spreading period is set by the lease terms. Claiming it all in year one is a straight understatement.
Does buying it save you tax?
Neutral. You need premises, and the tax treatment of the legal fee is small change next to the rent itself. Just make sure the premium is spread correctly rather than over claimed.
Authority s11(f)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Lease premiums and leasehold improvements
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Legal fees defending a claim brought against the business
Depends
Defending a claim that comes out of your ordinary trading is deductible, defending your title to an asset is capital and is not.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The specific legal expenses provision covers claims, disputes and actions at law arising in the course of the ordinary operations of the trade, and excludes expenditure of a capital nature. Defending a customer's complaint about the work you did is revenue. Defending your ownership of a property, a trademark you own, or your shares is protecting a capital asset, and those costs go to the base cost of that asset rather than into your deductions.
Where people go wrong
The single most common error in this whole area: claiming litigation costs incurred to defend title to an asset. It feels like an unavoidable business cost, but it is capital, and if you do not push it into base cost it disappears entirely.
Does buying it save you tax?
Where deductible, yes, but the deduction returns only your marginal rate. This is the strongest argument for having proper professional indemnity or public liability cover, which pays the whole bill.
Authority s11(c)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Legal fees on a divorce
Not deductible
Divorce legal fees are personal and are not deductible, no matter how much of the fight is about business assets.
There is no relief for this · Anyone
There is no trade connection, so the general deduction fails at the first hurdle and the private expenditure prohibition closes the door. Where the divorce order divides a pension interest, that has its own tax rules on the fund side, and where assets transfer between spouses the capital gains rollover may apply, but neither of those makes the attorney's fee deductible.
Where people go wrong
Running divorce fees through the business because the business is part of the dispute. That is not a deduction, and in a company it can become a taxable benefit or a loan account issue on top. It also puts your whole professional fees account under the spotlight.
Does buying it save you tax?
No relief at all. Budget for the fee gross.
Authority s23(a)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
may unlock Transfer between spouses rolls over
may unlock Pension split by a divorce order
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Legal fees on a personal matter
Not deductible
Legal fees on a private matter are not deductible, and a salaried employee has almost no scope to claim legal costs at all.
There is no relief for this · Salaried employee
Private and domestic expenditure is expressly excluded. Salaried employees are separately restricted from deducting ordinary work related costs, with only a short list of exceptions. Even a work adjacent dispute is difficult for an employee to claim, and a purely personal one is impossible.
Where people go wrong
Believing that because the dispute affected your ability to work, it becomes work related. The connection has to be to the production of income in a trade, and employment does not open the door the way self employment does.
Does buying it save you tax?
No deduction. If you want cover, a legal expenses insurance policy is the practical answer, though the premium on a private policy is not deductible either.
Authority s23(a)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Legal fees on a sale of business agreement
Base cost only
Legal fees on buying or selling a business are not a deduction, they go into base cost and reduce your capital gain instead.
No deduction now, it reduces tax when you sell · Anyone
Costs directly related to acquiring or disposing of an asset form part of base cost, which includes attorney fees, valuation fees and agent commission on the transaction. On a sale they reduce the proceeds side of the gain. On a purchase they increase what you paid. Either way the relief comes through capital gains tax, not through your income tax deduction.
Where people go wrong
Throwing the attorney's disposal invoice into professional fees in the year of sale, getting the deduction disallowed, and then never going back to add it to base cost. You lose it twice. Keep the invoice with the sale file, not with the year's expenses.
Does buying it save you tax?
It does reduce tax, but only through the capital gain, at the inclusion rate, in the year of disposal. Do not treat it as a same year deduction when planning cash flow.
Authority para 20 of the Eighth Schedule
governed by Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
may unlock Small business asset exclusion at 55 and over
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Legal fees to renegotiate an existing contract
Deductible
Renegotiating a contract you already have, to protect income you already earn, is normally deductible.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Protecting or preserving an existing income stream is revenue in nature. Renegotiating a supplier price, extending a customer agreement on similar terms, or fixing an unworkable clause all sit here. The answer changes if the renegotiation is really the acquisition of a materially new and enduring right, for example converting a short term arrangement into a long exclusive licence.
