Filing season open067 465 2243Tax Pig ↗
// THE CATALOGUE

YOU BOUGHT A THING.WHAT HAPPENS?

Type what you actually bought or did. Not a section of the Act, the real thing: a borehole, a kettle for the office, a loan to your brother, a contract your attorney drew up.

Every item, grouped by what the law does with it.

Trades and professions · 40 items

Start again

Accountant's SAICA or SAIPA fees, tax practitioner registration and practice software

Deductible

Running your own practice, body membership, tax practitioner registration and accounting software are deducted in full in the year; an employee in a corporate finance role generally cannot claim them.

You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Membership of a recognised controlling body, SARS tax practitioner registration, CPD, practice management and audit software subscriptions, and professional indemnity cover are ordinary running costs of a practice, deductible when incurred. A salaried financial manager who pays SAICA fees personally is caught by s23(m), and this is common because many employers pay only part of the subscription. Where you have a salary and a small practice on the side, apportion the subscription to the practice on a defensible basis and be prepared to explain it.

Where people go wrong

Splitting a single SAICA subscription across a salary and a small side practice with no basis for the split. If the practice is a small fraction of your professional activity, claiming the whole fee against it invites disallowance. Claim a defensible portion or none.

Does buying it save you tax?

For a practice, a straightforward and worthwhile deduction. For an employee, this is the same trap as the nurse and the doctor: compulsory does not mean deductible.

Authority s11(a), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Artist's paint, canvas, framing and studio rent

Depends

Materials and studio rent are deductible against art income, but paint sitting in unsold work is closer to stock than to a spent expense.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Studio rent, electricity for a kiln, framing and delivery to galleries are running costs deductible when incurred. Materials consumed are deductible, but where you hold finished unsold works as stock the cost tied up in them may need to be carried as closing stock rather than deducted immediately. Gallery commission deducted from your sale price is a business expense, and you should declare the gross sale and claim the commission, not just bank the net.

Where people go wrong

Declaring only what the gallery paid out. The gross sale price is your income and the commission is your deduction. Netting them off hides turnover, which matters for provisional tax and for the VAT registration threshold.

Does buying it save you tax?

The studio and framing costs are worth claiming properly. The deeper win for most artists is simply getting registered and declaring correctly, because gallery payment trails are visible.

Authority s11(a), s22 governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Provisional tax as a new business owner Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Attorney's practising certificate, Fidelity Fund certificate and law library

Deductible

In practice for your own account, the practising certificate, Fidelity Fund certificate, chambers rent and legal research subscriptions are deductible; an employed professional assistant generally cannot claim them.

You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer

For a practitioner trading for own account, Legal Practice Council fees, the Fidelity Fund certificate, professional indemnity top-up cover, chambers or office rent, and LexisNexis or Juta subscriptions are all expenditure in the production of income deductible in the year paid. An admitted attorney employed as a professional assistant on a payslip is a salaried employee and s23(m) blocks these costs even though the practising certificate is a legal requirement to do the job. Hard copy law reports that last for years may look like an asset rather than a running cost, whereas an annual online subscription is clearly a running cost.

Where people go wrong

Employed associates claiming the practising certificate and LPC fees. The firm usually pays these anyway; if it does not, negotiate for it to, because a reimbursement is worth the full amount and a disallowed deduction is worth nothing.

Does buying it save you tax?

For a sole practitioner or advocate, yes, these are unavoidable annual costs and among the cleanest deductions available. For an employed associate, no.

Authority s11(a), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Beautician's treatment bed, wax pot and salon consumables

Depends

The bed and machines are equipment written off over time; wax, strips, lash glue and creams are consumables deducted as you use them.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

A treatment bed, facial steamer, laser or IPL machine is equipment recovered through wear and tear over its write-off period, and financing it does not change that: only the interest portion of the instalment is a running deduction, not the whole instalment. Consumables and product used in treatments are deductible when used, with unused stock at year end added back. If you work from a room at home you are into home office territory, which has its own strict requirements about a dedicated, exclusively used space.

Where people go wrong

Deducting the full monthly instalment on a financed IPL machine. Only the finance charge is a running expense; the capital portion is recovered through the wear and tear allowance, and claiming both is a double deduction SARS will pick up.

Does buying it save you tax?

Consumables and the room cost are the real money here. A R150,000 machine bought for the tax break is a bad trade: you recover your marginal rate, spread over years.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s24J, s23(b) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets governed by Interest incurred on business borrowing may unlock Home office for a sole proprietor Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Builder's scaffolding, concrete mixer and power tools

Wear and tear

Scaffolding, a mixer and big power tools are business assets written off over time, not deducted in full the year you buy them.

Written off over time, not all at once · Sole proprietor or freelancer

These are plant and equipment used in your trade, so the cost is recovered through the wear and tear allowance over the write-off period SARS accepts for that class of asset. Items individually costing less than the small item write-off threshold, such as a single grinder or a wheelbarrow, are generally written off in full in the year of acquisition. If your business qualifies as a small business corporation, a faster allowance regime may apply to plant and machinery, which is worth checking before you assume the standard periods.

Where people go wrong

Expecting the full price of a R60,000 scaffolding set to come off this year's profit. It does not: you get a slice each year. The second trap is on the way out, when you sell the scaffolding for more than its written down value and the difference is recouped back into income.

Does buying it save you tax?

Yes if you need the kit, but the relief arrives in instalments. Buying equipment in February to shrink a provisional tax bill mostly does not work, because you only get one year's slice of the allowance.

Authority s11(e), s12E, s8(4)(a) governed by Wear and tear on business assets governed by Recoupment when an asset is sold may unlock Small business corporation rates and allowances Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Chef's knife roll, whites and personally owned kitchen tools

Depends

A private chef or caterer can claim knives, whites and tools; a chef employed in a restaurant kitchen generally cannot claim the same items.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Trading for own account as a private chef, caterer or pop-up operator makes knives, whites, thermometers, transport containers and ingredient purchases deductible, with knives usually below the small item write-off threshold. Ingredients bought for a specific event are deductible when the event happens, and food still in the fridge at year end is stock. A chef on a restaurant's payroll is a salaried employee and cannot deduct the knife roll he was required to buy, although wear and tear on equipment he owns and uses in his duties may be worth investigating.

Where people go wrong

Employed chefs replacing a stolen knife roll and expecting relief. There is none through the tax system for an employee. The claim to make is on the restaurant or on insurance, not on the ITR12.

Does buying it save you tax?

For a self employed chef, ingredients and transport dwarf the knives and are the claim worth getting right. For an employed chef there is little here.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Wear and tear on own equipment used for work Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Content creator's ring light, studio setup and platform subscription fees

Depends

If content is a real income earning trade, lighting, microphones and camera gear are equipment written off over time, while software and platform fees are deducted in full.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Cameras, microphones, lighting and capture cards are equipment on wear and tear, with many individual items falling under the small item write-off threshold. Editing subscriptions, hosting, platform fees and music licensing are running costs. The prior question is whether you are carrying on a trade: consistent income from brand deals, ad revenue or subscriptions supports it, while an aspirational channel with no revenue does not, and losses from an activity that is not a trade cannot be set off against your salary. Products given to you free by brands are usually income at their value, not free stuff.

Where people go wrong

Forgetting that gifted product and free trips from brand partnerships are taxable receipts. Creators claim the ring light as a deduction and never declare the R30,000 of gifted product that came with the deal. SARS treats the value received for services rendered as income.

Does buying it save you tax?

Once the channel earns real money, yes, and the equipment claim is genuine. Before that, buying gear to 'write it off' against a salary usually fails both the trade test and the ring fencing rules.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s20A excluded by Ring fencing of an assessed loss from a suspect trade governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Courier or delivery driver's motorbike, delivery bag and phone data

Depends

Working as an independent delivery driver, fuel, data, maintenance and the bag are deductible; the bike itself is written off over time.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Gig platform drivers are usually contracting for own account rather than employed, which means fuel, maintenance, tyres, helmet, thermal bag, phone data and platform commission are deductible against delivery income. The motorbike or scooter is an asset on wear and tear. A logbook or the platform's own trip records are essential to show the business portion where the same bike is also used privately. Traffic fines are not deductible.

Where people go wrong

No records. Platform earnings are paid into a bank account and are traceable, but cash fuel purchases with no slips are not. Drivers routinely end up taxed on gross platform earnings because they cannot prove a single expense. Download the platform's trip statements monthly and keep the fuel slips.

Does buying it save you tax?

Very much so, because gross platform earnings badly overstate real profit. Getting the expenses documented is the difference between a manageable assessment and an unpayable one.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(o) excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets governed by Record retention obligation Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

DJ's controller, speakers, lighting and music subscriptions

Depends

Decks, speakers and lighting are equipment written off over time, while music pool subscriptions and track purchases used for paid sets are running costs.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

A controller, CDJs, a mixer, PA speakers and lighting rigs are equipment recovered through wear and tear, with cheaper individual items potentially falling under the small item write-off threshold. Subscriptions to record pools and streaming services used to source music for paid sets are deductible, apportioned if you also listen to them privately, which most people do. Transport to venues, insurance on the rig and equipment repairs are deductible running costs.

Where people go wrong

Claiming a full Spotify or Apple Music subscription as a business cost when it is also your everyday listening. Apportion it honestly, or use a genuine DJ pool subscription that is clearly work only, and keep the two separate.

Does buying it save you tax?

Real but modest. The rig is a slow deduction and heavy private use cuts it further. Transport and repairs are the reliable claims.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(g) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Dentist's chair, X-ray unit, autoclave and materials

Depends

The chair, X-ray unit and scanner are practice equipment written off over years; materials and dental lab fees are deducted as you use them.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Dental units, imaging equipment and sterilisers are equipment recovered through wear and tear over the applicable write-off period. Composites, impression materials, burs, gloves and single use items are consumables deductible when incurred, with unused stock added back at year end. Laboratory fees for crowns and dentures are deductible when incurred, and where you have billed the patient but not yet paid the lab, match the periods properly.

Where people go wrong

Financing a full surgery fit-out and deducting the whole instalment. Only the interest is a running deduction. The equipment cost comes back through wear and tear, and leasehold improvements to rented rooms are a separate regime again, not an immediate deduction.

Does buying it save you tax?

Yes for practice costs, but a fit-out is a business decision, not a tax play. The allowance arrives in slices and a February purchase does not rescue a provisional tax estimate.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s24J, s11(g) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets governed by Lease premiums and leasehold improvements governed by Interest incurred on business borrowing Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Doctor's HPCSA registration, malpractice indemnity cover and rooms

Deductible

In private practice, HPCSA registration, indemnity cover and rooms rent are core deductible practice costs; a hospital-employed doctor on a payslip generally cannot deduct them.