Where people go wrong
Assuming the reverse of the real rule. Money spent to PROTECT existing income is usually deductible, money spent to ACQUIRE a new income stream usually is not. People routinely get this backwards and claim the acquisition while missing the protection.
Does buying it save you tax?
Yes. Of all the legal spend in a business, defending and preserving what you already earn is the most reliably deductible category.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Legal fees to sue a customer for unpaid invoices
Deductible
Legal costs to recover money owed to you from your trade are deductible, and there is a specific provision for exactly this.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Legal expenses actually incurred in respect of a claim, dispute or action at law arising in the course of the ordinary operations of your trade have their own deduction, provided the claim is not of a capital nature and the expenditure is not otherwise disallowed. Chasing a trade debtor is the textbook example. If the debt itself becomes irrecoverable, the write off of the debt is a separate claim under the bad debt provision.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the full invoice value as a loss when the customer does not pay, on top of the legal fees. If you are on the normal accrual basis you already included that invoice in income, so the bad debt write off is the correct claim, not a second deduction of the same amount.
Does buying it save you tax?
The legal fee is deductible, but suing for a small debt is usually a bad commercial decision regardless of the tax. Weigh recovery odds first, tax second.
Authority s11(c)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Bad and doubtful debts
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Liquor licence
Depends
The annual renewal is deductible, but the cost of obtaining a new liquor licence for the first time is capital.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
This is the capital versus revenue split in one clean example. The first application, including the attorney's fee, advertising and the liquor board fee, obtains a valuable and enduring right that attaches to the premises and the business, so it is capital and not deductible. The annual renewal fee simply keeps an existing right alive and is revenue. If you buy a business that already holds a licence, the value attributed to the licence forms part of the base cost of what you bought.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the initial application cost, often a substantial attorney bill, as a deduction in the first year of trading. It is one of the more visible capital items on a new hospitality business's income statement and it does not survive a review.
Does buying it save you tax?
The licence is worth real money on resale, which is exactly why it is capital. Track the initial cost as part of your base cost so you get relief when you eventually sell.
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Non disclosure agreement (NDA) drafted
Deductible
An NDA used in the normal course of trading is a small revenue legal cost and is deductible.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
NDAs signed with staff, contractors, suppliers and prospective customers are part of running the business, so the drafting fee comes off in the year incurred. The exception is an NDA signed as part of a sale of business or a capital transaction, where the fee follows that transaction into base cost.
Where people go wrong
An NDA signed as part of a due diligence on selling the business is a disposal cost, not a running cost, even though the document itself looks identical to your standard one.
Does buying it save you tax?
Small cost, small deduction. Worth doing for protection, not for tax.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Ongoing franchise royalty or management fee
Deductible
The ongoing royalty and marketing levy you pay the franchisor are fully deductible operating costs.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Recurring payments based on turnover, for continued use of the brand, systems and marketing, are revenue in nature and deductible in the year incurred. Where the franchisor is a non resident, withholding tax on royalties may apply and you may have a withholding obligation, which is a separate question from your deduction.
Where people go wrong
Paying royalties to a foreign franchisor without withholding the royalty withholding tax. The deduction is safe, but SARS can hold the payer liable for the tax that should have been withheld, plus penalties. Check the double tax agreement rate before you pay.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible, and unavoidable if you are in the franchise. The real question is whether the royalty percentage is worth what the brand delivers, which is a commercial question, not a tax one.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
POPIA compliance work
Deductible
POPIA and PAIA compliance work is a deductible cost of operating lawfully.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
Drafting privacy policies, registering the information officer, preparing the PAIA manual, staff training and the consultant's time are all recurring compliance costs of the trade and deductible. Where compliance requires you to buy software or hardware, that portion is a capital asset written off under the wear and tear rules rather than deducted outright.