You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer

For a practitioner trading for own account, the annual HPCSA fee, medical defence organisation subscription, practice rent, receptionist salary, practice management software and CPD costs are all expenditure in the production of income and deductible in the year. A registrar or medical officer on a state or hospital payslip is a salaried employee, and s23(m) blocks ordinary work costs even where the HPCSA registration is a legal condition of holding the job. Where a doctor has both a salary and a part time private practice, the practice-related portion is claimable against the practice income.

Where people go wrong

The most common misunderstanding in medicine: 'I cannot work without HPCSA registration, so it must be deductible.' Being compulsory is not the test. Being a salaried employee is what blocks it. The identical fee is deductible for the GP next door in private rooms and not for you.

Does buying it save you tax?

For private practice, yes, these are unavoidable costs and claiming them properly is straightforward money. For an employed doctor, the honest answer is that most of it is not recoverable and you should push the employer to pay the fees directly instead.

Authority s11(a), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Provisional tax as a new business owner Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Editing software subscription: Adobe, Capture One, Final Cut, Lightroom

Deductible

A monthly or annual software subscription used for your work is deducted in full in the year you pay it, unlike the hardware it runs on.

You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer

A subscription buys the right to use software for a period rather than an asset, so it is an ordinary running cost deductible when incurred, which is a genuinely better outcome than the wear and tear treatment applied to the laptop. Where the software is also used for personal projects, apportion. A perpetual licence bought outright for a substantial amount is a different question and may be treated as an asset written off over time rather than deducted in full.

Where people go wrong

Salaried in-house designers and video editors paying for their own Creative Cloud seat and claiming it on the ITR12. A salaried employee cannot deduct ordinary work costs, and a software subscription is not equipment, so the wear and tear route that sometimes rescues an employee's laptop claim does not help here.

Does buying it save you tax?

Yes for the self employed, because it is a full deduction in the year and it is a cost you are paying regardless. It is one of the cleanest claims in the creative trades.

Authority s11(a), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Electrician's test equipment, insulation tester and wireman's registration

Depends

Running your own electrical business, test gear and your registration renewal are claimable business costs, but the test gear usually comes off over several years, not all at once.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Annual registration as an installation or master installation electrician, and the body's renewal fee, are ordinary costs of carrying on the trade and are deductible in the year paid. Test instruments are equipment: below the small item write-off threshold they can be written off immediately, above it they go on wear and tear over the applicable period. The original qualification and trade test that got you registered in the first place is a different animal: initial qualification costs are usually treated as capital or private in nature, while a renewal or CPD refresher is a running cost.

Where people go wrong

Salaried electricians on a firm's payroll routinely claim their own tool purchases and their registration renewal on the ITR12. Those claims are disallowed, and the same person is often unaware that wear and tear on equipment they own and actually use for work is the one thing that may be claimable.

Does buying it save you tax?

Modest but real. A calibration and registration renewal you are legally required to pay anyway is free money to claim. Buying a new test set purely for the deduction is not, since you recover only your marginal rate.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Wear and tear on own equipment used for work Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Estate agent's PPRE qualification, Fidelity Fund certificate and marketing costs

Depends

A commission earning estate agent can deduct real marketing and running costs, which is a genuine exception to the rule that employees cannot deduct work expenses.

The answer turns on the facts · Salaried employee

Where more than the required proportion of your remuneration is commission based on sales, the usual s23(m) block does not apply in the same way and you may deduct expenditure actually incurred in producing that commission: portal listing fees, boards, show day catering, printing, cellphone and business kilometres on a logbook. Annual Fidelity Fund certificate and PPRA fees are running costs of being allowed to trade. The PPRE or professional designation examination that qualifies you in the first place is closer to acquiring a qualification and is a weaker claim than the annual renewal.

Where people go wrong

Assuming commission earner status applies automatically. It depends on the proportion of your remuneration that is commission, and your IRP5 codes must actually reflect it. Agents on a basic salary plus a small commission usually do not qualify, and a full expense claim on that IRP5 will be reversed.

Does buying it save you tax?

For a genuine commission-only agent this is one of the strongest employee-side claims in the whole tax system, and marketing spend is real money. Check the commission proportion first, before you build a claim on it.

Authority s11(a), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by Commission earner business expenses may unlock Travel allowance deduction against business kilometres Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Financial adviser's FSCA levies, RE exams and CPD

Depends

An independent adviser with their own FSP licence deducts the levies, compliance and CPD in full; a tied agent on a payslip generally cannot.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

For a licensed FSP trading for own account, FSCA levies, external compliance officer fees, professional indemnity cover, CPD and licence renewal are ordinary running costs deductible in the year. The RE1 and RE5 regulatory examinations, and the initial qualification needed to get licensed, are entry requirements and are closer to acquiring a qualification, so they are a materially weaker claim than the annual levies. An adviser employed by an insurer as a tied agent is caught by s23(m) unless they meet the commission earner test.

Where people go wrong

Treating the RE5 exam fee like the annual levy. One is the price of entry into the trade and one is the cost of continuing a trade you already carry on. SARS treats those differently and lumping them together weakens the whole claim.

Does buying it save you tax?

For an independent FSP the recurring compliance burden is large and fully deductible, so claim it properly. It is a cost of doing business, not a tax play.

Authority s11(a), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Commission earner business expenses Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Graphic designer's drawing tablet, fonts and stock image licences

Depends

The tablet is equipment written off over time; font and stock image licences bought for client work are deducted in the year.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

A Cintiq, iPad Pro or colour-calibrated monitor is equipment recovered through wear and tear, with smaller items possibly under the small item write-off threshold. Per-project font licences, stock photography, mockup packs and plugin subscriptions are ordinary running costs. Where a client reimburses you for a stock licence, that reimbursement is income and the licence is your expense; do not simply leave both off the return.

Where people go wrong

Salaried designers claiming their home setup. If you are on a payslip, the tablet you bought yourself is not deductible as a purchase, and font licences are not equipment so the employee wear and tear route does not reach them either.

Does buying it save you tax?

Solid for freelancers because licences are a clean full-year deduction. Buying a new tablet in February to reduce tax does very little, because you only get a slice.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Hairdresser's styling chair, scissors, dryers and colour stock

Depends

Chairs, basins and dryers are salon equipment written off over time, while colour, treatments and retail products are stock deducted as you sell or use them.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Chairs, wash basins, mirrors and hooded dryers are equipment recovered through wear and tear. Scissors, clippers and a straightener will often individually fall under the small item write-off threshold and come off in full. Colour, peroxide, shampoo used in treatments and retail product you resell are trading stock, so closing stock on the shelf at year end is added back and only what actually went through the salon reduces this year's profit. If you rent a chair in someone else's salon you are usually trading for your own account, and the chair rental itself is deductible.

Where people go wrong

Rent-a-chair stylists who assume the salon owner 'handles the tax'. You are trading in your own right, you are likely a provisional taxpayer, and nobody is deducting PAYE for you. Registering late is a bigger problem than any deduction you miss.

Does buying it save you tax?

Product and chair rental are your two biggest real deductions and both are usually under claimed. Equipment reduces tax slowly, so buy it when the salon needs it.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s22 governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Provisional tax as a new business owner Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Independent nurse or agency nurse's uniform, SANC fee and indemnity

Deductible

If you nurse for your own account rather than on a payslip, the uniform, the SANC fee and your indemnity cover are deductible business costs.

You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Trading for own account changes everything: the s23(m) block on employee deductions does not apply, so registration, professional indemnity, uniforms, a blood pressure cuff and other equipment, and travel between patients all become claimable against your nursing income. Equipment above the small item write-off threshold goes on wear and tear rather than being deducted in full. Keep a logbook if you drive between patients, because that is usually the largest claim.

Where people go wrong

Assuming that being paid without PAYE deducted automatically makes you self employed. If the agency controls your hours, your supervision and your work, SARS may still treat you as an employee, and the deductions fall away. Look at the substance of the arrangement, not just how you are paid.

Does buying it save you tax?

Yes, and the contrast with employed nurses is stark: the identical uniform and the identical SANC fee are deductible for you and not for the nurse standing next to you on the ward.

Authority s11(a), s11(e) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Business travel, flights and accommodation Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Mechanic's tool chest, socket sets and diagnostic scanner

Depends

If you run your own workshop, the tool chest, the lift and the scanner are claimable, but a mechanic employed at a dealership generally cannot deduct the tools he was told to buy.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

For your own account, a two post lift, compressor and diagnostic scanner are equipment recovered through wear and tear, and individual hand tools under the small item write-off threshold come off in full. Annual subscriptions to diagnostic software and manufacturer data platforms are running costs deductible in the year. A salaried mechanic who buys his own Snap-on chest on a payment plan gets no deduction for the tool cost itself, and the finance charges on the plan are private interest, but wear and tear on equipment he owns and genuinely uses in performing his duties is the narrow exception worth investigating.

Where people go wrong

Dealership mechanics are the classic case: the employer requires you to own your tools, so it feels like a work expense, but a salaried employee cannot deduct ordinary work costs. Do not claim the purchase price on your ITR12. Look at wear and tear on your own equipment instead, and expect to have to prove business use.

Does buying it save you tax?

For a self employed mechanic, yes, this is core trade expenditure. For a salaried one, the honest answer is that most of what you spend on tools is not recoverable through tax and you should negotiate a tool allowance with the employer instead.

Authority s11(e), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Wear and tear on own equipment used for work Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Musician's instrument, amplifier and gigging costs

Depends

If you gig for money, the instrument and amp are equipment written off over time and the travel, rehearsal room and strings are running costs.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Instruments and amplification are equipment recovered through wear and tear. Strings, sticks, reeds and cables are consumables deducted as used. Travel to gigs, rehearsal room hire and session fees you pay other players are ordinary trade expenses. The threshold question is whether you are carrying on a trade at all: playing at open mics with occasional door money and no real prospect of profit looks like a hobby, and a loss from a non-trade activity is not deductible.

Where people go wrong

Running a permanent loss from music against a salary from a day job. SARS can ring fence an assessed loss from a suspect trade so it cannot be set off against other income, and part time music with persistent losses is exactly the kind of activity that gets looked at.

Does buying it save you tax?

For a working musician with real gig income, absolutely, and travel is usually the biggest missed claim. For a weekend hobbyist, chasing the deduction is more likely to attract attention than to save money.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s20A excluded by Ring fencing of an assessed loss from a suspect trade governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Nail technician's UV lamp, drill, gels and tips

Depends

Gels, tips and files are consumable stock deducted as you use them; the lamp, drill and dust extractor are small equipment items usually written off in the year you buy them.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Most nail technology equipment is individually inexpensive enough to fall under the small item write-off threshold and be deducted in full, which is unusual and works in your favour. Product is trading stock, so track what is on the shelf at year end. If you are mobile and drive to clients, keep a logbook: business kilometres are a separate and often larger claim than the product itself.