Where people go wrong
Ignoring it because no one has complained. Administrative fines under POPIA can be substantial, and fines are not deductible, so you pay them out of after tax money while the compliance work you skipped would have been deductible.
Does buying it save you tax?
Deductible and increasingly expected by corporate customers. For a small business the baseline work is not expensive, and the fine risk is the real driver.
Authority s11(a)
excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Partnership agreement drawn up
Not deductible
Setting up the partnership itself is a capital cost, so the drafting fee is generally not deductible.
There is no relief for this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The agreement creates the structure the trade will be carried on through, rather than producing income within an existing trade. Later amendments that deal with day to day operating matters are more arguable as revenue, but the original formation agreement is capital. Each partner deducts their share of partnership expenses, so even if a portion were deductible it would be split according to the profit sharing ratio.
Where people go wrong
Partners often each claim the full fee on their own return because they each paid a share and each has a copy of the invoice. Partnership expenditure is shared, never duplicated.
Does buying it save you tax?
No deduction, and still worth paying for. Undocumented partnerships are where small businesses go to die.
Authority s23(g)
excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
governed by Losses on a partnership share
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Patent registration or buying a patent
Depends
Filing and renewing your own patent gets a deduction, while buying someone else's patent is written off over time under a separate allowance.
The answer turns on the facts · Company
The costs of obtaining registration, renewal or extension of a patent fall under the intellectual property registration provision and are deductible. If instead you acquire an existing patent for use in your trade, there is a separate annual allowance for acquired intellectual property, at a different rate for patents than for designs and copyright, and it has conditions including a threshold below which the cost may be claimed in full. Research and development spending that generates the invention has its own regime again.
Where people go wrong
Assuming a purchased patent is deductible in full in the year of purchase. It is spread, and there are anti avoidance conditions where the seller is a connected person, which can deny the allowance entirely.
Does buying it save you tax?
Patenting is expensive and only worth it if you will actually enforce it. The deduction does not change that calculation. For most small businesses a registered trademark is the better spend.
Authority s11(gB)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Research and development deduction
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Payment to a debt collector or Payment Distribution Agency where the taxpayer owes the debt
Not deductible
A payment collected by a debt collector or a debt-review Payment Distribution Agency is a repayment of an existing obligation, not a new expense, and cannot be claimed a second time. PLEASE CONFIRM WITH YOUR TAX PRACTITIONER: this item is matched to an existing rule by general principle, not a SARS ruling written for this exact situation, so check it applies before relying on it.
There is no relief for this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
This is the mirror case of EX-LEG-022 (a business recovering ITS OWN debts from customers): here the taxpayer is themselves under debt review or being pursued for a debt, paying a Payment Distribution Agency such as DC Partner (NCR registration NCRPDA02) or a collections agency such as MBD/Nutun. Whatever the original debt was for was either already incurred (and possibly already claimed) at the time it arose, or was always private. Either way the repayment itself is not a fresh deduction.
Where people go wrong
A statement line from a debt collector or PDA is easy to mistake for a business expense because the amount is often large and regular. The bundled PDA payment may also contain both personal and business creditors in one line, which the bank statement cannot separate, so it must never be allocated by amount alone.
Does buying it save you tax?
Not applicable, this is a not_deductible item. The correct action is to trace the ORIGINAL debt (what was it for, was it already claimed) rather than claim the repayment.
Authority s23(g)
excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Professional body membership or registration fee
Depends
If you trade for your own account the professional body fee is deductible, but a salaried employee generally cannot claim it.
The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer
For a sole proprietor, partner or consultant, registration with the body that licenses you to practise is a direct cost of earning your income and is deductible. For an employee on a payslip the deduction rules are restrictive and this is not on the permitted list, so the practical answer is no. Many employers pay these fees directly for employees, which is usually the cleaner outcome for everyone.