Where people go wrong

Working from home, seeing clients in the lounge, and then claiming a share of the whole house. The home office rules require a specific part of the home used regularly and exclusively for the trade, and a lounge that doubles as the family living room does not qualify.

Does buying it save you tax?

Genuinely worth doing because nail techs are usually cash-heavy, under-registered and under-claiming both. The single biggest win is usually the vehicle logbook, not the product.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(b) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Home office for a sole proprietor may unlock Business travel, flights and accommodation Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Nurse's uniform, shoes and SANC annual registration

Not deductible

If you are an employed nurse on a payslip, your scrubs and your SANC annual fee are not deductible, no matter that both are compulsory.

There is no relief for this · Salaried employee

A salaried employee cannot deduct ordinary work costs, and neither a uniform nor a statutory registration fee escapes that. The narrow exceptions available to employees are things like pension and retirement annuity contributions, donations, and wear and tear on your own equipment genuinely used in performing your duties, which a uniform is not. If your employer pays the SANC fee or gives you a uniform, that is the right outcome and there is nothing further to claim. An agency or independent nurse contracting for own account is in a different position entirely and can claim both.

Where people go wrong

This is the single most common misunderstanding in nursing. Compulsory does not mean deductible. Employed nurses file claims for scrubs, shoes and SANC every year and they are disallowed. The real question to ask is not 'can I claim it' but 'will my employer reimburse it', because a reimbursement puts the whole amount in your pocket instead of your marginal rate.

Does buying it save you tax?

No. There is no tax relief here for an employed nurse. Ask the employer to pay the SANC fee directly, which is worth far more than any deduction would have been.

Authority s23(m) governed by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs may unlock Wear and tear on own equipment used for work Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Online seller's stock, packaging and courier costs

Depends

Packaging, courier fees and marketplace commission are deducted in full in the year; the stock in your spare room is not a deduction until it sells.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Marketplace commission, payment gateway fees, courier charges, packaging materials, product photography and platform subscriptions are running costs deductible when incurred. Inventory is trading stock: what is unsold at year end is added back, so buying stock does not reduce this year's tax. Imported stock brings customs duty and import VAT into the cost of the stock. If you store and pack from home, home office rules apply and require a specific area used regularly and exclusively for the trade.

Where people go wrong

Buying R100,000 of stock in February expecting a deduction. Unsold stock is added back, so a seller can be sitting on a garage full of inventory, zero cash, and still owe tax on paper profit. This is the classic first-year e-commerce cash flow disaster.

Does buying it save you tax?

Courier and commission costs are large, recurring and fully deductible, so track them from day one. Stock purchases are not a tax lever at all, and treating them as one is how sellers get into trouble.

Authority s11(a), s22, s23(b) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Home office for a sole proprietor may unlock Compulsory and voluntary VAT registration Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Painter's extension ladders, spray gun and drop sheets

Depends

Brushes, tape and drop sheets are consumables you deduct as you use them, while a ladder set or an airless sprayer is equipment written off over time.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Split the invoice mentally: consumables used up on jobs are ordinary running costs deductible in the year, and paint bought for a specific job is trading stock recovered when the job is done. Durable equipment goes on wear and tear, unless the individual item falls under the small item write-off threshold, in which case it comes off in full. Where the same ladder is also used at home, only the business portion is claimable.

Where people go wrong

Claiming the paint for a job you have invoiced but where the client has not paid yet, and then also claiming it again when you write the debt off. The paint is deducted once, and the unpaid invoice is dealt with separately as a bad debt.

Does buying it save you tax?

Worth claiming because these costs are genuinely incurred and painters keep terrible records of them. Keep the Builders Warehouse slips: that habit is worth more than any single purchase decision.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s22 governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Bad and doubtful debts Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Personal trainer's equipment, gym floor rental and qualifications

Depends

Renting gym floor space, insurance and registration are deducted in full; the equipment you buy is usually small enough to write off immediately, and your own gym membership usually is not deductible.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Floor rental paid to a gym for the right to train clients, public liability insurance, professional body registration and client management software are running costs. Kettlebells, bands and mats are usually individually below the small item write-off threshold and can be written off in the year, while a rig or a set of machines is equipment on wear and tear. Your own gym membership is a mixed cost: it keeps you fit personally as well as giving you access to train clients, and SARS is sceptical of that claim unless the access is specifically the trading arrangement.

Where people go wrong

Claiming your own supplements, protein and gym membership as business costs because 'my body is my product'. Expenditure of a private or domestic nature is not deductible, and food and fitness for your own body sits squarely there.

Does buying it save you tax?

Floor rental and insurance are worth claiming and are usually the bulk of the spend. Equipment is a real but small deduction. Supplements are not a deduction at all.

Authority s11(a), s23(a), s23(b) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Pharmacist's dispensing stock and SAPC registration

Depends

Medicine on the shelf is trading stock, not an expense, and only what you actually sell reduces this year's taxable income.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Stock purchases are recorded, but closing stock on hand at year end is added back, so the deduction follows the sale, not the purchase. SAPC registration for the pharmacy and for the responsible pharmacist, dispensing software, the fridge for cold chain items and shelving are separate: fees and software are running costs, the fridge and fittings are equipment on wear and tear. Expired stock written off is deductible if genuinely destroyed and documented.

Where people go wrong

Loading up on stock before year end to reduce tax. It does not work, because unsold stock is added back. The second trap is writing off expired stock without a destruction record, which is exactly the claim SARS asks to see evidence for.

Does buying it save you tax?

No tax advantage in buying stock early. The real deductions are the fixed practice costs and properly documented stock write-offs.

Authority s22, s11(a), s11(e) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Photographer's camera bodies, lenses and lighting

Wear and tear

Camera bodies and lenses are business equipment written off over several years, not deducted in full the day you buy them.

Written off over time, not all at once · Sole proprietor or freelancer

A body, lens or lighting kit is recovered through the wear and tear allowance over the write-off period SARS accepts for photographic equipment; smaller accessories such as memory cards, filters and a tripod may fall under the small item write-off threshold and be deducted in full. Where the same camera also takes family holiday photos, only the business portion is claimable and you should be able to describe the split honestly. Selling a lens later for more than its written down value triggers a recoupment back into income.

Where people go wrong

The R80,000 body bought in February to 'wipe out' a provisional tax bill. You get one year's slice of the allowance, not the whole cost, and if you use it privately as well that slice is reduced again.

Does buying it save you tax?

Buy glass because you need the glass. The tax saving is your marginal rate spread over the write-off period, which is a lot less than it feels like at the till.

Authority s11(e), s23(g), s8(4)(a) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets governed by Recoupment when an asset is sold Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Plumber's hand tools, pipe threader and van stock of fittings

Depends

If you plumb for your own account, tools and van stock are claimable, but small tools and big tools are treated differently and stock only counts when you use it.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Consumable fittings and spares carried on the van are trading stock: what is still on the van at year end is closing stock and is added back, so only what you actually fitted reduces this year's profit. Hand tools that cost less than the small item write-off threshold are generally written off in full in the year of purchase; a pipe threader, press tool or drain machine above that threshold goes on wear and tear over its write-off period. If you are employed by a plumbing firm on a payslip, ordinary tool costs are not deductible at all, although wear and tear on equipment you own and use for work may still be.

Where people go wrong

Buying R40,000 of stock on 26 February to 'get the deduction' does nothing. Unused stock on hand at year end is added back as closing stock, so the deduction only lands when the fittings go into a customer's wall.

Does buying it save you tax?

The tools you genuinely need are worth claiming and most plumbers under claim them. But it reduces taxable income, so you get back your marginal rate, not the price of the tool. Never buy a tool you do not need for the tax.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s22 excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Psychologist's consulting rooms, supervision fees and HPCSA registration

Deductible

In private practice, rooms, ongoing supervision, test materials and registration are deductible; in a salaried clinic post they generally are not.

You can claim this · Sole proprietor or freelancer

For a practitioner in private practice, consulting room rent, ongoing clinical supervision required to maintain practice standards, psychometric test kits and scoring licences, professional body membership and CPD are ordinary trade expenditure deductible in the year. Test kits with a long useful life may be equipment rather than a running cost. Supervision that forms part of qualifying as a psychologist in the first place, such as an internship requirement, is closer to acquiring a qualification and is unlikely to be deductible.

Where people go wrong

Mixing the two kinds of supervision. Supervision you pay for while still qualifying is part of getting the qualification. Supervision you pay for as an established practitioner to maintain and improve practice in a trade you already carry on is a different and much stronger claim. Describe which one it is.

Does buying it save you tax?

Rooms and supervision are large recurring costs and genuinely worth claiming for private practitioners. For employed psychologists in state or NGO posts, most of it is blocked.

Authority s11(a), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Restaurant kitchen equipment, extraction and food stock

Depends

Ovens, fridges and the extraction system are written off over years; food stock only reduces profit when it is sold, and the shopfit is a separate regime again.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Commercial ovens, cold rooms, fryers and POS hardware are equipment on wear and tear, and crockery and glassware may fall under the small item write-off threshold. Food and beverage stock is trading stock, with closing stock at year end added back. Money spent building out a rented shop, such as a new counter, ceilings and an extraction duct, is leasehold improvement expenditure with its own treatment and is not a straight deduction. Staff meals and breakages are running costs.

Where people go wrong

Deducting the whole fit-out of a leased restaurant in year one. Leasehold improvements are not an ordinary repair and are not immediately deductible, and this is one of the most expensive mistakes new restaurateurs make on their first return.

Does buying it save you tax?

Stock, wages, rent and utilities are your real deductions and they are large. Equipment and fit-out are business investments, not tax plays: the relief arrives in slices over years.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s22, s11(g) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets governed by Lease premiums and leasehold improvements may unlock Repairs to business property Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Security guard's PSIRA registration, uniform and boots

Not deductible

A guard employed by a security company cannot deduct PSIRA registration, uniform or boots, even though the registration is legally required to work.

There is no relief for this · Salaried employee

Employed guards are salaried employees and s23(m) blocks ordinary work costs, including a compulsory statutory registration. Grade training that first qualifies you to register is also unlikely to be deductible even for the self employed, because it is qualification expenditure. A person running their own registered security business is in a different position and can deduct the business PSIRA registration, uniforms issued to staff, radios and vehicle costs against the business income.

Where people go wrong

The same misunderstanding as nurses and doctors: PSIRA registration is compulsory, so it feels deductible. It is not, for an employee. Many security companies deduct the PSIRA fee from the guard's wages, which does not create a deduction either; it just means the guard bore the cost.