Where people go wrong
Employees claiming their annual council registration under other deductions. It is disallowed, and the far better route is to ask the employer to pay it directly as a business cost, which is deductible for the employer and generally not a taxable benefit where it is required for the job.
Does buying it save you tax?
For the self employed, yes and it is unavoidable anyway. For employees, negotiate for the employer to pay it rather than trying to claim it.
Authority s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Restraint of trade payment made
Deductible
A restraint of trade payment you make is deductible, but spread over the restraint period with a minimum spreading period set by the Act.
You can claim this · Company
There is a specific provision allowing the deduction, and it does not allow the whole amount in year one. The amount is allowed over the number of years of the restraint, subject to a statutory minimum number of years, so a short restraint is still spread. The deduction is generally available only where the payment is taxable in the hands of the recipient.
Where people go wrong
Claiming the full payment in the year you make it. This is a favourite audit adjustment because it is a large round number in an unusual account. Set up the amortisation schedule at the time of payment.
Does buying it save you tax?
You do get relief, just slowly. Factor the spreading into the cash flow when you negotiate the amount.
Authority s11(cA)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Restraint of trade payment received
Not deductible
A restraint of trade payment you receive is fully taxable as income at your marginal rate, not as a capital gain.
There is no relief for this · Anyone
Restraint of trade receipts by natural persons and certain other recipients are specifically included in gross income, so the old argument that they are capital no longer works. It is taxed in full in the year of receipt or accrual, and a large restraint can push you into the top bracket for that year. If it is paid by an employer it should go through the payroll and appear on your IRP5.
Where people go wrong
Structuring a portion of a severance or sale package as restraint of trade in the belief it will be taxed more lightly. It is the worst of the options: fully taxable at marginal rates, with none of the retirement table relief that a genuine severance benefit gets.
Does buying it save you tax?
Not a purchase. If you are negotiating, understand that a rand of restraint is taxed harder than a rand of qualifying severance benefit and much harder than a capital receipt. Get the split advised before signing.
governed by Restraint of trade payment is fully taxable
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Retrenchment or severance settlement paid to an employee
Deductible
Severance and retrenchment payments to staff are generally deductible for the employer, and taxed on the favourable retirement table in the employee's hands.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
For the employer this is a cost of the trade and normally deductible when incurred. For the employee a qualifying severance benefit is taxed on the retirement lump sum table rather than at their marginal rate, which is materially better, and it requires the employer to apply for a tax directive. A payment dressed up as severance that does not meet the definition, for example a normal notice payment or leave pay, is taxed as ordinary remuneration.
Where people go wrong
Paying the package out without applying for a directive, or labelling ordinary notice pay and accrued leave as severance. SARS reassesses the employee, the employee comes back to the employer, and the goodwill the package bought is gone.
Does buying it save you tax?
For the employer the deduction is real but the cash is gone. For the employee, insisting the employer applies for the correct directive is worth far more than negotiating a slightly bigger gross number.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Severance benefit taxed on the retirement table
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Service level agreement (SLA) drafted or reviewed
Deductible
An SLA governing services you supply or buy is an ordinary trading document, so the legal fee is deductible.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
This is revenue expenditure whether you are the service provider tightening your obligations or the customer protecting your uptime. It regulates an ongoing trading relationship rather than acquiring anything lasting.
Where people go wrong
Where the SLA is bundled into a multi year exclusive supply arrangement that effectively buys you a market position, part of the fee starts to look capital. Watch for wording that describes the payment as securing exclusivity rather than as legal drafting.
Does buying it save you tax?
Yes, and marginal. You get your tax rate back on a modest professional fee.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Shareholders agreement drawn up
Not deductible
A shareholders agreement structures the ownership of the company, which is capital, so the legal fee is generally not deductible.