Does buying it save you tax?

No relief for an employed guard. If the company deducts PSIRA fees from your pay, that is a wage question to raise with the employer, not something the tax return can fix.

Authority s23(m) governed by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs may unlock General deduction for expenditure in producing income Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Software developer's laptop, developer licences and online courses

Depends

A freelance developer writes the laptop off over time, deducts hosting and tool subscriptions in full, and has to think harder about courses.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

The laptop and monitors are equipment on wear and tear. Cloud hosting, domains, IDE and AI tool subscriptions and code signing certificates are running costs deducted in the year. Training is the split: a short course that keeps existing skills current in the trade you already carry on is generally a running cost, while a degree or a bootcamp that qualifies you to enter a new field is closer to capital or private expenditure and is unlikely to be deductible.

Where people go wrong

Employed developers claiming a personally bought MacBook and an AWS bill. A salaried employee cannot deduct ordinary work costs. Wear and tear on your own equipment used for work is the only realistic avenue, and cloud spend for an employer's project is not it. Get the employer to reimburse instead.

Does buying it save you tax?

For freelancers and contractors this is one of the better-defined expense sets and worth claiming carefully. A R45,000 laptop still only returns your marginal rate, spread over years.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(m) excluded by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Wear and tear on own equipment used for work Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Spaza shop stock, chest freezer and prepaid airtime float

Depends

The fridge and shelving are equipment written off over time; stock on the shelf is not a deduction until it is sold, and airtime float is not an expense at all.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

A chest freezer, cold drinks fridge, shelving and a security gate are equipment on wear and tear, with cheaper items falling under the small item write-off threshold. Stock is trading stock and closing stock at year end is added back. Money put into airtime or prepaid electricity float is not expenditure at all: you are buying something to resell, and your income is the commission or margin, not the gross value that passes through. Where turnover is small, turnover tax for micro businesses may be a simpler regime than normal income tax and is worth comparing.

Where people go wrong

Treating the entire amount that passes through the airtime and prepaid electricity till as turnover, or alternatively as an expense. Neither is right. Only your commission or margin is income, and getting this wrong can push you over a VAT registration threshold that you never actually reached.

Does buying it save you tax?

The real gains for a spaza are choosing the right tax regime and recording stock properly, not chasing individual deductions. Buying a second freezer in February will not shift your tax bill much.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s22, Sixth Schedule governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Turnover tax for micro businesses may unlock Compulsory and voluntary VAT registration Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Street trader's cart, gazebo and municipal trading permit

Depends

Permit and stall fees are deducted in the year; the cart, gazebo and trestle tables are equipment, usually cheap enough to write off immediately.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Municipal trading permits, market stall fees, storage and transport of stock to the site are ordinary running costs deductible when incurred. A cart, gazebo, tables and a gas burner are equipment, and most will individually fall under the small item write-off threshold so they come off in full. Stock is trading stock with closing stock added back. Where annual turnover is small, turnover tax may be a considerably simpler compliance route than a full income tax return.

Where people go wrong

Not registering at all because the trade is cash. Turnover tax and the tax threshold mean many small traders would owe little or nothing anyway, but being unregistered turns a nil liability into administrative penalties and an understatement problem when SARS eventually catches up.

Does buying it save you tax?

For most small traders the real value is not the deductions, it is choosing the simplest legitimate regime and being registered. The deductions themselves are usually smaller than the compliance risk.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), Sixth Schedule excluded by Administrative penalties for non submission governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income may unlock Turnover tax for micro businesses Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Tattoo artist's machine, inks, needles and autoclave

Depends

Inks, needles and single use supplies are deducted as you use them; the machines, autoclave and studio fittings are written off over time.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

Needles, cartridges, ink, gloves, wrap and green soap are consumables deductible when incurred, and inks still in the drawer at year end are stock. Machines, power supplies, an autoclave and a tattoo bed are equipment, with cheaper items falling under the small item write-off threshold. Municipal health certification and premises inspection fees for the studio are ordinary trade costs, and studio rent is deductible in full where the space is used only for the business.

Where people go wrong

Cash work that never goes near a bank account. The deductions are worthless if the income is undeclared, and an undeclared trade is an understatement penalty problem, not a deduction problem. Declare the income and then claim properly.

Does buying it save you tax?

Yes, and the consumables add up to more than most artists realise over a year. But the honest headline is that getting the income declared correctly protects you far more than any deduction gains you.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s22 excluded by Understatement penalty percentages governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Taxi operator's minibus, operating licence and vehicle running costs

Depends

Fuel, tyres, repairs, association and rank fees are deducted in the year; the taxi itself is written off over time, and only the interest on the finance is a running cost.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

The vehicle is a business asset recovered through wear and tear over the write-off period SARS accepts for vehicles. On a financed taxi, only the finance charge portion of the instalment is deductible, not the capital portion, which is recovered through the allowance instead. Operating licence fees, taxi association subscriptions, rank fees, driver wages, fuel, tyres and maintenance are running costs. Fines for traffic offences are specifically not deductible.