There is no relief for this · Company
The agreement does not produce income. It governs who owns the shares, how they are transferred, how disputes between owners are resolved and what happens on death or exit. That is the capital framework of the business, in the same category as incorporation costs. Where the agreement also contains genuine operating provisions (for example service terms for a working shareholder), that portion may be arguable, but you need the attorney to split it.
Where people go wrong
Assuming that because the company paid it, the company can deduct it. It is also the wrong place to look for CGT relief: the cost usually attaches to the shareholders' shares rather than to anything the company owns, so the company gets nothing at all.
Does buying it save you tax?
No tax benefit, and do not let that put you off. A shareholders agreement is the single cheapest way to avoid a ruinous fight later. Treat the cost as pure business insurance.
Authority s23(g)
excluded by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Tax practitioner's fee for a personal income tax return
Not deductible
If you are a salaried employee, the fee you pay to have your personal tax return submitted is not deductible.
There is no relief for this · Salaried employee
Employees may only deduct a short list of specified items, and the cost of complying with your own tax obligations is not one of them. The position is different for a sole proprietor or a person carrying on a trade, where the portion of the fee relating to the business tax computation is a business cost. Rental owners can likewise claim the portion attributable to the rental trade.
Where people go wrong
Entering the tax practitioner fee under other deductions on the ITR12 as a salaried taxpayer. It gets disallowed, and it flags the return for a wider look at every other deduction on it.
Does buying it save you tax?
No deduction if you are on a payslip only. Pay for the practitioner because they find things and keep you compliant, not because it is claimable.
Authority s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
may unlock Rental running expenses are deductible
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Template contract bought online
Deductible
A contract template bought for business use is a small deductible cost, and you claim it in the year you buy it.
You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer
The amount is normally too small to argue about and it relates to your ordinary trading. Keep the receipt or card statement plus the download confirmation. If the seller is a foreign supplier, note that no South African VAT input tax arises unless the supplier is registered here.
Where people go wrong
Buying a foreign template that does not comply with South African law, especially for employment or consumer contracts, then discovering it is unenforceable. The deduction is real, the contract may not be.
Does buying it save you tax?
Cheap and deductible, but a generic template that does not fit your business is a false economy. For anything that matters, pay the attorney.
Authority s11(a)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Trade union subscription
Not deductible
Trade union subscriptions are not deductible on your personal income tax return.
There is no relief for this · Salaried employee
The deductions available to a salaried employee are a short closed list and union subscriptions are not on it. The amount often appears as a deduction on your payslip, which makes people assume it has already been given tax relief, but a payslip deduction is not the same as a tax deduction: it reduces what you are paid, not what you are taxed on.
Where people go wrong
The payslip confusion is the whole trap. A line item under deductions on a payslip means the money left your pay. Only certain items, such as pension fund contributions, also reduce taxable income, and those are already reflected on your IRP5.
Does buying it save you tax?
No tax relief. Join a union for representation, not for a deduction.
Authority s23(m)
excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.
Trademark registration and renewal
Deductible
The cost of obtaining or renewing the registration of a trademark has its own deduction provision, but buying an existing trademark from someone else does not.
You can claim this · Company
There is a specific provision allowing a deduction for expenditure to obtain the registration, renewal or extension of intellectual property including trademarks, which covers the attorney and filing fees. That is quite different from the price paid to acquire a trademark that already exists: the general allowance for acquired intellectual property specifically excludes trademarks, so a purchased trademark is a capital asset with no annual write off.
Where people go wrong
The gap between registering and buying is where the money is lost. People who pay a large sum for an existing brand expect to write it off and cannot. Registering your own brand from scratch is the treatment that gets relief.
Does buying it save you tax?
Registering your own trademark is cheap, gets a deduction, and is the only way to actually own your brand name. One of the few items here that is genuinely worth doing early.
Authority s11(gB)
governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income
may unlock Base cost includes far more than the purchase price
Legal and professional
Research, not advice.
This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting
point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.