Where people go wrong

Three of them, and all are expensive. Deducting the full monthly instalment on the taxi double-counts the capital. Traffic fines, a real and large cost in this trade, are specifically excluded no matter how routine they feel. And the input VAT on buying the minibus itself is DENIED: a minibus is named in its own right in the VAT Act's definition of a motor car, so s17(2)(c) applies with no space test and no exception for carrying fare-paying passengers. Interpretation Note 82 lists the exceptions exhaustively at 3.8 and there are only three: motor dealers acquiring cars exclusively for resale or rental TO OTHERS, demonstration vehicles held by those dealers, and cars awarded as competition prizes. An owner-driver is none of them. A business that RENTS minibuses out to other operators may qualify under the first; a business that drives passengers does not. The income tax deduction and the wear and tear are unaffected: it is only the input tax that is denied.

Does buying it save you tax?

The running costs are large and genuinely deductible, so proper records matter more here than in almost any other trade. Records are also what makes the difference in a SARS verification, because fuel bought in cash without slips is very hard to defend.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s24J, s23(o), VAT Act s17(2)(c) excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets governed by Interest incurred on business borrowing Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Teacher's classroom supplies bought out of her own pocket

Not deductible

A teacher on a school payslip cannot deduct the stationery, books and posters she buys for her own classroom, however unfair that feels.

There is no relief for this · Salaried employee

Employed teachers are salaried employees and s23(m) blocks ordinary work costs. There is no educator expense deduction in South African tax law. The only realistic angles are a laptop or projector you own and genuinely use in your duties, where wear and tear may be claimable, and asking the school to reimburse you out of the school fund, which returns the full amount rather than a fraction of it. A private tutor trading for own account is in a completely different position and can claim materials.

Where people go wrong

Every February a teacher spends thousands on her classroom and expects it back at assessment. It does not come back. The mistake is asking the tax system for relief instead of asking the school for a reimbursement or a receipt against the school fund.

Does buying it save you tax?

No. There is no relief here. Keep the slips and claim from the school, not from SARS. If you also tutor privately, that income and its expenses are a separate and claimable trade.

Authority s23(m) governed by Salaried employees cannot deduct ordinary work costs may unlock Wear and tear on own equipment used for work Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Vet's practice equipment, drugs and SAVC registration

Depends

Surgical equipment and imaging are written off over years; drugs, vaccines and consumables are deducted as you use them, and SAVC registration is a running cost.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

An anaesthetic machine, X-ray unit, surgical table and autoclave are equipment on wear and tear. Vaccines, anaesthetics, sutures and dressings are consumable stock deductible as used, with stock on hand at year end added back. SAVC registration, practice insurance and practice management software are deductible in the year. A bakkie used for farm and mobile calls is a vehicle with its own rules, and you need a logbook to support the business portion.

Where people go wrong

The practice bakkie used for weekend trips as well as farm calls. Without a logbook the business portion is guesswork, and SARS disallows guesswork. Start the logbook on 1 March, not when the audit letter arrives.

Does buying it save you tax?

The recurring practice costs are worth claiming carefully. Equipment purchases should be driven by clinical need, since the tax relief arrives slowly.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s22 governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets may unlock Business travel, flights and accommodation Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Videographer's drone and RPAS pilot licence

Depends

A drone used commercially is equipment written off over time, and the licensing and registration you need to fly it commercially are running costs.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

The airframe itself is equipment recovered through wear and tear; batteries, propellers and spares are consumables. Civil Aviation Authority registration, the operating certificate and drone insurance are recurring costs of being allowed to trade and are deductible in the year. The initial remote pilot licence course is closer to acquiring a qualification, which is typically capital or private in nature, whereas recurrency and renewal training is a running cost.

Where people go wrong

Flying commercially without the required RPAS licence and operating certificate and then claiming the drone. The deduction is not automatically lost for illegality of that kind, but fines and penalties imposed for unlawful conduct are specifically not deductible, and an uninsured, unlicensed commercial flight is a business risk far larger than the tax.

Does buying it save you tax?

If drone work is a real revenue line, yes. If you bought a Mavic for holiday footage and shot one paid job with it, expect to apportion heavily and expect SARS to ask.

Authority s11(a), s11(e), s23(o) excluded by Fines, penalties and unlawful payments are not deductible governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Welder's welding machine, gas cylinders and consumables

Depends

The welding machine is written off over time as equipment; the rods, wire and gas you burn through are deducted as you use them.

The answer turns on the facts · Sole proprietor or freelancer

A MIG or TIG plant, a generator and a plasma cutter are equipment recovered through wear and tear, with items under the small item write-off threshold coming off in full. Gas, rods, wire, discs and PPE such as a welding helmet, gloves and leathers are consumed in the trade and are deductible when incurred. Cylinder rental and refill charges are running costs; a deposit paid on a cylinder you get back is not a deduction, it is a deposit.

Where people go wrong

Treating the refundable cylinder deposit as an expense. It is a refundable amount, not expenditure incurred, and SARS will disallow it if the deposit is later returned to you.

Does buying it save you tax?

The consumables are a real and often large deduction that welders forget to track. The machine is worth buying when the work is there, not when the tax bill is due.

Authority s11(a), s11(e) governed by General deduction for expenditure in producing income governed by Wear and tear on business assets Trades and professions
Research, not advice. This has not yet been checked against the Act or a SARS guide, so treat it as a starting point and a question for your practitioner, not a claim you can make.

Why so many of these say no

Because that is the truth, and a catalogue that never says no is a brochure. Most spending does not become cheaper because it is deductible: a deduction reduces your taxable income, so you get back your marginal rate, not the price. The money in a tax return is almost never in buying more things. It is in the claims you already qualify for and never made, and in being able to prove them.

Check what your own records support